kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
would happen.
Some workloads (like the hackbench reported by lkp) do not like
over-scheduling. We can see that the preemption rate has been
increased by 2.2%:
1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
Restore its previous check criterion.
Fixes: 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231416.9403c2e9-oliver.sang@intel.com
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
v1->v2:
Check cfs_rq->nr_running instead of rq->nr_running(K Prateek Nayak)
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 225b31aaee55..53a351b18740 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
- if (rq->nr_running == 1)
+ if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
return;
if (resched || did_preempt_short(cfs_rq, curr)) {
--
2.25.1On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 04:54:40PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
> the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
> to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
> when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
> that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
> 85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
> 85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
> would happen.
>
So I'm applying the patch (that change was not indended), but I'm a
little confused by the above description. If we already have TIF_RESCHED
set, then doing resched_curr() should be a NO-OP.
At the same time, how can we have an RT task and not get TIF_RESCHED
set.
On 2024-09-30 at 09:50:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 04:54:40PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> > introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
> > the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
> > to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
> > when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
> > that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
> > 85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
> > 85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
> > would happen.
> >
>
> So I'm applying the patch (that change was not indended), but I'm a
> little confused by the above description. If we already have TIF_RESCHED
> set, then doing resched_curr() should be a NO-OP.
>
> At the same time, how can we have an RT task and not get TIF_RESCHED
> set.
You are right, the curr should have TIF_RESCHED set if there is
RT in the rq, because after the RT task is enqueued, wakeup_preempt()
should set TIF_RESCHED for current CFS task. The 1 RT + 1 CFS task
was just suspicion when trying to figure out why commit 85e511df3cec
increased preemption. (besides the suspicion of
did_preempt_short() -> entity_eligible().) and the test patch
seems to recover the performance 0day reported, so we did not chase
from did_preempt_short().
Another scenario I'm thinking of to increase preemption regarding the
nr_running check might be(and per Honglei's feedback):
There is 1 cfs task p1 in the current cfs_rq1, and 1 cfs task
p2 in the parent cfs_rq2. The rq->nr_running is 2, and the p1's
cfs_rq1->nr_running is 1. Before the commit, there is no preemption
on cfs_rq1, after the commit, p1 is set to TIF_RESCHED and the CPU
reschedule from topdown and pick p2.
thanks,
Chenyu
On 2024/9/25 16:54, Chen Yu wrote:
> Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
> the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
> to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
> when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
> that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
> 85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
> 85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
> would happen.
>
> Some workloads (like the hackbench reported by lkp) do not like
> over-scheduling. We can see that the preemption rate has been
> increased by 2.2%:
>
> 1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
>
> Restore its previous check criterion.
>
> Fixes: 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231416.9403c2e9-oliver.sang@intel.com
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> Check cfs_rq->nr_running instead of rq->nr_running(K Prateek Nayak)
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 225b31aaee55..53a351b18740 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>
> account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
>
> - if (rq->nr_running == 1)
> + if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
> return;
>
Hi Yu,
I'm wondering if commit 85e511df3cec wants to give more chances to do
resched just in case there are 'short slices' tasks ready in the other
cfs hierarchy. Does something like rq->cfs->nr_running == 1 make more
sense? But maybe it helps less than 'cfs_rq->nr_running == 1' in this
hackbench case.
Thanks,
Honglei
> if (resched || did_preempt_short(cfs_rq, curr)) {
Hello Honglei,
On 2024-09-27 at 09:54:28 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/9/25 16:54, Chen Yu wrote:
> > Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> > introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
> > the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
> > to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
> > when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
> > that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
> > 85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
> > 85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
> > would happen.
> >
> > Some workloads (like the hackbench reported by lkp) do not like
> > over-scheduling. We can see that the preemption rate has been
> > increased by 2.2%:
> >
> > 1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >
> > Restore its previous check criterion.
> >
> > Fixes: 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231416.9403c2e9-oliver.sang@intel.com
> > Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> > Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v1->v2:
> > Check cfs_rq->nr_running instead of rq->nr_running(K Prateek Nayak)
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 225b31aaee55..53a351b18740 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
> > - if (rq->nr_running == 1)
> > + if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
> > return;
> Hi Yu,
>
> I'm wondering if commit 85e511df3cec wants to give more chances to do
> resched just in case there are 'short slices' tasks ready in the other cfs
> hierarchy.
> Does something like rq->cfs->nr_running == 1 make more sense? But
> maybe it helps less than 'cfs_rq->nr_running == 1' in this hackbench case.
>
Thanks for taking a look.
It could be possible that Peter wanted the short tasks to preempt other quickly.
If I understand correctly, when we say preemption, we usually consider two
tasks which are in the same cfs_rq(level). For example, check_preempt_wakeup_fair()
iterates the hierarchy from down-up until the current task and the wakee are in the
same level via find_matching_se(&se, &pse), then check if the wakee can preempt the
current. This should be consistent with the tick preemption in update_curr(). And
whether the short task should preempt the current is checked by
update_curr() -> did_preempt_short(), rather than checking the cfs_rq->nr_running/nr_h_running
I suppose.
Thanks,
Chenyu
On 2024/9/27 14:56, Chen Yu wrote:
> Hello Honglei,
>
> On 2024-09-27 at 09:54:28 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024/9/25 16:54, Chen Yu wrote:
>>> Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
>>> introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
>>> the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
>>> to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
>>> when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
>>> that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
>>> 85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
>>> 85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
>>> would happen.
>>>
>>> Some workloads (like the hackbench reported by lkp) do not like
>>> over-scheduling. We can see that the preemption rate has been
>>> increased by 2.2%:
>>>
>>> 1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
>>>
>>> Restore its previous check criterion.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231416.9403c2e9-oliver.sang@intel.com
>>> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
>>> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> v1->v2:
>>> Check cfs_rq->nr_running instead of rq->nr_running(K Prateek Nayak)
>>> ---
>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> index 225b31aaee55..53a351b18740 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>>> account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
>>> - if (rq->nr_running == 1)
>>> + if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
>>> return;
>> Hi Yu,
>>
>> I'm wondering if commit 85e511df3cec wants to give more chances to do
>> resched just in case there are 'short slices' tasks ready in the other cfs
>> hierarchy.
>> Does something like rq->cfs->nr_running == 1 make more sense? But
>> maybe it helps less than 'cfs_rq->nr_running == 1' in this hackbench case.
>>
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> It could be possible that Peter wanted the short tasks to preempt other quickly.
> If I understand correctly, when we say preemption, we usually consider two
> tasks which are in the same cfs_rq(level). For example, check_preempt_wakeup_fair()
> iterates the hierarchy from down-up until the current task and the wakee are in the
> same level via find_matching_se(&se, &pse), then check if the wakee can preempt the
> current. This should be consistent with the tick preemption in update_curr(). And
> whether the short task should preempt the current is checked by
> update_curr() -> did_preempt_short(), rather than checking the cfs_rq->nr_running/nr_h_running
> I suppose.
>
Hi Yu,
Yep, I understand the preemption should happen in the same cfs level.
Just not sure the purpose of the 'nr_running check' stuff. Perhaps its
role is just to judge whether it’s necessary to do the preemption check.
If there is at least one more ready (cfs) task in the rq and current is
not eligible, we take care of the waiting tasks. Thoughts?
Thanks,
Honglei
> Thanks,
> Chenyu
Hi Honglei,
On 2024-09-27 at 21:38:53 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/9/27 14:56, Chen Yu wrote:
> > Hello Honglei,
> >
> > On 2024-09-27 at 09:54:28 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2024/9/25 16:54, Chen Yu wrote:
> > > > Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> > > > introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
> > > > the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
> > > > to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
> > > > when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
> > > > that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
> > > > 85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
> > > > 85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
> > > > would happen.
> > > >
> > > > Some workloads (like the hackbench reported by lkp) do not like
> > > > over-scheduling. We can see that the preemption rate has been
> > > > increased by 2.2%:
> > > >
> > > > 1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> > > >
> > > > Restore its previous check criterion.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231416.9403c2e9-oliver.sang@intel.com
> > > > Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> > > > Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v1->v2:
> > > > Check cfs_rq->nr_running instead of rq->nr_running(K Prateek Nayak)
> > > > ---
> > > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > > index 225b31aaee55..53a351b18740 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > > @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > > > account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
> > > > - if (rq->nr_running == 1)
> > > > + if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
> > > > return;
> > > Hi Yu,
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if commit 85e511df3cec wants to give more chances to do
> > > resched just in case there are 'short slices' tasks ready in the other cfs
> > > hierarchy.
> > > Does something like rq->cfs->nr_running == 1 make more sense? But
> > > maybe it helps less than 'cfs_rq->nr_running == 1' in this hackbench case.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for taking a look.
> >
> > It could be possible that Peter wanted the short tasks to preempt other quickly.
> > If I understand correctly, when we say preemption, we usually consider two
> > tasks which are in the same cfs_rq(level). For example, check_preempt_wakeup_fair()
> > iterates the hierarchy from down-up until the current task and the wakee are in the
> > same level via find_matching_se(&se, &pse), then check if the wakee can preempt the
> > current. This should be consistent with the tick preemption in update_curr(). And
> > whether the short task should preempt the current is checked by
> > update_curr() -> did_preempt_short(), rather than checking the cfs_rq->nr_running/nr_h_running
> > I suppose.
> >
> Hi Yu,
>
> Yep, I understand the preemption should happen in the same cfs level. Just
> not sure the purpose of the 'nr_running check' stuff. Perhaps its role is
> just to judge whether it’s necessary to do the preemption check. If there is
> at least one more ready (cfs) task in the rq and current is not eligible, we
> take care of the waiting tasks. Thoughts?
I got your point and it makes sense. Whether the preemption check should be triggered
seems to be a heuristic trade-off to me. I'm ok with using more aggressive preemption
strategy as it depends on whether that workload prefers latency or throughput, and as
long as it did not introduce regression :-)
Oliver, may I know if you happen to have time for a test if the following change
suggested by Honglei would make the regression go away? Thanks.
thanks,
Chenyu
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index fd2f3831c74e..290e5fdfc267 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
- if (rq->nr_running == 1)
+ if (rq->cfs.nr_running == 1)
return;
if (resched || did_preempt_short(cfs_rq, curr)) {
--
2.25.1
hi, Chenyu and Honglei,
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:28:30PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> Hi Honglei,
>
> On 2024-09-27 at 21:38:53 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
> > Hi Yu,
> >
> > Yep, I understand the preemption should happen in the same cfs level. Just
> > not sure the purpose of the 'nr_running check' stuff. Perhaps its role is
> > just to judge whether it’s necessary to do the preemption check. If there is
> > at least one more ready (cfs) task in the rq and current is not eligible, we
> > take care of the waiting tasks. Thoughts?
>
> I got your point and it makes sense. Whether the preemption check should be triggered
> seems to be a heuristic trade-off to me. I'm ok with using more aggressive preemption
> strategy as it depends on whether that workload prefers latency or throughput, and as
> long as it did not introduce regression :-)
>
> Oliver, may I know if you happen to have time for a test if the following change
> suggested by Honglei would make the regression go away? Thanks.
I applied the patch directly upon 85e511df3cec, the test found it can reduce the
regression but not totally reovered
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/ipc/iterations/kconfig/mode/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/testcase:
gcc-12/performance/socket/4/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/50%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-spr-r02/hackbench
commit:
82e9d0456e06 ("sched/fair: Avoid re-setting virtual deadline on 'migrations'")
85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
8079496d311b <--- patch from Honglei
82e9d0456e06cebe 85e511df3cec46021024176672a 8079496d311b6b0d4dae973f4df
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
623219 -13.1% 541887 -3.2% 603080 hackbench.throughput
>
> thanks,
> Chenyu
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index fd2f3831c74e..290e5fdfc267 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>
> account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
>
> - if (rq->nr_running == 1)
> + if (rq->cfs.nr_running == 1)
> return;
>
> if (resched || did_preempt_short(cfs_rq, curr)) {
> --
> 2.25.1
below is full comparison FYI.
