[PATCH v3 17/27] KVM: x86: Mark CR4.FRED as not reserved when guest can use FRED

Xin Li (Intel) posted 27 patches 1 year, 4 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 17/27] KVM: x86: Mark CR4.FRED as not reserved when guest can use FRED
Posted by Xin Li (Intel) 1 year, 4 months ago
From: Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>

The CR4.FRED bit, i.e., CR4[32], is no longer a reserved bit when
guest can use FRED, i.e.,
  1) All of FRED KVM support is in place.
  2) Guest enumerates FRED.
Otherwise it is still a reserved bit.

Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
Tested-by: Shan Kang <shan.kang@intel.com>
---

Changes since v2:
* Don't allow CR4.FRED=1 before all of FRED KVM support is in place
  (Sean Christopherson).
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          | 4 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.h              | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 3830084b569b..87f9f0b6cf3c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
 			  | X86_CR4_OSXSAVE | X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_FSGSBASE \
 			  | X86_CR4_OSXMMEXCPT | X86_CR4_LA57 | X86_CR4_VMXE \
 			  | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE | X86_CR4_UMIP \
-			  | X86_CR4_LAM_SUP))
+			  | X86_CR4_LAM_SUP | X86_CR4_FRED))
 
 #define CR8_RESERVED_BITS (~(unsigned long)X86_CR8_TPR)
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 03f42b218554..bfdd10773136 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -8009,6 +8009,10 @@ void vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LAM);
 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED);
 
+	/* Don't allow CR4.FRED=1 before all of FRED KVM support is in place. */
+	if (!guest_can_use(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED))
+		vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits |= X86_CR4_FRED;
+
 	vmx_setup_uret_msrs(vmx);
 
 	if (cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls())
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
index 992e73ee2ec5..0ed91512b757 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
@@ -561,6 +561,8 @@ enum kvm_msr_access {
 		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_PCIDE;       \
 	if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_LAM))           \
 		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_LAM_SUP;     \
+	if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_FRED))          \
+		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_FRED;        \
 	__reserved_bits;                                \
 })
 
-- 
2.46.2
Re: [PATCH v3 17/27] KVM: x86: Mark CR4.FRED as not reserved when guest can use FRED
Posted by Chao Gao 1 year, 3 months ago
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>index 03f42b218554..bfdd10773136 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>@@ -8009,6 +8009,10 @@ void vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LAM);
> 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED);
> 
>+	/* Don't allow CR4.FRED=1 before all of FRED KVM support is in place. */
>+	if (!guest_can_use(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED))
>+		vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits |= X86_CR4_FRED;

is this necessary? __kvm_is_valid_cr4() ensures that guests cannot set any bit
which isn't supported by the hardware.

To account for hardware/KVM caps, I think the following changes will work. This
will fix all other bits besides X86_CR4_FRED.

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4a93ac1b9be9..2bec3ba8e47d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1873,6 +1873,7 @@ struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
 extern u32 __read_mostly kvm_nr_uret_msrs;
 extern bool __read_mostly allow_smaller_maxphyaddr;
 extern bool __read_mostly enable_apicv;
+extern u64 __read_mostly cr4_reserved_bits;
 extern struct kvm_x86_ops kvm_x86_ops;
 
 #define kvm_x86_call(func) static_call(kvm_x86_##func)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 2617be544480..57d82fbcfd3f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.reserved_gpa_bits = kvm_vcpu_reserved_gpa_bits_raw(vcpu);
 
 	kvm_pmu_refresh(vcpu);
-	vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits =
-	    __cr4_reserved_bits(guest_cpuid_has, vcpu);
+	vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits = cr4_reserved_bits |
+					 __cr4_reserved_bits(guest_cpuid_has, vcpu);
 
 	kvm_hv_set_cpuid(vcpu, kvm_cpuid_has_hyperv(vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries,
 						    vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent));
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 34b52b49f5e6..08b42bbd2342 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)(EFER_SCE | EFER_LME | EFER_LMA));
 static u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)EFER_SCE);
 #endif
 
-static u64 __read_mostly cr4_reserved_bits = CR4_RESERVED_BITS;
+u64 __read_mostly cr4_reserved_bits;
 
 #define KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL_VALID_MASK (1 << KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE)
 
@@ -1110,13 +1110,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_xsetbv);
 
 bool __kvm_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
 {
-	if (cr4 & cr4_reserved_bits)
-		return false;
-
-	if (cr4 & vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits)
-		return false;
-
-	return true;
+	return !(cr4 & vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_is_valid_cr4);
 

>+
> 	vmx_setup_uret_msrs(vmx);
> 
> 	if (cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls())
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>index 992e73ee2ec5..0ed91512b757 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>@@ -561,6 +561,8 @@ enum kvm_msr_access {
> 		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_PCIDE;       \
> 	if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_LAM))           \
> 		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_LAM_SUP;     \
>+	if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_FRED))          \
>+		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_FRED;        \
> 	__reserved_bits;                                \
> })
> 
>-- 
>2.46.2
>
>
Re: [PATCH v3 17/27] KVM: x86: Mark CR4.FRED as not reserved when guest can use FRED
Posted by Xin Li 1 year, 1 month ago
On 10/24/2024 12:18 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index 03f42b218554..bfdd10773136 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -8009,6 +8009,10 @@ void vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LAM);
>> 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED);
>>
>> +	/* Don't allow CR4.FRED=1 before all of FRED KVM support is in place. */
>> +	if (!guest_can_use(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED))
>> +		vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits |= X86_CR4_FRED;
> 
> is this necessary? __kvm_is_valid_cr4() ensures that guests cannot set any bit
> which isn't supported by the hardware.
> 
> To account for hardware/KVM caps, I think the following changes will work. This
> will fix all other bits besides X86_CR4_FRED.

