fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Wesley reported an issue:
==================================================================
EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 7168 to 786432 blocks
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/resize.c:324!
CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3576 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 6.11.0+ #27
RIP: 0010:ext4_resize_fs+0x1212/0x12d0
Call Trace:
__ext4_ioctl+0x4e0/0x1800
ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x99/0xd0
x64_sys_call+0x1206/0x20d0
do_syscall_64+0x72/0x110
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================
While reviewing the patch, Honza found that when adjusting resize_bg in
alloc_flex_gd(), it was possible for flex_gd->resize_bg to be bigger than
flexbg_size.
The reproduction of the problem requires the following:
o_group = flexbg_size * 2 * n;
o_size = (o_group + 1) * group_size;
n_group: [o_group + flexbg_size, o_group + flexbg_size * 2)
o_size = (n_group + 1) * group_size;
Take n=0,flexbg_size=16 as an example:
last:15
|o---------------|--------------n-|
o_group:0 resize to n_group:30
The corresponding reproducer is:
img=test.img
truncate -s 600M $img
mkfs.ext4 -F $img -b 1024 -G 16 8M
dev=`losetup -f --show $img`
mkdir -p /tmp/test
mount $dev /tmp/test
resize2fs $dev 248M
Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE()
to prevent the issue from happening again.
Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com>
Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231
Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/
Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Fixes: 665d3e0af4d3 ("ext4: reduce unnecessary memory allocation in alloc_flex_gd()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index e04eb08b9060..397970121d43 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size,
/* Avoid allocating large 'groups' array if not needed */
last_group = o_group | (flex_gd->resize_bg - 1);
if (n_group <= last_group)
- flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group + 1);
+ flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group);
else if (n_group - last_group < flex_gd->resize_bg)
- flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group + 1),
+ flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group),
fls(n_group - last_group));
flex_gd->groups = kmalloc_array(flex_gd->resize_bg,
--
2.46.0
On Fri 27-09-24 14:36:20, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote: > From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> > > Wesley reported an issue: > > ================================================================== > EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 7168 to 786432 blocks > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/ext4/resize.c:324! > CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3576 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 6.11.0+ #27 > RIP: 0010:ext4_resize_fs+0x1212/0x12d0 > Call Trace: > __ext4_ioctl+0x4e0/0x1800 > ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20 > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x99/0xd0 > x64_sys_call+0x1206/0x20d0 > do_syscall_64+0x72/0x110 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > ================================================================== > > While reviewing the patch, Honza found that when adjusting resize_bg in > alloc_flex_gd(), it was possible for flex_gd->resize_bg to be bigger than > flexbg_size. > > The reproduction of the problem requires the following: > > o_group = flexbg_size * 2 * n; > o_size = (o_group + 1) * group_size; > n_group: [o_group + flexbg_size, o_group + flexbg_size * 2) > o_size = (n_group + 1) * group_size; > > Take n=0,flexbg_size=16 as an example: > > last:15 > |o---------------|--------------n-| > o_group:0 resize to n_group:30 > > The corresponding reproducer is: > > img=test.img > truncate -s 600M $img > mkfs.ext4 -F $img -b 1024 -G 16 8M > dev=`losetup -f --show $img` > mkdir -p /tmp/test > mount $dev /tmp/test > resize2fs $dev 248M > > Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() > to prevent the issue from happening again. I don't think you are adding WARN_ON_ONCE() :). Otherwise feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > > Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com> > Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231 > Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/ > Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com> > Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > Fixes: 665d3e0af4d3 ("ext4: reduce unnecessary memory allocation in alloc_flex_gd()") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> > --- > fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c > index e04eb08b9060..397970121d43 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c > @@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size, > /* Avoid allocating large 'groups' array if not needed */ > last_group = o_group | (flex_gd->resize_bg - 1); > if (n_group <= last_group) > - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group + 1); > + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group); > else if (n_group - last_group < flex_gd->resize_bg) > - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group + 1), > + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group), > fls(n_group - last_group)); > > flex_gd->groups = kmalloc_array(flex_gd->resize_bg, > -- > 2.46.0 > -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR