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/ipc/iterations/kconfig/mode/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/testcase:
gcc-12/performance/socket/4/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/50%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-spr-r02/hackbench
commit:
82e9d0456e06 ("sched/fair: Avoid re-setting virtual deadline on 'migrations'")
85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
8079496d311b <--- patch from Honglei
82e9d0456e06cebe 85e511df3cec46021024176672a 8079496d311b6b0d4dae973f4df
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
150791 ± 3% -3.9% 144868 ± 2% -8.4% 138189 ± 3% perf-c2c.HITM.local
217.40 +13.5% 246.74 +1.9% 221.55 uptime.boot
4679401 -15.8% 3938145 +35.5% 6342833 vmstat.system.cs
854648 -15.2% 724774 +35.0% 1153448 vmstat.system.in
0.46 ± 2% -0.1 0.40 +0.1 0.51 ± 2% mpstat.cpu.all.irq%
0.03 ± 3% -0.0 0.03 +0.0 0.04 mpstat.cpu.all.soft%
3.35 -0.6 2.75 +0.3 3.65 mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
922628 ± 16% +17.2% 1080933 ± 14% +87.9% 1733278 ± 14% numa-numastat.node0.local_node
1027104 ± 13% +17.6% 1207529 ± 15% +82.3% 1872582 ± 14% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
2553206 ± 16% +0.4% 2563309 ± 10% +46.3% 3735450 ± 4% numa-numastat.node1.local_node
2684151 ± 16% -0.4% 2672834 ± 8% +43.2% 3843864 ± 5% numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit
174.58 +16.3% 203.09 +2.1% 178.28 time.elapsed_time
174.58 +16.3% 203.09 +2.1% 178.28 time.elapsed_time.max
1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 +50.7% 2.492e+08 time.involuntary_context_switches
36869 +17.6% 43340 +1.6% 37461 time.system_time
1172 -5.5% 1107 +8.9% 1276 time.user_time
6.478e+08 -3.5% 6.255e+08 +36.2% 8.824e+08 ± 2% time.voluntary_context_switches
8177075 ± 14% +8.6% 8880848 ± 13% +47.8% 12086160 ± 2% meminfo.Cached
7771720 ± 15% +9.5% 8506289 ± 13% +50.8% 11720513 ± 2% meminfo.Committed_AS
4992416 ± 31% +17.9% 5883734 ± 19% +83.6% 9165655 ± 2% meminfo.Inactive
4992203 ± 31% +17.9% 5883521 ± 19% +83.6% 9165427 ± 2% meminfo.Inactive(anon)
2281337 ± 19% +17.2% 2673418 ± 4% +38.0% 3147813 ± 3% meminfo.Mapped
12824178 ± 10% +5.9% 13577581 ± 8% +30.4% 16717964 meminfo.Memused
5084291 ± 22% +13.8% 5788029 ± 20% +76.9% 8993338 ± 2% meminfo.Shmem
13135346 ± 9% +5.2% 13824666 ± 8% +29.2% 16968485 meminfo.max_used_kB
3089827 ± 31% +15.4% 3565461 ± 7% +49.8% 4628448 ± 10% numa-meminfo.node0.FilePages
5391461 ± 19% +16.5% 6281524 ± 6% +31.1% 7067023 ± 10% numa-meminfo.node0.MemUsed
352581 ± 13% +24.6% 439472 ± 16% +11.3% 392488 ± 14% numa-meminfo.node0.SUnreclaim
5090008 ± 22% +4.5% 5317103 ± 18% +46.6% 7462041 ± 3% numa-meminfo.node1.FilePages
4237429 ± 32% +13.8% 4822257 ± 21% +66.3% 7045772 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive
4237311 ± 32% +13.8% 4822122 ± 21% +66.3% 7045629 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive(anon)
1875959 ± 20% +18.1% 2215441 ± 5% +44.6% 2711735 ± 3% numa-meminfo.node1.Mapped
7434746 ± 16% -1.8% 7298189 ± 12% +29.9% 9655790 ± 5% numa-meminfo.node1.MemUsed
4692017 ± 22% +10.5% 5186768 ± 18% +55.8% 7310040 ± 4% numa-meminfo.node1.Shmem
623219 -13.1% 541887 -3.2% 603080 hackbench.throughput
606251 -14.1% 520789 -2.1% 593622 hackbench.throughput_avg
623219 -13.1% 541887 -3.2% 603080 hackbench.throughput_best
580034 -14.8% 494354 +0.4% 582377 hackbench.throughput_worst
174.58 +16.3% 203.09 +2.1% 178.28 hackbench.time.elapsed_time
174.58 +16.3% 203.09 +2.1% 178.28 hackbench.time.elapsed_time.max
1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 +50.7% 2.492e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
36869 +17.6% 43340 +1.6% 37461 hackbench.time.system_time
1172 -5.5% 1107 +8.9% 1276 hackbench.time.user_time
6.478e+08 -3.5% 6.255e+08 +36.2% 8.824e+08 ± 2% hackbench.time.voluntary_context_switches
772255 ± 31% +15.4% 891384 ± 7% +49.8% 1156899 ± 10% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_file_pages
1025412 ± 13% +17.7% 1206842 ± 15% +82.6% 1871921 ± 14% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
920942 ± 16% +17.3% 1080247 ± 14% +88.1% 1732619 ± 14% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_local
1271682 ± 22% +4.5% 1328902 ± 18% +46.6% 1863679 ± 3% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_file_pages
1059760 ± 32% +13.7% 1205295 ± 21% +66.1% 1759754 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_inactive_anon
469078 ± 20% +18.0% 553505 ± 5% +44.2% 676623 ± 3% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_mapped
1172184 ± 22% +10.6% 1296319 ± 18% +55.8% 1825678 ± 4% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_shmem
1059759 ± 32% +13.7% 1205294 ± 21% +66.1% 1759752 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_inactive_anon
2682254 ± 16% -0.4% 2671316 ± 8% +43.3% 3842866 ± 5% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_hit
2551311 ± 16% +0.4% 2561794 ± 10% +46.4% 3734454 ± 4% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_local
6233000 -0.3% 6214123 -1.6% 6135664 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty_background_threshold
12481241 -0.3% 12443440 -1.6% 12286330 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty_threshold
2044616 ± 14% +8.6% 2220456 ± 13% +47.8% 3022899 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages
62706078 -0.3% 62517035 -1.6% 61731279 proc-vmstat.nr_free_pages
1247557 ± 31% +17.9% 1471046 ± 19% +83.8% 2292396 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_anon
570709 ± 19% +17.2% 668608 ± 4% +38.0% 787666 ± 3% proc-vmstat.nr_mapped
1271419 ± 23% +13.8% 1447250 ± 20% +76.9% 2249692 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
44542 +2.7% 45755 +5.1% 46796 proc-vmstat.nr_slab_reclaimable
188881 -0.7% 187493 +1.4% 191440 proc-vmstat.nr_slab_unreclaimable
1247557 ± 31% +17.9% 1471046 ± 19% +83.8% 2292396 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_anon
3714588 ± 9% +6.5% 3954189 ± 12% +54.0% 5719994 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
3479163 ± 10% +4.8% 3645729 ± 9% +57.3% 5472276 proc-vmstat.numa_local
642130 ± 68% -71.2% 184909 ± 11% -73.9% 167609 ± 14% proc-vmstat.pgactivate
4593887 ± 7% +1.2% 4650141 ± 7% +131.4% 10629624 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
2170433 ± 2% +6.8% 2318318 ± 2% +6.4% 2308275 ± 5% proc-vmstat.pgfault
2631626 ± 7% -8.8% 2400780 +177.3% 7298788 proc-vmstat.pgfree
138302 ± 4% +6.7% 147631 ± 3% -0.7% 137382 ± 4% proc-vmstat.pgreuse
0.30 ± 3% -4.9% 0.28 ± 2% +20.7% 0.36 perf-stat.i.MPKI
6.354e+10 -11.4% 5.63e+10 +2.2% 6.497e+10 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
0.53 -0.0 0.52 +0.0 0.57 perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
3.226e+08 -12.5% 2.822e+08 +9.2% 3.523e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
3.91 ± 3% -0.2 3.74 ± 2% +0.9 4.80 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
94557935 ± 3% -15.2% 80197744 ± 2% +25.1% 1.183e+08 perf-stat.i.cache-misses
2.563e+09 -13.7% 2.212e+09 +1.3% 2.596e+09 perf-stat.i.cache-references
4710895 -15.9% 3959720 +36.7% 6439647 perf-stat.i.context-switches
1.86 +14.3% 2.13 -0.8% 1.85 perf-stat.i.cpi
224291 +0.0% 224353 +1.4% 227521 perf-stat.i.cpu-clock
6.345e+11 +0.4% 6.368e+11 +1.3% 6.424e+11 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
601598 -15.0% 511540 +13.7% 683759 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations
7390 ± 5% +28.4% 9492 ± 2% -23.5% 5655 perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
3.408e+11 -12.1% 2.997e+11 +2.1% 3.478e+11 perf-stat.i.instructions
0.54 -12.2% 0.47 +0.8% 0.55 perf-stat.i.ipc
23.73 -15.9% 19.95 +32.3% 31.39 perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
224291 +0.0% 224353 +1.4% 227521 perf-stat.i.task-clock
0.25 ± 35% +8.1% 0.27 ± 2% +38.0% 0.34 perf-stat.overall.MPKI
0.45 ± 35% +0.1 0.50 +0.1 0.54 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
3.26 ± 35% +0.3 3.60 +1.3 4.54 perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
1.66 ± 35% +28.5% 2.13 +11.6% 1.85 perf-stat.overall.cpi
6006 ± 35% +33.5% 8020 ± 2% -9.1% 5458 perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.48 ± 35% -1.5% 0.47 +13.4% 0.54 perf-stat.overall.ipc
2.847e+08 ± 35% -1.6% 2.802e+08 +21.1% 3.448e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
83193631 ± 35% -5.0% 79040711 ± 2% +38.7% 1.154e+08 perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
4153465 ± 35% -5.4% 3930147 +52.2% 6323104 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
531469 ± 35% -4.7% 506531 +26.2% 670740 ± 2% perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations
5.287e+13 ± 35% +15.1% 6.083e+13 +15.6% 6.114e+13 perf-stat.total.instructions
13829361 +51.8% 20989754 +6.0% 14655040 ± 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.avg
18756074 ± 5% +44.2% 27055241 ± 3% +3.8% 19470555 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.max
12499623 ± 2% +52.4% 19043277 ± 2% +8.0% 13493604 ± 14% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.min
8.93 ± 2% +14.1% 10.19 -5.2% 8.47 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.h_nr_running.avg
4.68 ± 3% +10.0% 5.15 ± 2% -1.5% 4.62 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.h_nr_running.stddev
0.44 ± 35% +75.8% 0.78 ± 19% -1.6% 0.44 ± 50% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.min
13829361 +51.8% 20989754 +6.0% 14655040 ± 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.avg
18756074 ± 5% +44.2% 27055241 ± 3% +3.8% 19470555 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max
12499623 ± 2% +52.4% 19043277 ± 2% +8.0% 13493604 ± 14% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.min
0.68 +11.7% 0.76 -1.3% 0.67 ± 2% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_running.avg
176.30 ± 3% -22.8% 136.16 ± 4% -2.9% 171.17 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_avg.max
176.30 ± 3% -22.8% 136.16 ± 4% -2.9% 171.17 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.util_avg.max
8995 +16.0% 10437 -5.7% 8484 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.avg
18978 ± 6% +13.7% 21579 ± 6% -10.1% 17066 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.max
2890 ± 4% +13.9% 3292 ± 3% -1.5% 2848 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.stddev
1094 ± 3% +2.9% 1125 ± 3% +72.4% 1886 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est.avg
4561 ± 14% +19.8% 5464 ± 19% +50.2% 6850 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est.max
816.44 ± 6% +7.4% 877.16 ± 4% +78.4% 1456 ± 4% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est.stddev
415209 ± 22% -23.3% 318311 ± 3% -8.8% 378602 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.avg
102333 ± 2% +30.5% 133496 ± 2% +4.0% 106415 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu.clock.avg
102519 ± 2% +30.4% 133722 ± 2% +4.0% 106590 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.clock.max
102127 ± 2% +30.5% 133254 ± 2% +4.0% 106199 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu.clock.min
101839 ± 2% +30.5% 132880 ± 2% +4.0% 105862 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.avg
102169 ± 2% +30.4% 133268 ± 2% +3.9% 106186 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.max
87129 ± 2% +35.6% 118117 ± 2% +4.6% 91152 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.min
11573 +32.4% 15327 -0.3% 11534 sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.avg
14704 +23.9% 18214 +3.2% 15178 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.max
1516 ± 9% +16.4% 1765 ± 10% +33.3% 2021 ± 44% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.stddev
8.92 ± 2% +14.1% 10.18 -5.2% 8.46 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.avg
4.69 ± 2% +10.0% 5.16 ± 2% -1.7% 4.61 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.stddev
1232815 ± 2% +27.3% 1569099 +45.1% 1789014 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
1411362 ± 5% +26.8% 1789325 ± 3% +48.6% 2097828 ± 20% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.max
1045767 ± 2% +27.3% 1331341 ± 3% +42.5% 1489877 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min
102127 ± 2% +30.5% 133250 ± 2% +4.0% 106198 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu_clk
101071 ± 2% +30.8% 132194 ± 2% +4.0% 105143 ± 9% sched_debug.ktime
0.00 -25.0% 0.00 -3.1% 0.00 ± 8% sched_debug.rt_rq:.rt_nr_running.avg
0.33 -25.0% 0.25 -3.1% 0.32 ± 8% sched_debug.rt_rq:.rt_nr_running.max
0.02 -25.0% 0.02 -3.1% 0.02 ± 8% sched_debug.rt_rq:.rt_nr_running.stddev
102997 ± 2% +30.2% 134142 ± 2% +4.0% 107069 ± 9% sched_debug.sched_clk
16347631 +100.0% 32695263 +100.0% 32695263 sched_debug.sysctl_sched.sysctl_sched_features
3.31 ±123% -42.6% 1.90 ± 86% -89.1% 0.36 ± 88% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__alloc_pages_noprof.alloc_pages_mpol_noprof.folio_alloc_mpol_noprof.shmem_alloc_folio
8.46 ± 38% +100.8% 16.98 ± 82% -85.1% 1.26 ±134% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof
5.72 ± 38% +21.2% 6.93 ± 80% -85.6% 0.83 ± 85% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.allocate_slab.___slab_alloc
7.88 ± 21% +11.3% 8.77 ± 59% -89.0% 0.87 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
7.16 ± 36% -24.4% 5.42 ± 73% -70.7% 2.10 ± 66% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
28.76 ±142% -62.8% 10.70 ±198% -99.4% 0.18 ±233% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.stop_two_cpus.migrate_swap.task_numa_migrate
3.75 ± 24% +0.6% 3.77 ± 59% -62.1% 1.42 ± 39% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
10.26 ± 19% -9.5% 9.29 ± 62% -74.3% 2.64 ± 40% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
2.82 ± 43% -22.6% 2.18 ± 73% -83.9% 0.45 ± 59% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
2.30 ± 29% -4.8% 2.19 ± 61% -72.3% 0.64 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
1.75 ± 49% -5.1% 1.66 ± 65% -61.1% 0.68 ± 39% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.mutex_lock.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
4.13 ± 87% +0.3% 4.15 ± 88% -86.0% 0.58 ±133% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.shmem_inode_acct_blocks.shmem_alloc_and_add_folio.shmem_get_folio_gfp.shmem_write_begin
2.81 ± 59% -20.7% 2.23 ± 61% -72.8% 0.76 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.task_work_run.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
9.13 ± 30% +0.5% 9.17 ± 67% -87.4% 1.15 ± 53% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
9.94 ± 32% -38.3% 6.13 ± 62% -56.9% 4.28 ± 37% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi.[unknown].[unknown]
11.06 ± 57% -45.0% 6.08 ± 75% -90.4% 1.06 ± 60% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
16.36 ± 24% -23.9% 12.45 ± 59% -53.7% 7.57 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
1.77 ± 23% -28.5% 1.26 ± 60% -66.1% 0.60 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