This seems a generic infra improvement, maybe it's better for you to
send it as an individual patch to Sean and the KVM mailing list?

> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 4a93ac1b9be9..2bec3ba8e47d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1873,6 +1873,7 @@ struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
>   extern u32 __read_mostly kvm_nr_uret_msrs;
>   extern bool __read_mostly allow_smaller_maxphyaddr;
>   extern bool __read_mostly enable_apicv;
> +extern u64 __read_mostly cr4_reserved_bits;
>   extern struct kvm_x86_ops kvm_x86_ops;
>   
>   #define kvm_x86_call(func) static_call(kvm_x86_##func)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 2617be544480..57d82fbcfd3f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	vcpu->arch.reserved_gpa_bits = kvm_vcpu_reserved_gpa_bits_raw(vcpu);
>   
>   	kvm_pmu_refresh(vcpu);
> -	vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits =
> -	    __cr4_reserved_bits(guest_cpuid_has, vcpu);
> +	vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits = cr4_reserved_bits |
> +					 __cr4_reserved_bits(guest_cpuid_has, vcpu);
>   
>   	kvm_hv_set_cpuid(vcpu, kvm_cpuid_has_hyperv(vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries,
>   						    vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent));
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 34b52b49f5e6..08b42bbd2342 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)(EFER_SCE | EFER_LME | EFER_LMA));
>   static u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)EFER_SCE);
>   #endif
>   
> -static u64 __read_mostly cr4_reserved_bits = CR4_RESERVED_BITS;
> +u64 __read_mostly cr4_reserved_bits;
>   
>   #define KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL_VALID_MASK (1 << KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE)
>   
> @@ -1110,13 +1110,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_xsetbv);
>   
>   bool __kvm_is_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
>   {
> -	if (cr4 & cr4_reserved_bits)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (cr4 & vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	return true;
> +	return !(cr4 & vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_is_valid_cr4);
>   
> 
>> +
>> 	vmx_setup_uret_msrs(vmx);
>>
>> 	if (cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls())
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>> index 992e73ee2ec5..0ed91512b757 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>> @@ -561,6 +561,8 @@ enum kvm_msr_access {
>> 		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_PCIDE;       \
>> 	if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_LAM))           \
>> 		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_LAM_SUP;     \
>> +	if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_FRED))          \
>> +		__reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_FRED;        \
>> 	__reserved_bits;                                \
>> })
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.46.2
>>
>>
Re: [PATCH v3 17/27] KVM: x86: Mark CR4.FRED as not reserved when guest can use FRED
Posted by Sean Christopherson 1 year, 1 month ago
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024, Xin Li wrote:
> On 10/24/2024 12:18 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > index 03f42b218554..bfdd10773136 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > @@ -8009,6 +8009,10 @@ void vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LAM);
> > > 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED);
> > > 
> > > +	/* Don't allow CR4.FRED=1 before all of FRED KVM support is in place. */
> > > +	if (!guest_can_use(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED))
> > > +		vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits |= X86_CR4_FRED;
> > 
> > is this necessary? __kvm_is_valid_cr4() ensures that guests cannot set any bit
> > which isn't supported by the hardware.
> > 
> > To account for hardware/KVM caps, I think the following changes will work. This
> > will fix all other bits besides X86_CR4_FRED.
> 
> This seems a generic infra improvement, maybe it's better for you to
> send it as an individual patch to Sean and the KVM mailing list?

Already ahead of y'all :-)  (I think, I didn't look closely at this).

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241128013424.4096668-6-seanjc@google.com
Re: [PATCH v3 17/27] KVM: x86: Mark CR4.FRED as not reserved when guest can use FRED
Posted by Xin Li 1 year, 1 month ago
On 12/12/2024 11:05 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024, Xin Li wrote:
>> On 10/24/2024 12:18 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> index 03f42b218554..bfdd10773136 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>>> @@ -8009,6 +8009,10 @@ void vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>> 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LAM);
>>>> 	kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED);
>>>>
>>>> +	/* Don't allow CR4.FRED=1 before all of FRED KVM support is in place. */
>>>> +	if (!guest_can_use(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FRED))
>>>> +		vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits |= X86_CR4_FRED;
>>>
>>> is this necessary? __kvm_is_valid_cr4() ensures that guests cannot set any bit
>>> which isn't supported by the hardware.
>>>
>>> To account for hardware/KVM caps, I think the following changes will work. This
>>> will fix all other bits besides X86_CR4_FRED.
>>
>> This seems a generic infra improvement, maybe it's better for you to
>> send it as an individual patch to Sean and the KVM mailing list?
> 
> Already ahead of y'all :-)  (I think, I didn't look closely at this).
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241128013424.4096668-6-seanjc@google.com

Ha, that is nice.  Thank you!