On 2024/9/27 18:56, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 27-09-24 14:36:20, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote: >> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> >> >> Wesley reported an issue: >> >> ================================================================== >> EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 7168 to 786432 blocks >> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> kernel BUG at fs/ext4/resize.c:324! >> CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3576 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 6.11.0+ #27 >> RIP: 0010:ext4_resize_fs+0x1212/0x12d0 >> Call Trace: >> __ext4_ioctl+0x4e0/0x1800 >> ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20 >> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x99/0xd0 >> x64_sys_call+0x1206/0x20d0 >> do_syscall_64+0x72/0x110 >> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e >> ================================================================== >> >> While reviewing the patch, Honza found that when adjusting resize_bg in >> alloc_flex_gd(), it was possible for flex_gd->resize_bg to be bigger than >> flexbg_size. >> >> The reproduction of the problem requires the following: >> >> o_group = flexbg_size * 2 * n; >> o_size = (o_group + 1) * group_size; >> n_group: [o_group + flexbg_size, o_group + flexbg_size * 2) >> o_size = (n_group + 1) * group_size; >> >> Take n=0,flexbg_size=16 as an example: >> >> last:15 >> |o---------------|--------------n-| >> o_group:0 resize to n_group:30 >> >> The corresponding reproducer is: >> >> img=test.img >> truncate -s 600M $img >> mkfs.ext4 -F $img -b 1024 -G 16 8M >> dev=`losetup -f --show $img` >> mkdir -p /tmp/test >> mount $dev /tmp/test >> resize2fs $dev 248M >> >> Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() >> to prevent the issue from happening again. > I don't think you are adding WARN_ON_ONCE() :). Otherwise feel free to add: > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> > > Honza Oh no, I forgot to add the added modifications! 😅 Thank you for your review! I will send out v2. soon. Thanks, Baokun >> Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com> >> Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231 >> Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/ >> Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com> >> Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> >> Fixes: 665d3e0af4d3 ("ext4: reduce unnecessary memory allocation in alloc_flex_gd()") >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> >> --- >> fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c >> index e04eb08b9060..397970121d43 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c >> +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c >> @@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size, >> /* Avoid allocating large 'groups' array if not needed */ >> last_group = o_group | (flex_gd->resize_bg - 1); >> if (n_group <= last_group) >> - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group + 1); >> + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group); >> else if (n_group - last_group < flex_gd->resize_bg) >> - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group + 1), >> + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group), >> fls(n_group - last_group)); >> >> flex_gd->groups = kmalloc_array(flex_gd->resize_bg, >> -- >> 2.46.0 >> -- With Best Regards, Baokun Li
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:39 AM <libaokun@huaweicloud.com> wrote: > > From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> > > Wesley reported an issue: > > ================================================================== > EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 7168 to 786432 blocks > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/ext4/resize.c:324! > CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3576 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 6.11.0+ #27 > RIP: 0010:ext4_resize_fs+0x1212/0x12d0 > Call Trace: > __ext4_ioctl+0x4e0/0x1800 > ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20 > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x99/0xd0 > x64_sys_call+0x1206/0x20d0 > do_syscall_64+0x72/0x110 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e > ================================================================== > > While reviewing the patch, Honza found that when adjusting resize_bg in > alloc_flex_gd(), it was possible for flex_gd->resize_bg to be bigger than > flexbg_size. > > The reproduction of the problem requires the following: > > o_group = flexbg_size * 2 * n; > o_size = (o_group + 1) * group_size; > n_group: [o_group + flexbg_size, o_group + flexbg_size * 2) > o_size = (n_group + 1) * group_size; > > Take n=0,flexbg_size=16 as an example: > > last:15 > |o---------------|--------------n-| > o_group:0 resize to n_group:30 > > The corresponding