2.66 ± 21% -15.5% 2.25 ± 58% -63.8% 0.96 ± 37% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.[unknown]
226.74 ±108% -40.0% 136.06 ±120% -95.1% 11.09 ± 91% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.worker_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm
1412 ± 25% -7.0% 1313 ± 66% -83.6% 231.23 ± 47% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
1221 ± 4% -23.0% 940.87 ± 58% -51.1% 596.88 ± 89% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
262.66 ±176% -72.1% 73.22 ±239% -99.9% 0.35 ±248% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.stop_two_cpus.migrate_swap.task_numa_migrate
779.32 ± 29% -15.9% 655.34 ± 72% -80.4% 152.55 ± 45% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
1042 ± 23% -8.4% 954.56 ± 63% -81.8% 190.25 ± 44% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
463.55 ± 83% -3.7% 446.18 ± 87% -85.8% 65.73 ± 93% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
1128 ± 17% -17.7% 928.10 ± 62% -81.0% 214.51 ± 40% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
500.79 ± 50% -25.9% 370.90 ± 79% -76.0% 120.40 ± 46% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.mutex_lock.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
744.38 ± 27% +0.4% 747.54 ± 78% -86.3% 102.18 ± 71% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
579.24 ± 43% -10.1% 520.76 ± 62% -65.3% 201.13 ± 62% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
1945 ± 16% -15.9% 1635 ± 61% -73.4% 516.65 ± 40% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
1530 ± 22% -7.2% 1420 ± 63% -75.5% 375.37 ± 40% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
3.03 ± 23% -26.5% 2.23 ± 59% -65.2% 1.05 ± 38% perf-sched.total_sch_delay.average.ms
8.72 ± 23% -28.5% 6.23 ± 59% -64.2% 3.12 ± 38% perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.average.ms
8284 ± 27% -38.2% 5118 ± 60% -41.6% 4839 ± 44% perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.max.ms
5.68 ± 23% -29.6% 4.00 ± 59% -63.7% 2.06 ± 38% perf-sched.total_wait_time.average.ms
5811 ± 8% -28.5% 4155 ± 59% -27.8% 4194 ± 38% perf-sched.total_wait_time.max.ms
37.25 ± 91% +17.8% 43.88 ± 72% -90.7% 3.45 ±136% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof
44.86 ± 74% +10.0% 49.33 ±117% -95.6% 1.99 ±132% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.allocate_slab.___slab_alloc
22.30 ± 21% +6.1% 23.66 ± 59% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
17.29 ± 21% -28.7% 12.33 ± 66% -60.1% 6.90 ± 45% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
28.98 ± 21% -13.8% 24.98 ± 61% -74.3% 7.45 ± 39% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
27.08 ± 28% -10.4% 24.27 ± 64% -93.8% 1.69 ±129% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
27.52 ± 28% -37.8% 17.11 ± 61% -54.9% 12.40 ± 37% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi.[unknown].[unknown]
38.19 ± 43% -40.4% 22.76 ± 65% -80.4% 7.50 ± 40% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
45.63 ± 24% -25.8% 33.84 ± 59% -53.4% 21.28 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
5.06 ± 24% -30.6% 3.51 ± 60% -65.6% 1.74 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
7.23 ± 22% -18.4% 5.90 ± 59% -64.2% 2.59 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.[unknown]
17219 ± 26% +18.6% 20422 ± 60% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
287.02 ± 72% -56.9% 123.78 ± 90% -90.0% 28.73 ±130% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.allocate_slab.___slab_alloc
2851 ± 25% -5.3% 2699 ± 64% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
2443 ± 4% -23.0% 1881 ± 58% -37.8% 1519 ± 53% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
2132 ± 23% -9.7% 1925 ± 63% -82.0% 384.48 ± 45% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
3449 ± 45% -35.6% 2220 ± 71% -59.1% 1410 ± 49% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.do_wait.kernel_wait4.__do_sys_wait4.do_syscall_64
1507 ± 27% +0.2% 1510 ± 79% -93.3% 101.36 ±137% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
1312 ± 35% -16.4% 1097 ± 61% -65.2% 456.55 ± 64% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
3951 ± 16% -17.0% 3278 ± 61% -73.7% 1038 ± 40% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
3088 ± 22% -7.9% 2844 ± 62% -75.1% 768.96 ± 41% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
3.31 ±123% -42.6% 1.90 ± 86% -89.1% 0.36 ± 88% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__alloc_pages_noprof.alloc_pages_mpol_noprof.folio_alloc_mpol_noprof.shmem_alloc_folio
28.79 ±114% -6.6% 26.89 ± 70% -90.2% 2.82 ± 96% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof
39.14 ± 89% +8.3% 42.40 ±140% -95.1% 1.92 ± 78% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.allocate_slab.___slab_alloc
14.42 ± 21% +3.3% 14.89 ± 59% -88.8% 1.61 ± 37% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
10.13 ± 17% -31.7% 6.92 ± 63% -52.6% 4.80 ± 41% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
40.86 ±110% -46.6% 21.80 ±152% -99.1% 0.35 ±248% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.stop_two_cpus.migrate_swap.task_numa_migrate
6.56 ± 23% -5.6% 6.20 ± 59% -61.9% 2.50 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
18.72 ± 22% -16.2% 15.69 ± 61% -74.3% 4.81 ± 39% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
2.82 ± 43% -22.6% 2.18 ± 73% -83.9% 0.45 ± 59% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
5.03 ± 24% -6.1% 4.72 ± 59% -63.4% 1.84 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
3.16 ± 33% -19.7% 2.54 ± 65% -60.4% 1.25 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.mutex_lock.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
4.13 ± 87% +0.3% 4.15 ± 88% -86.0% 0.58 ±133% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.shmem_inode_acct_blocks.shmem_alloc_and_add_folio.shmem_get_folio_gfp.shmem_write_begin
4.42 ± 44% -21.0% 3.49 ± 65% -71.3% 1.27 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.task_work_run.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
224.55 ± 53% -20.5% 178.59 ± 71% -71.8% 63.25 ± 68% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.do_wait.kernel_wait4.__do_sys_wait4.do_syscall_64
17.95 ± 30% -15.9% 15.10 ± 63% -89.3% 1.91 ± 46% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
17.58 ± 26% -37.5% 10.98 ± 61% -53.8% 8.12 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi.[unknown].[unknown]
27.13 ± 39% -38.5% 16.68 ± 63% -76.3% 6.43 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
29.27 ± 24% -26.9% 21.39 ± 59% -53.2% 13.71 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
3.29 ± 24% -31.7% 2.25 ± 60% -65.3% 1.14 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
4.57 ± 22% -20.1% 3.66 ± 59% -64.4% 1.63 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.[unknown]
1446 ± 25% -3.4% 1396 ± 63% -80.6% 280.50 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
292.35 ±159% -68.1% 93.21 ±217% -99.8% 0.69 ±256% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.stop_two_cpus.migrate_swap.task_numa_migrate
932.87 ± 20% -20.6% 740.44 ± 65% -81.7% 170.42 ± 45% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
1110 ± 24% -11.8% 979.30 ± 62% -81.7% 203.13 ± 43% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
463.55 ± 83% -3.7% 446.18 ± 87% -85.8% 65.73 ± 93% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
1203 ± 20% -19.5% 969.24 ± 62% -80.5% 234.88 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
614.81 ± 41% -27.8% 443.79 ± 79% -79.3% 127.43 ± 46% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.mutex_lock.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
822.39 ± 32% -24.1% 624.54 ± 74% -82.9% 140.70 ± 43% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.task_work_run.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
817.75 ± 28% -6.8% 762.54 ± 79% -85.7% 117.26 ± 58% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
774.10 ± 27% -22.5% 600.11 ± 61% -63.0% 286.19 ± 57% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
2023 ± 16% -18.8% 1643 ± 60% -74.2% 521.59 ± 40% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
1624 ± 25% -12.1% 1428 ± 62% -75.0% 405.54 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
2801 ± 45% -40.4% 1669 ± 81% -54.5% 1273 ± 52% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.[unknown]
55.19 -0.7 54.46 -0.6 54.55 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.read
53.91 -0.6 53.30 -0.8 53.13 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
53.76 -0.6 53.16 -0.8 52.98 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
52.41 -0.5 51.92 -1.1 51.32 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
52.02 -0.5 51.56 -1.1 50.92 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
50.82 -0.4 50.46 -1.2 49.67 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_read_iter.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
50.29 -0.3 49.98 -1.2 49.12 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64
49.61 -0.3 49.36 -1.2 48.42 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter.vfs_read.ksys_read
49.37 -0.2 49.13 -1.2 48.17 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter.vfs_read
24.50 -0.2 24.29 ± 4% -1.1 23.39 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
5.54 ± 2% -0.2 5.34 ± 6% -0.3 5.25 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_read_actor.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
5.49 ± 2% -0.2 5.29 ± 6% -0.3 5.20 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.skb_copy_datagram_iter.unix_stream_read_actor.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
5.40 ± 2% -0.2 5.21 ± 6% -0.3 5.11 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__skb_datagram_iter.skb_copy_datagram_iter.unix_stream_read_actor.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
24.31 -0.2 24.12 ± 4% -1.1 23.20 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
2.86 ± 2% -0.2 2.68 ± 5% -0.2 2.65 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__memcg_slab_free_hook.kmem_cache_free.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
1.60 ± 2% -0.1 1.45 ± 5% -0.0 1.57 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64.read
1.50 ± 2% -0.1 1.36 ± 6% -0.0 1.50 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64.write
0.62 ± 2% -0.1 0.50 ± 38% +0.3 0.95 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.enqueue_task_fair.ttwu_do_activate.try_to_wake_up.autoremove_wake_function.__wake_up_common
2.76 ± 2% -0.1 2.66 ± 6% -0.3 2.45 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.simple_copy_to_iter.__skb_datagram_iter.skb_copy_datagram_iter.unix_stream_read_actor.unix_stream_read_generic
2.65 ± 2% -0.1 2.55 ± 6% -0.3 2.34 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__check_object_size.simple_copy_to_iter.__skb_datagram_iter.skb_copy_datagram_iter.unix_stream_read_actor
0.97 ± 2% -0.1 0.89 ± 5% +0.3 1.26 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
0.78 ± 2% -0.1 0.71 ± 7% +0.4 1.18 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ttwu_do_activate.try_to_wake_up.autoremove_wake_function.__wake_up_common.__wake_up_sync_key
1.24 ± 2% -0.1 1.16 ± 5% +0.1 1.31 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
2.20 ± 2% -0.1 2.14 ± 6% -0.3 1.90 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.check_heap_object.__check_object_size.simple_copy_to_iter.__skb_datagram_iter.skb_copy_datagram_iter
26.13 -0.0 26.09 ± 3% -1.0 25.11 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
0.53 ± 2% -0.0 0.49 ± 38% +0.3 0.79 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dequeue_task_fair.__schedule.schedule.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait
1.03 ± 3% -0.0 1.02 ± 9% +0.1 1.12 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.skb_set_owner_w.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
0.66 ± 2% -0.0 0.65 ± 6% +0.1 0.79 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.write
0.00 +0.0 0.00 +0.6 0.61 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.enqueue_entity.enqueue_task_fair.ttwu_do_activate.try_to_wake_up.autoremove_wake_function
1.83 ± 2% +0.1 1.88 ± 6% +0.8 2.61 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.schedule.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
1.87 ± 2% +0.1 1.93 ± 6% +0.8 2.68 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
1.79 ± 2% +0.1 1.85 ± 6% +0.8 2.56 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__schedule.schedule.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic
2.30 ± 2% +0.1 2.37 ± 6% +1.0 3.30 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
0.40 ± 53% +0.1 0.48 ± 38% +0.4 0.77 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dequeue_entities.dequeue_task_fair.__schedule.schedule.schedule_timeout
0.00 +0.3 0.26 ±100% +0.6 0.61 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.pick_next_task_fair.__schedule.schedule.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait
1.62 ± 3% +0.3 1.93 ± 24% +0.9 2.48 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.try_to_wake_up.autoremove_wake_function.__wake_up_common.__wake_up_sync_key.sock_def_readable
1.63 ± 3% +0.3 1.94 ± 24% +0.9 2.50 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.autoremove_wake_function.__wake_up_common.__wake_up_sync_key.sock_def_readable.unix_stream_sendmsg
1.71 ± 3% +0.3 2.03 ± 23% +0.9 2.61 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__wake_up_common.__wake_up_sync_key.sock_def_readable.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
39.00 +0.5 39.50 +0.1 39.13 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
37.56 +0.6 38.15 +0.1 37.67 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64
1.96 ± 3% +0.7 2.63 ± 24% +1.1 3.08 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__wake_up_sync_key.sock_def_readable.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
3.52 ± 2% +0.7 4.23 ± 15% +1.1 4.62 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_def_readable.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
55.93 -0.8 55.12 -0.7 55.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.read
52.45 -0.5 51.95 -1.1 51.36 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ksys_read
52.06 -0.5 51.60 -1.1 50.96 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_read
50.85 -0.4 50.48 -1.2 49.69 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_read_iter
50.34 -0.3 50.03 -1.2 49.17 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_recvmsg
4.68 ± 2% -0.3 4.38 ± 5% -0.2 4.49 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__memcg_slab_free_hook
49.64 -0.3 49.38 -1.2 48.45 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_recvmsg
49.50 -0.2 49.25 -1.2 48.30 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_read_generic
