fs/ext4/resize.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Wesley reported an issue:
==================================================================
EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 7168 to 786432 blocks
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/resize.c:324!
CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3576 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 6.11.0+ #27
RIP: 0010:ext4_resize_fs+0x1212/0x12d0
Call Trace:
__ext4_ioctl+0x4e0/0x1800
ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x99/0xd0
x64_sys_call+0x1206/0x20d0
do_syscall_64+0x72/0x110
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================
While reviewing the patch, Honza found that when adjusting resize_bg in
alloc_flex_gd(), it was possible for flex_gd->resize_bg to be bigger than
flexbg_size.
The reproduction of the problem requires the following:
o_group = flexbg_size * 2 * n;
o_size = (o_group + 1) * group_size;
n_group: [o_group + flexbg_size, o_group + flexbg_size * 2)
o_size = (n_group + 1) * group_size;
Take n=0,flexbg_size=16 as an example:
last:15
|o---------------|--------------n-|
o_group:0 resize to n_group:30
The corresponding reproducer is:
img=test.img
truncate -s 600M $img
mkfs.ext4 -F $img -b 1024 -G 16 8M
dev=`losetup -f --show $img`
mkdir -p /tmp/test
mount $dev /tmp/test
resize2fs $dev 248M
Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE()
to prevent the issue from happening again.
Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com>
Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231
Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/
Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Fixes: 665d3e0af4d3 ("ext4: reduce unnecessary memory allocation in alloc_flex_gd()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
Changes since v1:
* Add missing WARN_ON_ONCE().
* Correct the comment of alloc_flex_gd().
fs/ext4/resize.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index e04eb08b9060..a2704f064361 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ struct ext4_new_flex_group_data {
#define MAX_RESIZE_BG 16384
/*
- * alloc_flex_gd() allocates a ext4_new_flex_group_data with size of
- * @flexbg_size.
+ * alloc_flex_gd() allocates an ext4_new_flex_group_data that satisfies the
+ * resizing from @o_group to @n_group, its size is typically @flexbg_size.
*
* Returns NULL on failure otherwise address of the allocated structure.
*/
@@ -239,25 +239,27 @@ static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size,
ext4_group_t o_group, ext4_group_t n_group)
{
ext4_group_t last_group;
+ unsigned int max_resize_bg;
struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd;
flex_gd = kmalloc(sizeof(*flex_gd), GFP_NOFS);
if (flex_gd == NULL)
goto out3;
- if (unlikely(flexbg_size > MAX_RESIZE_BG))
- flex_gd->resize_bg = MAX_RESIZE_BG;
- else
- flex_gd->resize_bg = flexbg_size;
+ max_resize_bg = umin(flexbg_size, MAX_RESIZE_BG);
+ flex_gd->resize_bg = max_resize_bg;
/* Avoid allocating large 'groups' array if not needed */
last_group = o_group | (flex_gd->resize_bg - 1);
if (n_group <= last_group)
- flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group + 1);
+ flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group);
else if (n_group - last_group < flex_gd->resize_bg)
- flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group + 1),
+ flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group),
fls(n_group - last_group));
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(flex_gd->resize_bg > max_resize_bg))
+ flex_gd->resize_bg = max_resize_bg;
+
flex_gd->groups = kmalloc_array(flex_gd->resize_bg,
sizeof(struct ext4_new_group_data),
GFP_NOFS);
--
2.39.2
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:33:29 +0800, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote: > Wesley reported an issue: > > ================================================================== > EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 7168 to 786432 blocks > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/ext4/resize.c:324! > CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3576 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 6.11.0+ #27 > RIP: 0010:ext4_resize_fs+0x1212/0x12d0 > Call Trace: > __ext4_ioctl+0x4e0/0x1800 > ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20 > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x99/0xd0 > x64_sys_call+0x1206/0x20d0 > do_syscall_64+0x72/0x110 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > ================================================================== > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] ext4: fix off by one issue in alloc_flex_gd() commit: 6121258c2b33ceac3d21f6a221452692c465df88 Best regards, -- Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