reproducer is: > > img=test.img > truncate -s 600M $img > mkfs.ext4 -F $img -b 1024 -G 16 8M > dev=`losetup -f --show $img` > mkdir -p /tmp/test > mount $dev /tmp/test > resize2fs $dev 248M > > Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() > to prevent the issue from happening again. > > Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com> > Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231 > Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/ > Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com> > Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > Fixes: 665d3e0af4d3 ("ext4: reduce unnecessary memory allocation in alloc_flex_gd()") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Thanks, Baokun! JFYI, I'm on the way to submit a test to xfstests suite. Kind regards, Alex > --- > fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c > index e04eb08b9060..397970121d43 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c > @@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size, > /* Avoid allocating large 'groups' array if not needed */ > last_group = o_group | (flex_gd->resize_bg - 1); > if (n_group <= last_group) > - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group + 1); > + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group); > else if (n_group - last_group < flex_gd->resize_bg) > - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group + 1), > + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group), > fls(n_group - last_group)); > > flex_gd->groups = kmalloc_array(flex_gd->resize_bg, > -- > 2.46.0 >
On 2024/9/27 16:22, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:39 AM <libaokun@huaweicloud.com> wrote: >> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> >> >> Wesley reported an issue: >> >> ================================================================== >> EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 7168 to 786432 blocks >> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> kernel BUG at fs/ext4/resize.c:324! >> CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3576 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 6.11.0+ #27 >> RIP: 0010:ext4_resize_fs+0x1212/0x12d0 >> Call Trace: >> __ext4_ioctl+0x4e0/0x1800 >> ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20 >> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x99/0xd0 >> x64_sys_call+0x1206/0x20d0 >> do_syscall_64+0x72/0x110 >> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e >> ================================================================== >> >> While reviewing the patch, Honza found that when adjusting resize_bg in >> alloc_flex_gd(), it was possible for flex_gd->resize_bg to be bigger than >> flexbg_size. >> >> The reproduction of the problem requires the following: >> >> o_group = flexbg_size * 2 * n; >> o_size = (o_group + 1) * group_size; >> n_group: [o_group + flexbg_size, o_group + flexbg_size * 2) >> o_size = (n_group + 1) * group_size; >> >> Take n=0,flexbg_size=16 as an example: >> >> last:15 >> |o---------------|--------------n-| >> o_group:0 resize to n_group:30 >> >> The corresponding reproducer is: >> >> img=test.img >> truncate -s 600M $img >> mkfs.ext4 -F $img -b 1024 -G 16 8M >> dev=`losetup -f --show $img` >> mkdir -p /tmp/test >> mount $dev /tmp/test >> resize2fs $dev 248M >> >> Delete the problematic plus 1 to fix the issue, and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() >> to prevent the issue from happening again. >> >> Reported-by: Wesley Hershberger <wesley.hershberger@canonical.com> >> Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2081231 >> Reported-by: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@stgraber.org> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240925143325.518508-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/ >> Tested-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com> >> Tested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> >> Fixes: 665d3e0af4d3 ("ext4: reduce unnecessary memory allocation in alloc_flex_gd()") >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> > Thanks, Baokun! > > JFYI, I'm on the way to submit a test to xfstests suite. > > Kind regards, > Alex Okay. Thanks for doing this. Cheers, Baokun >> --- >> fs/ext4/resize.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c >> index e04eb08b9060..397970121d43 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c >> +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c >> @@ -253,9 +253,9 @@ static struct ext4_new_flex_group_data *alloc_flex_gd(unsigned int flexbg_size, >> /* Avoid allocating large 'groups' array if not needed */ >> last_group = o_group | (flex_gd->resize_bg - 1); >> if (n_group <= last_group) >> - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group + 1); >> + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << fls(n_group - o_group); >> else if (n_group - last_group < flex_gd->resize_bg) >> - flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group + 1), >> + flex_gd->resize_bg = 1 << max(fls(last_group - o_group), >> fls(n_group - last_group)); >> >> flex_gd->groups = kmalloc_array(flex_gd->resize_bg, >> -- >> 2.46.0 >> -- With Best Regards, Baokun Li
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.