24.52 -0.2 24.32 ± 4% -1.1 23.41 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.alloc_skb_with_frags
5.57 ± 2% -0.2 5.36 ± 6% -0.3 5.27 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_read_actor
5.52 ± 2% -0.2 5.31 ± 6% -0.3 5.22 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.skb_copy_datagram_iter
24.38 -0.2 24.18 ± 4% -1.1 23.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__alloc_skb
5.43 ± 2% -0.2 5.24 ± 6% -0.3 5.14 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__skb_datagram_iter
95.87 -0.2 95.70 -0.5 95.42 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
3.46 ± 2% -0.2 3.29 ± 6% -0.3 3.16 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__check_object_size
1.77 ± 2% -0.2 1.61 ± 5% -0.0 1.76 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64
1.87 ± 2% -0.2 1.72 ± 5% +0.0 1.87 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.mod_objcg_state
95.57 -0.1 95.43 -0.5 95.11 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64
2.79 ± 2% -0.1 2.68 ± 6% -0.3 2.48 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.simple_copy_to_iter
2.62 ± 2% -0.1 2.53 ± 6% -0.3 2.33 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.check_heap_object
1.69 ± 2% -0.1 1.60 ± 5% +0.4 2.12 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode
0.90 ± 2% -0.1 0.83 ± 5% -0.0 0.90 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSRETQ_unsafe_stack
0.85 ± 2% -0.1 0.78 ± 5% +0.0 0.86 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.obj_cgroup_charge
0.10 ± 4% -0.1 0.04 ±104% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__handle_mm_fault
0.10 ± 4% -0.1 0.04 ±104% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.handle_mm_fault
0.10 ± 4% -0.1 0.04 ±102% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_user_addr_fault
0.10 ± 4% -0.1 0.04 ±102% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.exc_page_fault
0.63 ± 2% -0.1 0.57 ± 5% +0.0 0.64 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__cond_resched
26.17 -0.0 26.13 ± 3% -1.0 25.15 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_alloc_send_pskb
0.10 ± 4% -0.0 0.05 ± 63% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.asm_exc_page_fault
0.32 ± 2% -0.0 0.28 ± 3% +0.0 0.33 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_mm_cid_work
0.32 ± 2% -0.0 0.28 ± 3% +0.0 0.33 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_work_run
0.34 ± 2% -0.0 0.30 ± 5% -0.0 0.34 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_all_qs
0.32 ± 3% -0.0 0.29 ± 6% +0.0 0.33 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__virt_addr_valid
0.32 ± 3% -0.0 0.29 ± 5% +0.0 0.36 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret
0.05 -0.0 0.02 ±129% +0.0 0.07 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.avg_vruntime
0.18 ± 4% -0.0 0.16 ± 7% +0.1 0.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__enqueue_entity
0.47 ± 2% -0.0 0.44 ± 5% +0.0 0.50 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.mutex_lock
0.23 ± 3% -0.0 0.21 ± 6% +0.1 0.33 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.set_next_entity
0.14 ± 4% -0.0 0.12 ± 4% +0.1 0.20 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__dequeue_entity
1.05 ± 3% -0.0 1.04 ± 9% +0.1 1.14 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.skb_set_owner_w
0.28 ± 2% -0.0 0.26 ± 7% +0.1 0.38 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.switch_fpu_return
0.48 ± 2% -0.0 0.47 ± 6% +0.2 0.70 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.enqueue_entity
0.08 ± 3% -0.0 0.07 ± 9% +0.0 0.13 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi
0.24 ± 4% -0.0 0.22 ± 6% +0.1 0.31 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__rseq_handle_notify_resume
0.06 -0.0 0.05 +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuacct_charge
0.29 ± 3% -0.0 0.28 ± 7% +0.1 0.40 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.switch_mm_irqs_off
0.16 ± 2% -0.0 0.15 ± 4% +0.0 0.18 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare
0.12 ± 3% -0.0 0.12 ± 6% +0.1 0.18 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock_task
0.18 ± 3% -0.0 0.17 ± 6% +0.1 0.24 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.restore_fpregs_from_fpstate
0.18 ± 4% -0.0 0.17 ± 6% +0.1 0.23 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rseq_ip_fixup
0.05 ± 6% -0.0 0.04 ± 37% +0.0 0.07 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rseq_update_cpu_node_id
0.05 -0.0 0.04 ± 37% +0.0 0.06 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_clock
0.07 ± 7% -0.0 0.06 ± 9% +0.0 0.09 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.os_xsave
0.13 ± 6% -0.0 0.12 ± 6% +0.0 0.17 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rseq_get_rseq_cs
0.12 ± 6% -0.0 0.12 ± 7% +0.0 0.16 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__get_user_8
0.14 ± 3% -0.0 0.13 ± 7% +0.1 0.20 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.wakeup_preempt
0.09 ± 5% -0.0 0.09 ± 5% +0.0 0.11 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cgroup_rstat_updated
0.14 ± 3% -0.0 0.13 ± 4% +0.0 0.18 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_se
0.18 ± 2% -0.0 0.17 ± 2% -0.0 0.14 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.put_cpu_partial
0.13 ± 3% -0.0 0.13 ± 7% +0.0 0.16 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pick_eevdf
0.07 ± 4% -0.0 0.07 ± 7% +0.0 0.10 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.check_preempt_wakeup_fair
0.08 ± 5% -0.0 0.08 ± 8% +0.0 0.13 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_curr_se
0.06 ± 5% -0.0 0.06 ± 5% +0.0 0.07 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_clock_cpu
0.07 +0.0 0.07 ± 7% +0.0 0.11 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.put_prev_entity
0.00 +0.0 0.00 +0.1 0.05 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__put_user_8
0.06 ± 10% +0.0 0.06 ± 21% +0.4 0.43 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_any_partial
0.22 ± 3% +0.0 0.22 ± 7% +0.1 0.31 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_cfs_group
0.06 ± 6% +0.0 0.06 ± 10% +0.0 0.09 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.___perf_sw_event
0.12 ± 2% +0.0 0.12 ± 7% +0.1 0.17 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.wake_affine
0.07 +0.0 0.07 ± 11% +0.0 0.10 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_min_vruntime
0.10 ± 4% +0.0 0.11 ± 7% +0.0 0.15 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_cfs_rq
0.05 ± 35% +0.0 0.06 ± 5% +0.0 0.08 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_tp_event
0.09 ± 35% +0.0 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.14 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_trace_sched_wakeup_template
0.05 ± 36% +0.0 0.05 ± 6% +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.place_entity
0.07 ± 4% +0.0 0.08 ± 9% +0.0 0.10 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_h_load
0.00 +0.0 0.01 ±264% +0.1 0.06 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.native_irq_return_iret
0.12 ± 4% +0.0 0.12 ± 8% +0.1 0.17 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__switch_to
0.12 ± 3% +0.0 0.13 ± 6% +0.0 0.16 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__switch_to_asm
0.75 ± 2% +0.0 0.76 ± 7% +0.3 1.08 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.enqueue_task_fair
0.16 ± 5% +0.0 0.17 ± 7% +0.0 0.20 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_tick_fair
0.47 ± 2% +0.0 0.49 ± 6% +0.2 0.64 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_load_avg
0.64 ± 2% +0.0 0.65 ± 6% +0.3 0.90 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dequeue_task_fair
0.76 ± 2% +0.0 0.78 ± 4% +0.2 0.98 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pick_next_task_fair
0.22 ± 3% +0.0 0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.28 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pick_task_fair
0.12 ± 4% +0.0 0.13 ± 14% +0.1 0.17 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.reweight_entity
0.20 ± 3% +0.0 0.22 ± 6% +0.0 0.24 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_tick
0.88 ± 2% +0.0 0.90 ± 7% +0.4 1.29 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ttwu_do_activate
0.30 ± 4% +0.0 0.32 ± 7% +0.1 0.38 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_handler
0.35 ± 2% +0.0 0.37 ± 5% +0.1 0.49 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dequeue_entity
0.31 ± 4% +0.0 0.33 ± 6% +0.1 0.38 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__hrtimer_run_queues
0.29 ± 4% +0.0 0.31 ± 6% +0.1 0.36 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_process_times
0.13 ± 2% +0.0 0.15 ± 11% +0.1 0.19 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.finish_task_switch
0.18 ± 2% +0.0 0.21 ± 8% +0.1 0.26 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.prepare_task_switch
0.35 ± 3% +0.0 0.37 ± 5% +0.1 0.43 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.hrtimer_interrupt
0.35 ± 3% +0.0 0.37 ± 6% +0.1 0.44 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
0.63 ± 2% +0.0 0.65 ± 7% +0.3 0.89 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dequeue_entities
0.09 ± 8% +0.0 0.12 ± 7% +0.0 0.11 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.generic_perform_write
2.21 ± 2% +0.0 2.23 ± 6% +0.8 3.04 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.schedule_timeout
0.07 ± 10% +0.0 0.10 ± 11% +0.0 0.08 ± 20% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_balance_find_src_group
0.06 ± 10% +0.0 0.09 ± 11% +0.0 0.06 ± 40% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_sg_lb_stats
0.07 ± 10% +0.0 0.10 ± 11% +0.0 0.07 ± 19% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_sd_lb_stats
0.10 ± 3% +0.0 0.13 ± 14% +0.0 0.13 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock
0.01 ±282% +0.0 0.04 ± 57% +0.1 0.06 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.native_sched_clock
0.43 ± 3% +0.0 0.47 ± 7% +0.2 0.64 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_curr
0.13 ± 8% +0.0 0.16 ± 8% +0.0 0.16 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.writen
0.39 ± 3% +0.0 0.42 ± 6% +0.1 0.48 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
0.42 ± 3% +0.0 0.46 ± 6% +0.1 0.52 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
0.02 ±111% +0.0 0.06 ± 13% +0.0 0.04 ± 38% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.set_task_cpu
0.02 ±141% +0.0 0.06 ± 11% +0.0 0.06 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ring_buffer_read_head
2.45 ± 2% +0.0 2.50 ± 6% +1.0 3.43 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.schedule
0.00 +0.1 0.06 ± 8% +0.0 0.03 ± 77% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vruntime_eligible
0.22 ± 8% +0.1 0.28 ± 9% +0.1 0.27 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_mmap__push
0.23 ± 8% +0.1 0.29 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.record__mmap_read_evlist
0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.29 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cmd_record
0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.30 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.handle_internal_command
0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.30 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.main
0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.30 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.run_builtin
2.31 ± 2% +0.1 2.38 ± 7% +1.0 3.32 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_data_wait
0.18 ± 38% +0.1 0.26 ± 17% +0.2 0.41 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ordered_events__queue
0.18 ± 38% +0.1 0.26 ± 17% +0.2 0.41 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.queue_event
0.19 ± 37% +0.1 0.26 ± 16% +0.2 0.41 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.process_simple
0.00 +0.1 0.07 ± 19% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.schedule_idle
0.19 ± 37% +0.1 0.29 ± 17% +0.2 0.42 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_session__process_events
0.19 ± 37% +0.1 0.29 ± 17% +0.2 0.42 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.reader__read_event
0.19 ± 37% +0.1 0.29 ± 17% +0.2 0.42 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.record__finish_output
2.45 ± 2% +0.1 2.56 ± 6% +1.0 3.43 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__schedule
0.00 +0.1 0.12 ± 19% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.flush_smp_call_function_queue
0.42 ± 18% +0.1 0.54 ± 23% +0.3 0.70 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__cmd_record
0.00 +0.1 0.14 ± 20% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_ttwu_pending
0.00 +0.2 0.15 ± 17% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.intel_idle
0.00 +0.2 0.17 ± 18% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__flush_smp_call_function_queue
0.01 ±282% +0.2 0.18 ± 70% +0.1 0.06 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.available_idle_cpu
0.23 ± 3% +0.2 0.43 ± 16% +0.1 0.31 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.prepare_to_wait
0.00 +0.2 0.20 ± 18% +0.0 0.03 ±104% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter
0.00 +0.2 0.20 ± 18% +0.0 0.03 ±104% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state
0.01 ±282% +0.2 0.22 ± 16% +0.0 0.04 ± 81% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_idle_call
3.50 ± 2% +0.2 3.73 ± 8% +0.4 3.87 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock
1.81 ± 3% +0.3 2.12 ± 22% +0.9 2.68 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.autoremove_wake_function
1.80 ± 3% +0.3 2.12 ± 22% +0.9 2.66 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.try_to_wake_up
1.89 ± 3% +0.3 2.22 ± 21% +0.9 2.80 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__wake_up_common
0.00 +0.3 0.35 ±110% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.select_idle_cpu
0.06 ± 6% +0.4 0.41 ± 95% +0.0 0.09 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.select_idle_sibling
0.22 ± 2% +0.4 0.57 ± 70% +0.1 0.31 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.select_task_rq_fair
0.26 ± 5% +0.4 0.62 ± 65% +0.1 0.38 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.select_task_rq
0.04 ± 77% +0.4 0.43 ± 18% +0.1 0.10 ± 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.start_secondary
0.04 ± 77% +0.4 0.43 ± 18% +0.1 0.10 ± 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_idle
0.04 ± 77% +0.4 0.43 ± 17% +0.1 0.10 ± 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.common_startup_64
0.04 ± 77% +0.4 0.43 ± 17% +0.1 0.10 ± 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry
40.28 +0.4 40.71 +0.2 40.46 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_write
39.04 +0.5 39.54 +0.1 39.18 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_write_iter
37.73 +0.6 38.31 +0.1 37.84 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_sendmsg
