[PATCH] resource, kunit: Fix user-after-free in resource_test_region_intersects()

Huang Ying posted 1 patch 1 month, 4 weeks ago
kernel/resource_kunit.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[PATCH] resource, kunit: Fix user-after-free in resource_test_region_intersects()
Posted by Huang Ying 1 month, 4 weeks ago
In resource_test_insert_resource(), the pointer is used in error
message after kfree().  This is user-after-free.  To fix this, we need
to call kunit_add_action_or_reset() to schedule memory freeing after
usage.  But kunit_add_action_or_reset() itself may fail and free the
memory.  So, its return value should be checked and abort the test for
failure.  Then, we found that other usage of
kunit_add_action_or_reset() in resource_test_region_intersects() needs
to be fixed too.  We fix all these user-after-free bugs in this patch.

Fixes: 99185c10d5d9 ("resource, kunit: add test case for region_intersects()")
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Kees Bakker <kees@ijzerbout.nl>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87ldzaotcg.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com/
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 kernel/resource_kunit.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource_kunit.c b/kernel/resource_kunit.c
index 42d2d8d20f5d..b8ef75b99eb2 100644
--- a/kernel/resource_kunit.c
+++ b/kernel/resource_kunit.c
@@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ static void resource_test_intersection(struct kunit *test)
 #define RES_TEST_RAM3_SIZE	SZ_1M
 #define RES_TEST_TOTAL_SIZE	((RES_TEST_WIN1_OFFSET + RES_TEST_WIN1_SIZE))
 
+KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kfree_wrapper, kfree, const void *);
+
 static void remove_free_resource(void *ctx)
 {
 	struct resource *res = (struct resource *)ctx;
@@ -177,6 +179,14 @@ static void remove_free_resource(void *ctx)
 	kfree(res);
 }
 
+static void resource_test_add_action_or_abort(
+	struct kunit *test, void (*action)(void *), void *ctx)
+{
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, 0,
+			    kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, action, ctx),
+			    "Fail to add action");
+}
+
 static void resource_test_request_region(struct kunit *test, struct resource *parent,
 					 resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size,
 					 const char *name, unsigned long flags)
@@ -185,7 +195,7 @@ static void resource_test_request_region(struct kunit *test, struct resource *pa
 
 	res = __request_region(parent, start, size, name, flags);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, res);
-	kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, remove_free_resource, res);
+	resource_test_add_action_or_abort(test, remove_free_resource, res);
 }
 
 static void resource_test_insert_resource(struct kunit *test, struct resource *parent,
@@ -202,11 +212,11 @@ static void resource_test_insert_resource(struct kunit *test, struct resource *p
 	res->end = start + size - 1;
 	res->flags = flags;
 	if (insert_resource(parent, res)) {
-		kfree(res);
+		resource_test_add_action_or_abort(test, kfree_wrapper, res);
 		KUNIT_FAIL_AND_ABORT(test, "Fail to insert resource %pR\n", res);
 	}
 
-	kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, remove_free_resource, res);
+	resource_test_add_action_or_abort(test, remove_free_resource, res);
 }
 
 static void resource_test_region_intersects(struct kunit *test)
@@ -220,7 +230,7 @@ static void resource_test_region_intersects(struct kunit *test)
 				       "test resources");
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
 	start = parent->start;
-	kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, remove_free_resource, parent);
+	resource_test_add_action_or_abort(test, remove_free_resource, parent);
 
 	resource_test_request_region(test, parent, start + RES_TEST_RAM0_OFFSET,
 				     RES_TEST_RAM0_SIZE, "Test System RAM 0", flags);
-- 
2.39.2