On Fri 27-09-24 21:33:29, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote: > From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> > > Wesley reported an issue: > > ================================================================== > EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 7168 to 786432 blocks > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/ext4/resize.c:324! > CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3576 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 6.11.0+ #27 > RIP: 0010:ext4_resize_fs+0x1212/0x12d0 > Call Trace: > __ext4_ioctl+0x4e0/0x1800 > ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20 > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x99/0xd0 > x64_sys_call+0x1206/0x20d0 > do_syscall_64+0x72/0x110 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > ================================================================== > > While reviewing the patch, Honza found that when adjusting resize_bg in > alloc_flex_gd(), it was possible for flex_gd->resize_bg to be bigger than > flexbg_size. > > The reproduction of the problem requires the following: > > o_group = flexbg_size * 2 * n; > o_size = (o_group + 1) * group_size; > n_group: [o_group + flexbg_size, o_group + flexbg_size * 2) > o_size = (n_group + 1) * group_size; > > Take n=0,flexbg_size=16 as an example: > > last:15 > |o---------------|--------------n-| > o_group:0 resize to n_group:30 > > The corresponding reproducer is: > > img=test.img > truncate -s 600M $img > mkfs.ext4 -F $img -b 1024 -G 16 8M > dev=`losetup -f --show $img` > mkdir -p /tmp/test > mount $dev /tmp/test > resize2fs $dev 248M > > Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() > to prevent the issue from happening again. > > Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com> > Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231 > Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/ > Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com> > Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > Fixes: 665d3e0af4d3 ("ext4: reduce unnecessary memory allocation in alloc_flex_gd()") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > --- > Changes since v1: > * Add missing WARN_ON_ONCE(). > * Correct the comment of alloc_flex_gd(). > > fs/ext4/resize.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c > index e04eb08b9060..a2704f064361 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c > @@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ struct ext4_new_flex_group_data { > #define MAX_RESIZE_BG 16384 > > /* > - * alloc_flex_gd() allocates a ext4_new_flex_group_data with size of > - * @flexbg_size. > + * alloc_flex_gd() allocates an ext4_new_flex_group_data that satisfies the > + * resizing from @o_group to @n_group, its size is typically @flexbg_size. > * > * Returns NULL on failure otherwise address of the allocated structure. > */ > @@ -239,25 +239,27 @@ static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size, > ext4_group_t o_group, ext4_group_t n_group) > { > ext4_group_t last_group; > + unsigned int max_resize_bg; > struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *flex_gd; > > flex_gd = kmalloc(sizeof(*flex_gd), GFP_NOFS); > if (flex_gd == NULL) > goto out3; > > - if (unlikely(flexbg_size > MAX_RESIZE_BG)) > - flex_gd->resize_bg = MAX_RESIZE_BG; > - else > - flex_gd->resize_bg = flexbg_size; > + max_resize_bg = umin(flexbg_size, MAX_RESIZE_BG); > + flex_gd->resize_bg = max_resize_bg; > > /* Avoid allocating large 'groups' array if not needed */ > last_group = o_group | (flex_gd->resize_bg - 1); > if (n_group <= last_group) > - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group + 1); > + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group); > else if (n_group - last_group < flex_gd->resize_bg) > - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group + 1), > + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group), > fls(n_group - last_group)); > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(flex_gd->resize_bg > max_resize_bg)) > + flex_gd->resize_bg = max_resize_bg; > + > flex_gd->groups = kmalloc_array(flex_gd->resize_bg, > sizeof(struct ext4_new_group_data), > GFP_NOFS); > -- > 2.39.2 > -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR
On 9/27/24 8:33 AM, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote: > From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> > ... > Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() > to prevent the issue from happening again. > > Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com> > Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231 > Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/ > Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com> > Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> The patch has changed a little since I tested, but it still passes my testcase (as expected, no WARN ON etc) so looks good from that POV, thanks! -Eric
On 2024/9/27 22:14, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 9/27/24 8:33 AM, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote: >> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> >> > ... > >> Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() >> to prevent the issue from happening again. >> >> Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com> >> Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231 >> Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/ >> Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com> >> Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > The patch has changed a little since I tested, but it still passes my testcase > (as expected, no WARN ON etc) so looks good from that POV, thanks! > -Eric Hi Eric, Thanks for testing it again! The core modification logic remains unchanged from before. Just added a max_resize_bg variable for exception fixing. It is necessary to ensure that flex_gd->resize_bg does not exceed the smaller of flexbg_size and MAX_RESIZE_BG before it is used. So we need to record max_resize_bg, warn on resize_bg adjustment logic exceptions, and use max_resize_bg to avoid subsequent resize complaints. -- With Best Regards, Baokun Li
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.