2.15 ± 3% +0.7 2.82 ± 23% +1.1 3.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__wake_up_sync_key
3.55 ± 2% +0.7 4.25 ± 15% +1.1 4.65 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_def_readable
2.90 ± 2% -0.2 2.74 ± 5% -0.2 2.69 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__memcg_slab_free_hook
1.50 ± 2% -0.1 1.37 ± 5% +0.0 1.51 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.mod_objcg_state
1.41 ± 2% -0.1 1.30 ± 5% -0.2 1.20 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.kmem_cache_free
0.83 ± 3% -0.1 0.74 ± 5% -0.0 0.81 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.read
0.88 ± 2% -0.1 0.80 ± 5% -0.0 0.88 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.entry_SYSRETQ_unsafe_stack
0.74 ± 2% -0.1 0.67 ± 5% +0.0 0.75 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.write
0.70 ± 2% -0.1 0.64 ± 6% +0.0 0.73 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.vfs_read
0.67 ± 2% -0.1 0.61 ± 5% +0.0 0.68 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.vfs_write
2.19 ± 2% -0.1 2.13 ± 6% -0.3 1.88 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.check_heap_object
0.67 ± 2% -0.1 0.62 ± 4% -0.0 0.65 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof
0.52 ± 3% -0.1 0.47 ± 4% -0.0 0.52 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.obj_cgroup_charge
0.51 ± 2% -0.0 0.46 ± 5% -0.0 0.51 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof
0.29 ± 2% -0.0 0.25 ± 3% +0.0 0.31 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.task_mm_cid_work
0.43 ± 2% -0.0 0.40 ± 4% +0.0 0.44 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64
0.34 ± 3% -0.0 0.31 ± 6% +0.0 0.35 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__skb_datagram_iter
0.29 ± 2% -0.0 0.26 ± 6% +0.0 0.30 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__virt_addr_valid
0.33 ± 2% -0.0 0.30 ± 6% +0.0 0.33 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__cond_resched
0.28 ± 3% -0.0 0.25 ± 5% +0.0 0.31 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret
0.37 ± 2% -0.0 0.34 ± 6% -0.0 0.36 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__check_object_size
0.18 ± 5% -0.0 0.15 ± 6% +0.1 0.27 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__enqueue_entity
0.70 -0.0 0.67 ± 2% -0.1 0.60 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_partial_node
0.21 ± 3% -0.0 0.18 ± 6% -0.0 0.21 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_all_qs
0.22 ± 3% -0.0 0.20 ± 6% -0.0 0.22 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.x64_sys_call
0.34 ± 2% -0.0 0.32 ± 5% +0.0 0.37 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode
1.75 ± 2% -0.0 1.72 ± 5% -0.1 1.63 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__alloc_skb
0.95 -0.0 0.93 -0.1 0.87 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.___slab_alloc
0.42 ± 2% -0.0 0.40 ± 7% +0.0 0.45 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.skb_release_data
0.19 ± 2% -0.0 0.17 ± 6% -0.0 0.18 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rw_verify_area
1.03 ± 3% -0.0 1.02 ± 9% +0.1 1.12 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.skb_set_owner_w
0.03 ± 89% -0.0 0.01 ±173% +0.0 0.06 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.avg_vruntime
0.06 ± 5% -0.0 0.04 ± 37% +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.cpuacct_charge
0.32 ± 2% -0.0 0.30 ± 5% +0.0 0.34 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.mutex_lock
0.11 ± 4% -0.0 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.15 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__dequeue_entity
0.06 ± 8% -0.0 0.05 ± 38% +0.0 0.08 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.prepare_to_wait
0.18 ± 3% -0.0 0.17 ± 7% +0.1 0.24 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.restore_fpregs_from_fpstate
0.11 ± 4% -0.0 0.10 ± 6% +0.1 0.17 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock_task
0.29 ± 3% -0.0 0.28 ± 7% +0.1 0.40 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.switch_mm_irqs_off
0.12 ± 3% -0.0 0.11 ± 7% +0.0 0.15 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__get_user_8
0.05 -0.0 0.04 ± 37% +0.0 0.07 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rseq_update_cpu_node_id
0.01 ±282% -0.0 0.00 +0.1 0.06 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.place_entity
0.09 ± 3% -0.0 0.08 ± 8% +0.0 0.13 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.unix_stream_data_wait
0.22 ± 3% -0.0 0.22 ± 7% +0.1 0.31 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_cfs_group
0.05 ± 8% -0.0 0.05 ± 40% +0.0 0.07 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.dequeue_entities
0.10 ± 5% -0.0 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.15 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.switch_fpu_return
0.05 -0.0 0.05 ± 38% +0.0 0.06 ± 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.___perf_sw_event
0.05 -0.0 0.05 ± 38% +0.0 0.07 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.enqueue_task_fair
0.13 ± 3% -0.0 0.12 ± 5% +0.0 0.17 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_se
0.10 ± 3% -0.0 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.14 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.try_to_wake_up
0.17 -0.0 0.17 -0.0 0.13 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.put_cpu_partial
0.06 ± 7% -0.0 0.06 ± 9% +0.0 0.09 ± 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.os_xsave
0.32 -0.0 0.32 ± 2% -0.0 0.28 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__put_partials
0.08 ± 3% -0.0 0.08 ± 6% +0.0 0.12 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_curr_se
0.09 ± 5% -0.0 0.09 ± 7% +0.0 0.14 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.schedule_timeout
0.11 ± 4% -0.0 0.11 ± 6% +0.0 0.13 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.pick_eevdf
0.06 ± 5% -0.0 0.06 ± 5% +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.dequeue_entity
0.06 -0.0 0.06 ± 8% +0.0 0.08 ± 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.pick_task_fair
0.00 +0.0 0.00 +0.1 0.05 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.select_task_rq_fair
0.00 +0.0 0.00 +0.1 0.06 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.reweight_entity
0.09 ± 3% +0.0 0.09 ± 5% +0.0 0.13 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.finish_task_switch
0.07 ± 7% +0.0 0.07 ± 8% +0.0 0.10 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_min_vruntime
0.23 ± 2% +0.0 0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.30 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_load_avg
0.07 ± 9% +0.0 0.07 ± 9% +0.0 0.10 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.task_h_load
0.10 ± 3% +0.0 0.10 ± 6% +0.0 0.14 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_cfs_rq
0.04 ± 53% +0.0 0.04 ± 38% +0.0 0.07 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.select_task_rq
0.00 +0.0 0.01 ±264% +0.1 0.06 ± 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.native_irq_return_iret
0.12 ± 2% +0.0 0.13 ± 6% +0.0 0.16 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__switch_to_asm
0.01 ±187% +0.0 0.02 ±129% +0.0 0.06 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.perf_tp_event
0.11 ± 3% +0.0 0.12 ± 8% +0.0 0.16 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__switch_to
0.08 ± 5% +0.0 0.09 ± 7% +0.0 0.12 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__wake_up_common
0.24 ± 2% +0.0 0.26 ± 7% +0.1 0.35 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__schedule
0.12 ± 5% +0.0 0.14 ± 11% +0.1 0.18 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_curr
0.00 +0.0 0.02 ±129% +0.1 0.05 ± 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.native_sched_clock
0.13 ± 3% +0.0 0.15 ± 7% +0.1 0.18 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.prepare_task_switch
0.05 +0.0 0.08 ± 23% +0.0 0.06 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock
0.00 +0.0 0.04 ± 38% +0.1 0.05 ± 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.enqueue_entity
0.00 +0.1 0.06 ± 11% +0.0 0.05 ± 38% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ring_buffer_read_head
0.18 ± 37% +0.1 0.25 ± 17% +0.2 0.40 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.queue_event
0.00 +0.2 0.15 ± 17% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.intel_idle
0.01 ±282% +0.2 0.18 ± 70% +0.0 0.05 ± 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.available_idle_cpu
Hi Oliver,
On 2024/9/29 21:51, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Chenyu and Honglei,
>
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:28:30PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
>> Hi Honglei,
>>
>> On 2024-09-27 at 21:38:53 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Yu,
>>>
>>> Yep, I understand the preemption should happen in the same cfs level. Just
>>> not sure the purpose of the 'nr_running check' stuff. Perhaps its role is
>>> just to judge whether it’s necessary to do the preemption check. If there is
>>> at least one more ready (cfs) task in the rq and current is not eligible, we
>>> take care of the waiting tasks. Thoughts?
>>
>> I got your point and it makes sense. Whether the preemption check should be triggered
>> seems to be a heuristic trade-off to me. I'm ok with using more aggressive preemption
>> strategy as it depends on whether that workload prefers latency or throughput, and as
>> long as it did not introduce regression :-)
>>
>> Oliver, may I know if you happen to have time for a test if the following change
>> suggested by Honglei would make the regression go away? Thanks.
>
> I applied the patch directly upon 85e511df3cec, the test found it can reduce the
> regression but not totally reovered
>
> =========================================================================================
> compiler/cpufreq_governor/ipc/iterations/kconfig/mode/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/testcase:
> gcc-12/performance/socket/4/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/50%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-spr-r02/hackbench
>
> commit:
> 82e9d0456e06 ("sched/fair: Avoid re-setting virtual deadline on 'migrations'")
> 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> 8079496d311b <--- patch from Honglei
>
> 82e9d0456e06cebe 85e511df3cec46021024176672a 8079496d311b6b0d4dae973f4df
> ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
> \ | \ | \
> 623219 -13.1% 541887 -3.2% 603080 hackbench.throughput
>
Thanks a lot for running the test. The result is as expectation, as the
strategy of short slices tends to favor more frequent scheduling to help
delay-sensitive tasks acquire CPU as early as possible.
I suspect that the current test environment does not have any special
configurations for slices. In this case, a 3.2% regression is still
somewhat significant. As Yu mentioned, this is a heuristic adjustment.
In this particular case, it seems that Yu's patch is more effective in
solving the problem. Let's delegate the preemption opportunity to the
higher-level update_curr() function.
Thanks,
Honglei
>>
>> thanks,
>> Chenyu
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index fd2f3831c74e..290e5fdfc267 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>>
>> account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
>>
>> - if (rq->nr_running == 1)
>> + if (rq->cfs.nr_running == 1)
>> return;
>>
>> if (resched || did_preempt_short(cfs_rq, curr)) {
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>
>
> below is full comparison FYI.
>
>
> =========================================================================================
> compiler/cpufreq_governor/ipc/iterations/kconfig/mode/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/testcase:
> gcc-12/performance/socket/4/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/50%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-spr-r02/hackbench
>
> commit:
> 82e9d0456e06 ("sched/fair: Avoid re-setting virtual deadline on 'migrations'")
> 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> 8079496d311b <--- patch from Honglei
>
> 82e9d0456e06cebe 85e511df3cec46021024176672a 8079496d311b6b0d4dae973f4df
> ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
> \ | \ | \
> 150791 ± 3% -3.9% 144868 ± 2% -8.4% 138189 ± 3% perf-c2c.HITM.local
> 217.40 +13.5% 246.74 +1.9% 221.55 uptime.boot
> 4679401 -15.8% 3938145 +35.5% 6342833 vmstat.system.cs
> 854648 -15.2% 724774 +35.0% 1153448 vmstat.system.in
> 0.46 ± 2% -0.1 0.40 +0.1 0.51 ± 2% mpstat.cpu.all.irq%
> 0.03 ± 3% -0.0 0.03 +0.0 0.04 mpstat.cpu.all.soft%
> 3.35 -0.6 2.75 +0.3 3.65 mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
> 922628 ± 16% +17.2% 1080933 ± 14% +87.9% 1733278 ± 14% numa-numastat.node0.local_node
> 1027104 ± 13% +17.6% 1207529 ± 15% +82.3% 1872582 ± 14% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
> 2553206 ± 16% +0.4% 2563309 ± 10% +46.3% 3735450 ± 4% numa-numastat.node1.local_node
> 2684151 ± 16% -0.4% 2672834 ± 8% +43.2% 3843864 ± 5% numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit
> 174.58 +16.3% 203.09 +2.1% 178.28 time.elapsed_time
> 174.58 +16.3% 203.09 +2.1% 178.28 time.elapsed_time.max
> 1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 +50.7% 2.492e+08 time.involuntary_context_switches
> 36869 +17.6% 43340 +1.6% 37461 time.system_time
> 1172 -5.5% 1107 +8.9% 1276 time.user_time
> 6.478e+08 -3.5% 6.255e+08 +36.2% 8.824e+08 ± 2% time.voluntary_context_switches
> 8177075 ± 14% +8.6% 8880848 ± 13% +47.8% 12086160 ± 2% meminfo.Cached
> 7771720 ± 15% +9.5% 8506289 ± 13% +50.8% 11720513 ± 2% meminfo.Committed_AS
> 4992416 ± 31% +17.9% 5883734 ± 19% +83.6% 9165655 ± 2% meminfo.Inactive
> 4992203 ± 31% +17.9% 5883521 ± 19% +83.6% 9165427 ± 2% meminfo.Inactive(anon)
> 2281337 ± 19% +17.2% 2673418 ± 4% +38.0% 3147813 ± 3% meminfo.Mapped
> 12824178 ± 10% +5.9% 13577581 ± 8% +30.4% 16717964 meminfo.Memused
> 5084291 ± 22% +13.8% 5788029 ± 20% +76.9% 8993338 ± 2% meminfo.Shmem
> 13135346 ± 9% +5.2% 13824666 ± 8% +29.2% 16968485 meminfo.max_used_kB
> 3089827 ± 31% +15.4% 3565461 ± 7% +49.8% 4628448 ± 10% numa-meminfo.node0.FilePages
> 5391461 ± 19% +16.5% 6281524 ± 6% +31.1% 7067023 ± 10% numa-meminfo.node0.MemUsed
> 352581 ± 13% +24.6% 439472 ± 16% +11.3% 392488 ± 14% numa-meminfo.node0.SUnreclaim
> 5090008 ± 22% +4.5% 5317103 ± 18% +46.6% 7462041 ± 3% numa-meminfo.node1.FilePages
> 4237429 ± 32% +13.8% 4822257 ± 21% +66.3% 7045772 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive
> 4237311 ± 32% +13.8% 4822122 ± 21% +66.3% 7045629 ± 7% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive(anon)
> 1875959 ± 20% +18.1% 2215441 ± 5% +44.6% 2711735 ± 3% numa-meminfo.node1.Mapped
> 7434746 ± 16% -1.8% 7298189 ± 12% +29.9% 9655790 ± 5% numa-meminfo.node1.MemUsed
> 4692017 ± 22% +10.5% 5186768 ± 18% +55.8% 7310040 ± 4% numa-meminfo.node1.Shmem
> 623219 -13.1% 541887 -3.2% 603080 hackbench.throughput
> 606251 -14.1% 520789 -2.1% 593622 hackbench.throughput_avg
> 623219 -13.1% 541887 -3.2% 603080 hackbench.throughput_best
> 580034 -14.8% 494354 +0.4% 582377 hackbench.throughput_worst
> 174.58 +16.3% 203.09 +2.1% 178.28 hackbench.time.elapsed_time
> 174.58 +16.3% 203.09 +2.1% 178.28 hackbench.time.elapsed_time.max
> 1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 +50.7% 2.492e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> 36869 +17.6% 43340 +1.6% 37461 hackbench.time.system_time
> 1172 -5.5% 1107 +8.9% 1276 hackbench.time.user_time
> 6.478e+08 -3.5% 6.255e+08 +36.2% 8.824e+08 ± 2% hackbench.time.voluntary_context_switches
> 772255 ± 31% +15.4% 891384 ± 7% +49.8% 1156899 ± 10% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_file_pages
> 1025412 ± 13% +17.7% 1206842 ± 15% +82.6% 1871921 ± 14% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
> 920942 ± 16% +17.3% 1080247 ± 14% +88.1% 1732619 ± 14% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_local
> 1271682 ± 22% +4.5% 1328902 ± 18% +46.6% 1863679 ± 3% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_file_pages
> 1059760 ± 32% +13.7% 1205295 ± 21% +66.1% 1759754 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_inactive_anon
> 469078 ± 20% +18.0% 553505 ± 5% +44.2% 676623 ± 3% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_mapped
> 1172184 ± 22% +10.6% 1296319 ± 18% +55.8% 1825678 ± 4% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_shmem
> 1059759 ± 32% +13.7% 1205294 ± 21% +66.1% 1759752 ± 7% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_inactive_anon
> 2682254 ± 16% -0.4% 2671316 ± 8% +43.3% 3842866 ± 5% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_hit
> 2551311 ± 16% +0.4% 2561794 ± 10% +46.4% 3734454 ± 4% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_local
> 6233000 -0.3% 6214123 -1.6% 6135664 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty_background_threshold
> 12481241 -0.3% 12443440 -1.6% 12286330 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty_threshold
> 2044616 ± 14% +8.6% 2220456 ± 13% +47.8% 3022899 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages
> 62706078 -0.3% 62517035 -1.6% 61731279 proc-vmstat.nr_free_pages
> 1247557 ± 31% +17.9% 1471046 ± 19% +83.8% 2292396 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_anon
> 570709 ± 19% +17.2% 668608 ± 4% +38.0% 787666 ± 3% proc-vmstat.nr_mapped
> 1271419 ± 23% +13.8% 1447250 ± 20% +76.9% 2249692 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
> 44542 +2.7% 45755 +5.1% 46796 proc-vmstat.nr_slab_reclaimable
> 188881 -0.7% 187493 +1.4% 191440 proc-vmstat.nr_slab_unreclaimable
> 1247557 ± 31% +17.9% 1471046 ± 19% +83.8% 2292396 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_anon
> 3714588 ± 9% +6.5% 3954189 ± 12% +54.0% 5719994 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
> 3479163 ± 10% +4.8% 3645729 ± 9% +57.3% 5472276 proc-vmstat.numa_local
> 642130 ± 68% -71.2% 184909 ± 11% -73.9% 167609 ± 14% proc-vmstat.pgactivate
> 4593887 ± 7% +1.2% 4650141 ± 7% +131.4% 10629624 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
> 2170433 ± 2% +6.8% 2318318 ± 2% +6.4% 2308275 ± 5% proc-vmstat.pgfault
> 2631626 ± 7% -8.8% 2400780 +177.3% 7298788 proc-vmstat.pgfree
> 138302 ± 4% +6.7% 147631 ± 3% -0.7% 137382 ± 4% proc-vmstat.pgreuse
> 0.30 ± 3% -4.9% 0.28 ± 2% +20.7% 0.36 perf-stat.i.MPKI
> 6.354e+10 -11.4% 5.63e+10 +2.2% 6.497e+10 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
> 0.53 -0.0 0.52 +0.0 0.57 perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
> 3.226e+08 -12.5% 2.822e+08 +9.2% 3.523e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
> 3.91 ± 3% -0.2 3.74 ± 2% +0.9 4.80 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
> 94557935 ± 3% -15.2% 80197744 ± 2% +25.1% 1.183e+08 perf-stat.i.cache-misses
> 2.563e+09 -13.7% 2.212e+09 +1.3% 2.596e+09 perf-stat.i.cache-references
> 4710895 -15.9% 3959720 +36.7% 6439647 perf-stat.i.context-switches
> 1.86 +14.3% 2.13 -0.8% 1.85 perf-stat.i.cpi
> 224291 +0.0% 224353 +1.4% 227521 perf-stat.i.cpu-clock
> 6.345e+11 +0.4% 6.368e+11 +1.3% 6.424e+11 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
> 601598 -15.0% 511540 +13.7% 683759 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations
> 7390 ± 5% +28.4% 9492 ± 2% -23.5% 5655 perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
> 3.408e+11 -12.1% 2.997e+11 +2.1% 3.478e+11 perf-stat.i.instructions
> 0.54 -12.2% 0.47 +0.8% 0.55 perf-stat.i.ipc
> 23.73 -15.9% 19.95 +32.3% 31.39 perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
> 224291 +0.0% 224353 +1.4% 227521 perf-stat.i.task-clock
> 0.25 ± 35% +8.1% 0.27 ± 2% +38.0% 0.34 perf-stat.overall.MPKI
> 0.45 ± 35% +0.1 0.50 +0.1 0.54 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
> 3.26 ± 35% +0.3 3.60 +1.3 4.54 perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
> 1.66 ± 35% +28.5% 2.13 +11.6% 1.85 perf-stat.overall.cpi
> 6006 ± 35% +33.5% 8020 ± 2% -9.1% 5458 perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
> 0.48 ± 35% -1.5% 0.47 +13.4% 0.54 perf-stat.overall.ipc
> 2.847e+08 ± 35% -1.6% 2.802e+08 +21.1% 3.448e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
> 83193631 ± 35% -5.0% 79040711 ± 2% +38.7% 1.154e+08 perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
> 4153465 ± 35% -5.4% 3930147 +52.2% 6323104 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
> 531469 ± 35% -4.7% 506531 +26.2% 670740 ± 2% perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations
> 5.287e+13 ± 35% +15.1% 6.083e+13 +15.6% 6.114e+13 perf-stat.total.instructions
> 13829361 +51.8% 20989754 +6.0% 14655040 ± 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.avg
> 18756074 ± 5% +44.2% 27055241 ± 3% +3.8% 19470555 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.max
> 12499623 ± 2% +52.4% 19043277 ± 2% +8.0% 13493604 ± 14% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.min
> 8.93 ± 2% +14.1% 10.19 -5.2% 8.47 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.h_nr_running.avg
> 4.68 ± 3% +10.0% 5.15 ± 2% -1.5% 4.62 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.h_nr_running.stddev
> 0.44 ± 35% +75.8% 0.78 ± 19% -1.6% 0.44 ± 50% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.min
> 13829361 +51.8% 20989754 +6.0% 14655040 ± 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.avg
> 18756074 ± 5% +44.2% 27055241 ± 3% +3.8% 19470555 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max
> 12499623 ± 2% +52.4% 19043277 ± 2% +8.0% 13493604 ± 14% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.min
> 0.68 +11.7% 0.76 -1.3% 0.67 ± 2% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_running.avg
> 176.30 ± 3% -22.8% 136.16 ± 4% -2.9% 171.17 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_avg.max
> 176.30 ± 3% -22.8% 136.16 ± 4% -2.9% 171.17 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.util_avg.max
> 8995 +16.0% 10437 -5.7% 8484 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.avg
> 18978 ± 6% +13.7% 21579 ± 6% -10.1% 17066 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.max
> 2890 ± 4% +13.9% 3292 ± 3% -1.5% 2848 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_avg.stddev
> 1094 ± 3% +2.9% 1125 ± 3% +72.4% 1886 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est.avg
> 4561 ± 14% +19.8% 5464 ± 19% +50.2% 6850 ± 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est.max
> 816.44 ± 6% +7.4% 877.16 ± 4% +78.4% 1456 ± 4% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est.stddev
> 415209 ± 22% -23.3% 318311 ± 3% -8.8% 378602 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.avg
> 102333 ± 2% +30.5% 133496 ± 2% +4.0% 106415 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu.clock.avg
> 102519 ± 2% +30.4% 133722 ± 2% +4.0% 106590 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.clock.max
> 102127 ± 2% +30.5% 133254 ± 2% +4.0% 106199 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu.clock.min
> 101839 ± 2% +30.5% 132880 ± 2% +4.0% 105862 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.avg
> 102169 ± 2% +30.4% 133268 ± 2% +3.9% 106186 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.max
> 87129 ± 2% +35.6% 118117 ± 2% +4.6% 91152 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.min
> 11573 +32.4% 15327 -0.3% 11534 sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.avg
> 14704 +23.9% 18214 +3.2% 15178 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.max
> 1516 ± 9% +16.4% 1765 ± 10% +33.3% 2021 ± 44% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.stddev
> 8.92 ± 2% +14.1% 10.18 -5.2% 8.46 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.avg
> 4.69 ± 2% +10.0% 5.16 ± 2% -1.7% 4.61 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.stddev
> 1232815 ± 2% +27.3% 1569099 +45.1% 1789014 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
> 1411362 ± 5% +26.8% 1789325 ± 3% +48.6% 2097828 ± 20% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.max
> 1045767 ± 2% +27.3% 1331341 ± 3% +42.5% 1489877 ± 17% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min
> 102127 ± 2% +30.5% 133250 ± 2% +4.0% 106198 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu_clk
> 101071 ± 2% +30.8% 132194 ± 2% +4.0% 105143 ± 9% sched_debug.ktime
> 0.00 -25.0% 0.00 -3.1% 0.00 ± 8% sched_debug.rt_rq:.rt_nr_running.avg
> 0.33 -25.0% 0.25 -3.1% 0.32 ± 8% sched_debug.rt_rq:.rt_nr_running.max
> 0.02 -25.0% 0.02 -3.1% 0.02 ± 8% sched_debug.rt_rq:.rt_nr_running.stddev
> 102997 ± 2% +30.2% 134142 ± 2% +4.0% 107069 ± 9% sched_debug.sched_clk
> 16347631 +100.0% 32695263 +100.0% 32695263 sched_debug.sysctl_sched.sysctl_sched_features
> 3.31 ±123% -42.6% 1.90 ± 86% -89.1% 0.36 ± 88% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__alloc_pages_noprof.alloc_pages_mpol_noprof.folio_alloc_mpol_noprof.shmem_alloc_folio
> 8.46 ± 38% +100.8% 16.98 ± 82% -85.1% 1.26 ±134% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof
> 5.72 ± 38% +21.2% 6.93 ± 80% -85.6% 0.83 ± 85% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.allocate_slab.___slab_alloc
> 7.88 ± 21% +11.3% 8.77 ± 59% -89.0% 0.87 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
> 7.16 ± 36% -24.4% 5.42 ± 73% -70.7% 2.10 ± 66% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
> 28.76 ±142% -62.8% 10.70 ±198% -99.4% 0.18 ±233% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.stop_two_cpus.migrate_swap.task_numa_migrate
> 3.75 ± 24% +0.6% 3.77 ± 59% -62.1% 1.42 ± 39% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
> 10.26 ± 19% -9.5% 9.29 ± 62% -74.3% 2.64 ± 40% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 2.82 ± 43% -22.6% 2.18 ± 73% -83.9% 0.45 ± 59% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
> 2.30 ± 29% -4.8% 2.19 ± 61% -72.3% 0.64 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
> 1.75 ± 49% -5.1% 1.66 ± 65% -61.1% 0.68 ± 39% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.mutex_lock.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
> 4.13 ± 87% +0.3% 4.15 ± 88% -86.0% 0.58 ±133% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.shmem_inode_acct_blocks.shmem_alloc_and_add_folio.shmem_get_folio_gfp.shmem_write_begin
> 2.81 ± 59% -20.7% 2.23 ± 61% -72.8% 0.76 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.task_work_run.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> 9.13 ± 30% +0.5% 9.17 ± 67% -87.4% 1.15 ± 53% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
> 9.94 ± 32% -38.3% 6.13 ± 62% -56.9% 4.28 ± 37% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi.[unknown].[unknown]
> 11.06 ± 57% -45.0% 6.08 ± 75% -90.4% 1.06 ± 60% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
> 16.36 ± 24% -23.9% 12.45 ± 59% -53.7% 7.57 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
> 1.77 ± 23% -28.5% 1.26 ± 60% -66.1% 0.60 ± 38% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 2.66 ± 21% -15.5% 2.25 ± 58% -63.8% 0.96 ± 37% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.[unknown]
> 226.74 ±108% -40.0% 136.06 ±120% -95.1% 11.09 ± 91% perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.worker_thread.kthread.ret_from_fork.ret_from_fork_asm
> 1412 ± 25% -7.0% 1313 ± 66% -83.6% 231.23 ± 47% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
> 1221 ± 4% -23.0% 940.87 ± 58% -51.1% 596.88 ± 89% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
> 262.66 ±176% -72.1% 73.22 ±239% -99.9% 0.35 ±248% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.stop_two_cpus.migrate_swap.task_numa_migrate
> 779.32 ± 29% -15.9% 655.34 ± 72% -80.4% 152.55 ± 45% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
> 1042 ± 23% -8.4% 954.56 ± 63% -81.8% 190.25 ± 44% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 463.55 ± 83% -3.7% 446.18 ± 87% -85.8% 65.73 ± 93% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
> 1128 ± 17% -17.7% 928.10 ± 62% -81.0% 214.51 ± 40% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
> 500.79 ± 50% -25.9% 370.90 ± 79% -76.0% 120.40 ± 46% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.mutex_lock.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
> 744.38 ± 27% +0.4% 747.54 ± 78% -86.3% 102.18 ± 71% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
> 579.24 ± 43% -10.1% 520.76 ± 62% -65.3% 201.13 ± 62% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
> 1945 ± 16% -15.9% 1635 ± 61% -73.4% 516.65 ± 40% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
> 1530 ± 22% -7.2% 1420 ± 63% -75.5% 375.37 ± 40% perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 3.03 ± 23% -26.5% 2.23 ± 59% -65.2% 1.05 ± 38% perf-sched.total_sch_delay.average.ms
> 8.72 ± 23% -28.5% 6.23 ± 59% -64.2% 3.12 ± 38% perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.average.ms
> 8284 ± 27% -38.2% 5118 ± 60% -41.6% 4839 ± 44% perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.max.ms
> 5.68 ± 23% -29.6% 4.00 ± 59% -63.7% 2.06 ± 38% perf-sched.total_wait_time.average.ms
> 5811 ± 8% -28.5% 4155 ± 59% -27.8% 4194 ± 38% perf-sched.total_wait_time.max.ms
> 37.25 ± 91% +17.8% 43.88 ± 72% -90.7% 3.45 ±136% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof
> 44.86 ± 74% +10.0% 49.33 ±117% -95.6% 1.99 ±132% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.allocate_slab.___slab_alloc
> 22.30 ± 21% +6.1% 23.66 ± 59% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
> 17.29 ± 21% -28.7% 12.33 ± 66% -60.1% 6.90 ± 45% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
> 28.98 ± 21% -13.8% 24.98 ± 61% -74.3% 7.45 ± 39% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 27.08 ± 28% -10.4% 24.27 ± 64% -93.8% 1.69 ±129% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
> 27.52 ± 28% -37.8% 17.11 ± 61% -54.9% 12.40 ± 37% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi.[unknown].[unknown]
> 38.19 ± 43% -40.4% 22.76 ± 65% -80.4% 7.50 ± 40% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
> 45.63 ± 24% -25.8% 33.84 ± 59% -53.4% 21.28 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
> 5.06 ± 24% -30.6% 3.51 ± 60% -65.6% 1.74 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 7.23 ± 22% -18.4% 5.90 ± 59% -64.2% 2.59 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.[unknown]
> 17219 ± 26% +18.6% 20422 ± 60% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
> 287.02 ± 72% -56.9% 123.78 ± 90% -90.0% 28.73 ±130% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.allocate_slab.___slab_alloc
> 2851 ± 25% -5.3% 2699 ± 64% -100.0% 0.00 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
> 2443 ± 4% -23.0% 1881 ± 58% -37.8% 1519 ± 53% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
> 2132 ± 23% -9.7% 1925 ± 63% -82.0% 384.48 ± 45% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 3449 ± 45% -35.6% 2220 ± 71% -59.1% 1410 ± 49% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.do_wait.kernel_wait4.__do_sys_wait4.do_syscall_64
> 1507 ± 27% +0.2% 1510 ± 79% -93.3% 101.36 ±137% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
> 1312 ± 35% -16.4% 1097 ± 61% -65.2% 456.55 ± 64% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
> 3951 ± 16% -17.0% 3278 ± 61% -73.7% 1038 ± 40% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
> 3088 ± 22% -7.9% 2844 ± 62% -75.1% 768.96 ± 41% perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 3.31 ±123% -42.6% 1.90 ± 86% -89.1% 0.36 ± 88% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__alloc_pages_noprof.alloc_pages_mpol_noprof.folio_alloc_mpol_noprof.shmem_alloc_folio
> 28.79 ±114% -6.6% 26.89 ± 70% -90.2% 2.82 ± 96% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof
> 39.14 ± 89% +8.3% 42.40 ±140% -95.1% 1.92 ± 78% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_noprof.alloc_slab_obj_exts.allocate_slab.___slab_alloc
> 14.42 ± 21% +3.3% 14.89 ± 59% -88.8% 1.61 ± 37% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
> 10.13 ± 17% -31.7% 6.92 ± 63% -52.6% 4.80 ± 41% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.affine_move_task.__set_cpus_allowed_ptr.__sched_setaffinity
> 40.86 ±110% -46.6% 21.80 ±152% -99.1% 0.35 ±248% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.stop_two_cpus.migrate_swap.task_numa_migrate
> 6.56 ± 23% -5.6% 6.20 ± 59% -61.9% 2.50 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
> 18.72 ± 22% -16.2% 15.69 ± 61% -74.3% 4.81 ± 39% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 2.82 ± 43% -22.6% 2.18 ± 73% -83.9% 0.45 ± 59% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
> 5.03 ± 24% -6.1% 4.72 ± 59% -63.4% 1.84 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
> 3.16 ± 33% -19.7% 2.54 ± 65% -60.4% 1.25 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.mutex_lock.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
> 4.13 ± 87% +0.3% 4.15 ± 88% -86.0% 0.58 ±133% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.shmem_inode_acct_blocks.shmem_alloc_and_add_folio.shmem_get_folio_gfp.shmem_write_begin
> 4.42 ± 44% -21.0% 3.49 ± 65% -71.3% 1.27 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.__cond_resched.task_work_run.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> 224.55 ± 53% -20.5% 178.59 ± 71% -71.8% 63.25 ± 68% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.do_wait.kernel_wait4.__do_sys_wait4.do_syscall_64
> 17.95 ± 30% -15.9% 15.10 ± 63% -89.3% 1.91 ± 46% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
> 17.58 ± 26% -37.5% 10.98 ± 61% -53.8% 8.12 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi.[unknown].[unknown]
> 27.13 ± 39% -38.5% 16.68 ± 63% -76.3% 6.43 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
> 29.27 ± 24% -26.9% 21.39 ± 59% -53.2% 13.71 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
> 3.29 ± 24% -31.7% 2.25 ± 60% -65.3% 1.14 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 4.57 ± 22% -20.1% 3.66 ± 59% -64.4% 1.63 ± 38% perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.[unknown]
> 1446 ± 25% -3.4% 1396 ± 63% -80.6% 280.50 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof.kmalloc_reserve.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags
> 292.35 ±159% -68.1% 93.21 ±217% -99.8% 0.69 ±256% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.__wait_for_common.stop_two_cpus.migrate_swap.task_numa_migrate
> 932.87 ± 20% -20.6% 740.44 ± 65% -81.7% 170.42 ± 45% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
> 1110 ± 24% -11.8% 979.30 ± 62% -81.7% 203.13 ± 43% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.aa_sk_perm.security_socket_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 463.55 ± 83% -3.7% 446.18 ± 87% -85.8% 65.73 ± 93% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
> 1203 ± 20% -19.5% 969.24 ± 62% -80.5% 234.88 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
> 614.81 ± 41% -27.8% 443.79 ± 79% -79.3% 127.43 ± 46% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.mutex_lock.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
> 822.39 ± 32% -24.1% 624.54 ± 74% -82.9% 140.70 ± 43% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.__cond_resched.task_work_run.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> 817.75 ± 28% -6.8% 762.54 ± 79% -85.7% 117.26 ± 58% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown].[unknown]
> 774.10 ± 27% -22.5% 600.11 ± 61% -63.0% 286.19 ± 57% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.rcu_gp_fqs_loop.rcu_gp_kthread.kthread
> 2023 ± 16% -18.8% 1643 ± 60% -74.2% 521.59 ± 40% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
> 1624 ± 25% -12.1% 1428 ± 62% -75.0% 405.54 ± 42% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 2801 ± 45% -40.4% 1669 ± 81% -54.5% 1273 ± 52% perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.[unknown]
> 55.19 -0.7 54.46 -0.6 54.55 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.read
> 53.91 -0.6 53.30 -0.8 53.13 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
> 53.76 -0.6 53.16 -0.8 52.98 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
> 52.41 -0.5 51.92 -1.1 51.32 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
> 52.02 -0.5 51.56 -1.1 50.92 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
> 50.82 -0.4 50.46 -1.2 49.67 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_read_iter.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> 50.29 -0.3 49.98 -1.2 49.12 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter.vfs_read.ksys_read.do_syscall_64
> 49.61 -0.3 49.36 -1.2 48.42 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter.vfs_read.ksys_read
> 49.37 -0.2 49.13 -1.2 48.17 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter.vfs_read
> 24.50 -0.2 24.29 ± 4% -1.1 23.39 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 5.54 ± 2% -0.2 5.34 ± 6% -0.3 5.25 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_read_actor.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
> 5.49 ± 2% -0.2 5.29 ± 6% -0.3 5.20 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.skb_copy_datagram_iter.unix_stream_read_actor.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
> 5.40 ± 2% -0.2 5.21 ± 6% -0.3 5.11 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__skb_datagram_iter.skb_copy_datagram_iter.unix_stream_read_actor.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 24.31 -0.2 24.12 ± 4% -1.1 23.20 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
> 2.86 ± 2% -0.2 2.68 ± 5% -0.2 2.65 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__memcg_slab_free_hook.kmem_cache_free.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
> 1.60 ± 2% -0.1 1.45 ± 5% -0.0 1.57 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64.read
> 1.50 ± 2% -0.1 1.36 ± 6% -0.0 1.50 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64.write
> 0.62 ± 2% -0.1 0.50 ± 38% +0.3 0.95 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.enqueue_task_fair.ttwu_do_activate.try_to_wake_up.autoremove_wake_function.__wake_up_common
> 2.76 ± 2% -0.1 2.66 ± 6% -0.3 2.45 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.simple_copy_to_iter.__skb_datagram_iter.skb_copy_datagram_iter.unix_stream_read_actor.unix_stream_read_generic
> 2.65 ± 2% -0.1 2.55 ± 6% -0.3 2.34 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__check_object_size.simple_copy_to_iter.__skb_datagram_iter.skb_copy_datagram_iter.unix_stream_read_actor
> 0.97 ± 2% -0.1 0.89 ± 5% +0.3 1.26 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.read
> 0.78 ± 2% -0.1 0.71 ± 7% +0.4 1.18 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ttwu_do_activate.try_to_wake_up.autoremove_wake_function.__wake_up_common.__wake_up_sync_key
> 1.24 ± 2% -0.1 1.16 ± 5% +0.1 1.31 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.alloc_skb_with_frags.sock_alloc_send_pskb
> 2.20 ± 2% -0.1 2.14 ± 6% -0.3 1.90 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.check_heap_object.__check_object_size.simple_copy_to_iter.__skb_datagram_iter.skb_copy_datagram_iter
> 26.13 -0.0 26.09 ± 3% -1.0 25.11 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
> 0.53 ± 2% -0.0 0.49 ± 38% +0.3 0.79 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dequeue_task_fair.__schedule.schedule.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait
> 1.03 ± 3% -0.0 1.02 ± 9% +0.1 1.12 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.skb_set_owner_w.sock_alloc_send_pskb.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 0.66 ± 2% -0.0 0.65 ± 6% +0.1 0.79 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.write
> 0.00 +0.0 0.00 +0.6 0.61 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.enqueue_entity.enqueue_task_fair.ttwu_do_activate.try_to_wake_up.autoremove_wake_function
> 1.83 ± 2% +0.1 1.88 ± 6% +0.8 2.61 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.schedule.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 1.87 ± 2% +0.1 1.93 ± 6% +0.8 2.68 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg
> 1.79 ± 2% +0.1 1.85 ± 6% +0.8 2.56 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__schedule.schedule.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic
> 2.30 ± 2% +0.1 2.37 ± 6% +1.0 3.30 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_data_wait.unix_stream_read_generic.unix_stream_recvmsg.sock_recvmsg.sock_read_iter
> 0.40 ± 53% +0.1 0.48 ± 38% +0.4 0.77 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dequeue_entities.dequeue_task_fair.__schedule.schedule.schedule_timeout
> 0.00 +0.3 0.26 ±100% +0.6 0.61 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.pick_next_task_fair.__schedule.schedule.schedule_timeout.unix_stream_data_wait
> 1.62 ± 3% +0.3 1.93 ± 24% +0.9 2.48 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.try_to_wake_up.autoremove_wake_function.__wake_up_common.__wake_up_sync_key.sock_def_readable
> 1.63 ± 3% +0.3 1.94 ± 24% +0.9 2.50 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.autoremove_wake_function.__wake_up_common.__wake_up_sync_key.sock_def_readable.unix_stream_sendmsg
> 1.71 ± 3% +0.3 2.03 ± 23% +0.9 2.61 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__wake_up_common.__wake_up_sync_key.sock_def_readable.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter
> 39.00 +0.5 39.50 +0.1 39.13 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> 37.56 +0.6 38.15 +0.1 37.67 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64
> 1.96 ± 3% +0.7 2.63 ± 24% +1.1 3.08 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__wake_up_sync_key.sock_def_readable.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write
> 3.52 ± 2% +0.7 4.23 ± 15% +1.1 4.62 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sock_def_readable.unix_stream_sendmsg.sock_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
> 55.93 -0.8 55.12 -0.7 55.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.read
> 52.45 -0.5 51.95 -1.1 51.36 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ksys_read
> 52.06 -0.5 51.60 -1.1 50.96 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_read
> 50.85 -0.4 50.48 -1.2 49.69 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_read_iter
> 50.34 -0.3 50.03 -1.2 49.17 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_recvmsg
> 4.68 ± 2% -0.3 4.38 ± 5% -0.2 4.49 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__memcg_slab_free_hook
> 49.64 -0.3 49.38 -1.2 48.45 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_recvmsg
> 49.50 -0.2 49.25 -1.2 48.30 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_read_generic
> 24.52 -0.2 24.32 ± 4% -1.1 23.41 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.alloc_skb_with_frags
> 5.57 ± 2% -0.2 5.36 ± 6% -0.3 5.27 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_read_actor
> 5.52 ± 2% -0.2 5.31 ± 6% -0.3 5.22 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.skb_copy_datagram_iter
> 24.38 -0.2 24.18 ± 4% -1.1 23.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__alloc_skb
> 5.43 ± 2% -0.2 5.24 ± 6% -0.3 5.14 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__skb_datagram_iter
> 95.87 -0.2 95.70 -0.5 95.42 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> 3.46 ± 2% -0.2 3.29 ± 6% -0.3 3.16 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__check_object_size
> 1.77 ± 2% -0.2 1.61 ± 5% -0.0 1.76 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64
> 1.87 ± 2% -0.2 1.72 ± 5% +0.0 1.87 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.mod_objcg_state
> 95.57 -0.1 95.43 -0.5 95.11 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64
> 2.79 ± 2% -0.1 2.68 ± 6% -0.3 2.48 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.simple_copy_to_iter
> 2.62 ± 2% -0.1 2.53 ± 6% -0.3 2.33 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.check_heap_object
> 1.69 ± 2% -0.1 1.60 ± 5% +0.4 2.12 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode
> 0.90 ± 2% -0.1 0.83 ± 5% -0.0 0.90 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSRETQ_unsafe_stack
> 0.85 ± 2% -0.1 0.78 ± 5% +0.0 0.86 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.obj_cgroup_charge
> 0.10 ± 4% -0.1 0.04 ±104% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__handle_mm_fault
> 0.10 ± 4% -0.1 0.04 ±104% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.handle_mm_fault
> 0.10 ± 4% -0.1 0.04 ±102% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_user_addr_fault
> 0.10 ± 4% -0.1 0.04 ±102% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.exc_page_fault
> 0.63 ± 2% -0.1 0.57 ± 5% +0.0 0.64 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__cond_resched
> 26.17 -0.0 26.13 ± 3% -1.0 25.15 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_alloc_send_pskb
> 0.10 ± 4% -0.0 0.05 ± 63% +0.0 0.10 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.asm_exc_page_fault
> 0.32 ± 2% -0.0 0.28 ± 3% +0.0 0.33 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_mm_cid_work
> 0.32 ± 2% -0.0 0.28 ± 3% +0.0 0.33 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_work_run
> 0.34 ± 2% -0.0 0.30 ± 5% -0.0 0.34 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_all_qs
> 0.32 ± 3% -0.0 0.29 ± 6% +0.0 0.33 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__virt_addr_valid
> 0.32 ± 3% -0.0 0.29 ± 5% +0.0 0.36 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret
> 0.05 -0.0 0.02 ±129% +0.0 0.07 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.avg_vruntime
> 0.18 ± 4% -0.0 0.16 ± 7% +0.1 0.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__enqueue_entity
> 0.47 ± 2% -0.0 0.44 ± 5% +0.0 0.50 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.mutex_lock
> 0.23 ± 3% -0.0 0.21 ± 6% +0.1 0.33 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.set_next_entity
> 0.14 ± 4% -0.0 0.12 ± 4% +0.1 0.20 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__dequeue_entity
> 1.05 ± 3% -0.0 1.04 ± 9% +0.1 1.14 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.skb_set_owner_w
> 0.28 ± 2% -0.0 0.26 ± 7% +0.1 0.38 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.switch_fpu_return
> 0.48 ± 2% -0.0 0.47 ± 6% +0.2 0.70 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.enqueue_entity
> 0.08 ± 3% -0.0 0.07 ± 9% +0.0 0.13 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi
> 0.24 ± 4% -0.0 0.22 ± 6% +0.1 0.31 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__rseq_handle_notify_resume
> 0.06 -0.0 0.05 +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuacct_charge
> 0.29 ± 3% -0.0 0.28 ± 7% +0.1 0.40 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.switch_mm_irqs_off
> 0.16 ± 2% -0.0 0.15 ± 4% +0.0 0.18 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare
> 0.12 ± 3% -0.0 0.12 ± 6% +0.1 0.18 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock_task
> 0.18 ± 3% -0.0 0.17 ± 6% +0.1 0.24 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.restore_fpregs_from_fpstate
> 0.18 ± 4% -0.0 0.17 ± 6% +0.1 0.23 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rseq_ip_fixup
> 0.05 ± 6% -0.0 0.04 ± 37% +0.0 0.07 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rseq_update_cpu_node_id
> 0.05 -0.0 0.04 ± 37% +0.0 0.06 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_clock
> 0.07 ± 7% -0.0 0.06 ± 9% +0.0 0.09 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.os_xsave
> 0.13 ± 6% -0.0 0.12 ± 6% +0.0 0.17 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rseq_get_rseq_cs
> 0.12 ± 6% -0.0 0.12 ± 7% +0.0 0.16 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__get_user_8
> 0.14 ± 3% -0.0 0.13 ± 7% +0.1 0.20 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.wakeup_preempt
> 0.09 ± 5% -0.0 0.09 ± 5% +0.0 0.11 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cgroup_rstat_updated
> 0.14 ± 3% -0.0 0.13 ± 4% +0.0 0.18 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_se
> 0.18 ± 2% -0.0 0.17 ± 2% -0.0 0.14 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.put_cpu_partial
> 0.13 ± 3% -0.0 0.13 ± 7% +0.0 0.16 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pick_eevdf
> 0.07 ± 4% -0.0 0.07 ± 7% +0.0 0.10 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.check_preempt_wakeup_fair
> 0.08 ± 5% -0.0 0.08 ± 8% +0.0 0.13 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_curr_se
> 0.06 ± 5% -0.0 0.06 ± 5% +0.0 0.07 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_clock_cpu
> 0.07 +0.0 0.07 ± 7% +0.0 0.11 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.put_prev_entity
> 0.00 +0.0 0.00 +0.1 0.05 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__put_user_8
> 0.06 ± 10% +0.0 0.06 ± 21% +0.4 0.43 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_any_partial
> 0.22 ± 3% +0.0 0.22 ± 7% +0.1 0.31 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_cfs_group
> 0.06 ± 6% +0.0 0.06 ± 10% +0.0 0.09 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.___perf_sw_event
> 0.12 ± 2% +0.0 0.12 ± 7% +0.1 0.17 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.wake_affine
> 0.07 +0.0 0.07 ± 11% +0.0 0.10 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_min_vruntime
> 0.10 ± 4% +0.0 0.11 ± 7% +0.0 0.15 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_cfs_rq
> 0.05 ± 35% +0.0 0.06 ± 5% +0.0 0.08 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_tp_event
> 0.09 ± 35% +0.0 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.14 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_trace_sched_wakeup_template
> 0.05 ± 36% +0.0 0.05 ± 6% +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.place_entity
> 0.07 ± 4% +0.0 0.08 ± 9% +0.0 0.10 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_h_load
> 0.00 +0.0 0.01 ±264% +0.1 0.06 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.native_irq_return_iret
> 0.12 ± 4% +0.0 0.12 ± 8% +0.1 0.17 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__switch_to
> 0.12 ± 3% +0.0 0.13 ± 6% +0.0 0.16 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__switch_to_asm
> 0.75 ± 2% +0.0 0.76 ± 7% +0.3 1.08 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.enqueue_task_fair
> 0.16 ± 5% +0.0 0.17 ± 7% +0.0 0.20 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_tick_fair
> 0.47 ± 2% +0.0 0.49 ± 6% +0.2 0.64 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_load_avg
> 0.64 ± 2% +0.0 0.65 ± 6% +0.3 0.90 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dequeue_task_fair
> 0.76 ± 2% +0.0 0.78 ± 4% +0.2 0.98 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pick_next_task_fair
> 0.22 ± 3% +0.0 0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.28 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pick_task_fair
> 0.12 ± 4% +0.0 0.13 ± 14% +0.1 0.17 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.reweight_entity
> 0.20 ± 3% +0.0 0.22 ± 6% +0.0 0.24 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_tick
> 0.88 ± 2% +0.0 0.90 ± 7% +0.4 1.29 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ttwu_do_activate
> 0.30 ± 4% +0.0 0.32 ± 7% +0.1 0.38 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_handler
> 0.35 ± 2% +0.0 0.37 ± 5% +0.1 0.49 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dequeue_entity
> 0.31 ± 4% +0.0 0.33 ± 6% +0.1 0.38 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__hrtimer_run_queues
> 0.29 ± 4% +0.0 0.31 ± 6% +0.1 0.36 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_process_times
> 0.13 ± 2% +0.0 0.15 ± 11% +0.1 0.19 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.finish_task_switch
> 0.18 ± 2% +0.0 0.21 ± 8% +0.1 0.26 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.prepare_task_switch
> 0.35 ± 3% +0.0 0.37 ± 5% +0.1 0.43 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.hrtimer_interrupt
> 0.35 ± 3% +0.0 0.37 ± 6% +0.1 0.44 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
> 0.63 ± 2% +0.0 0.65 ± 7% +0.3 0.89 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dequeue_entities
> 0.09 ± 8% +0.0 0.12 ± 7% +0.0 0.11 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.generic_perform_write
> 2.21 ± 2% +0.0 2.23 ± 6% +0.8 3.04 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.schedule_timeout
> 0.07 ± 10% +0.0 0.10 ± 11% +0.0 0.08 ± 20% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_balance_find_src_group
> 0.06 ± 10% +0.0 0.09 ± 11% +0.0 0.06 ± 40% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_sg_lb_stats
> 0.07 ± 10% +0.0 0.10 ± 11% +0.0 0.07 ± 19% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_sd_lb_stats
> 0.10 ± 3% +0.0 0.13 ± 14% +0.0 0.13 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock
> 0.01 ±282% +0.0 0.04 ± 57% +0.1 0.06 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.native_sched_clock
> 0.43 ± 3% +0.0 0.47 ± 7% +0.2 0.64 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_curr
> 0.13 ± 8% +0.0 0.16 ± 8% +0.0 0.16 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.writen
> 0.39 ± 3% +0.0 0.42 ± 6% +0.1 0.48 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
> 0.42 ± 3% +0.0 0.46 ± 6% +0.1 0.52 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
> 0.02 ±111% +0.0 0.06 ± 13% +0.0 0.04 ± 38% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.set_task_cpu
> 0.02 ±141% +0.0 0.06 ± 11% +0.0 0.06 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ring_buffer_read_head
> 2.45 ± 2% +0.0 2.50 ± 6% +1.0 3.43 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.schedule
> 0.00 +0.1 0.06 ± 8% +0.0 0.03 ± 77% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vruntime_eligible
> 0.22 ± 8% +0.1 0.28 ± 9% +0.1 0.27 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_mmap__push
> 0.23 ± 8% +0.1 0.29 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.record__mmap_read_evlist
> 0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.29 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cmd_record
> 0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.30 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.handle_internal_command
> 0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.30 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.main
> 0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.30 ± 9% +0.1 0.28 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.run_builtin
> 2.31 ± 2% +0.1 2.38 ± 7% +1.0 3.32 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_data_wait
> 0.18 ± 38% +0.1 0.26 ± 17% +0.2 0.41 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ordered_events__queue
> 0.18 ± 38% +0.1 0.26 ± 17% +0.2 0.41 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.queue_event
> 0.19 ± 37% +0.1 0.26 ± 16% +0.2 0.41 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.process_simple
> 0.00 +0.1 0.07 ± 19% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.schedule_idle
> 0.19 ± 37% +0.1 0.29 ± 17% +0.2 0.42 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.perf_session__process_events
> 0.19 ± 37% +0.1 0.29 ± 17% +0.2 0.42 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.reader__read_event
> 0.19 ± 37% +0.1 0.29 ± 17% +0.2 0.42 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.record__finish_output
> 2.45 ± 2% +0.1 2.56 ± 6% +1.0 3.43 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__schedule
> 0.00 +0.1 0.12 ± 19% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.flush_smp_call_function_queue
> 0.42 ± 18% +0.1 0.54 ± 23% +0.3 0.70 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__cmd_record
> 0.00 +0.1 0.14 ± 20% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sched_ttwu_pending
> 0.00 +0.2 0.15 ± 17% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.intel_idle
> 0.00 +0.2 0.17 ± 18% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__flush_smp_call_function_queue
> 0.01 ±282% +0.2 0.18 ± 70% +0.1 0.06 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.available_idle_cpu
> 0.23 ± 3% +0.2 0.43 ± 16% +0.1 0.31 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.prepare_to_wait
> 0.00 +0.2 0.20 ± 18% +0.0 0.03 ±104% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter
> 0.00 +0.2 0.20 ± 18% +0.0 0.03 ±104% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state
> 0.01 ±282% +0.2 0.22 ± 16% +0.0 0.04 ± 81% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_idle_call
> 3.50 ± 2% +0.2 3.73 ± 8% +0.4 3.87 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock
> 1.81 ± 3% +0.3 2.12 ± 22% +0.9 2.68 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.autoremove_wake_function
> 1.80 ± 3% +0.3 2.12 ± 22% +0.9 2.66 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.try_to_wake_up
> 1.89 ± 3% +0.3 2.22 ± 21% +0.9 2.80 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__wake_up_common
> 0.00 +0.3 0.35 ±110% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.select_idle_cpu
> 0.06 ± 6% +0.4 0.41 ± 95% +0.0 0.09 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.select_idle_sibling
> 0.22 ± 2% +0.4 0.57 ± 70% +0.1 0.31 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.select_task_rq_fair
> 0.26 ± 5% +0.4 0.62 ± 65% +0.1 0.38 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.select_task_rq
> 0.04 ± 77% +0.4 0.43 ± 18% +0.1 0.10 ± 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.start_secondary
> 0.04 ± 77% +0.4 0.43 ± 18% +0.1 0.10 ± 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_idle
> 0.04 ± 77% +0.4 0.43 ± 17% +0.1 0.10 ± 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.common_startup_64
> 0.04 ± 77% +0.4 0.43 ± 17% +0.1 0.10 ± 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpu_startup_entry
> 40.28 +0.4 40.71 +0.2 40.46 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_write
> 39.04 +0.5 39.54 +0.1 39.18 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_write_iter
> 37.73 +0.6 38.31 +0.1 37.84 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unix_stream_sendmsg
> 2.15 ± 3% +0.7 2.82 ± 23% +1.1 3.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__wake_up_sync_key
> 3.55 ± 2% +0.7 4.25 ± 15% +1.1 4.65 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sock_def_readable
> 2.90 ± 2% -0.2 2.74 ± 5% -0.2 2.69 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__memcg_slab_free_hook
> 1.50 ± 2% -0.1 1.37 ± 5% +0.0 1.51 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.mod_objcg_state
> 1.41 ± 2% -0.1 1.30 ± 5% -0.2 1.20 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.kmem_cache_free
> 0.83 ± 3% -0.1 0.74 ± 5% -0.0 0.81 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.read
> 0.88 ± 2% -0.1 0.80 ± 5% -0.0 0.88 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.entry_SYSRETQ_unsafe_stack
> 0.74 ± 2% -0.1 0.67 ± 5% +0.0 0.75 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.write
> 0.70 ± 2% -0.1 0.64 ± 6% +0.0 0.73 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.vfs_read
> 0.67 ± 2% -0.1 0.61 ± 5% +0.0 0.68 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.vfs_write
> 2.19 ± 2% -0.1 2.13 ± 6% -0.3 1.88 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.check_heap_object
> 0.67 ± 2% -0.1 0.62 ± 4% -0.0 0.65 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof
> 0.52 ± 3% -0.1 0.47 ± 4% -0.0 0.52 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.obj_cgroup_charge
> 0.51 ± 2% -0.0 0.46 ± 5% -0.0 0.51 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof
> 0.29 ± 2% -0.0 0.25 ± 3% +0.0 0.31 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.task_mm_cid_work
> 0.43 ± 2% -0.0 0.40 ± 4% +0.0 0.44 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64
> 0.34 ± 3% -0.0 0.31 ± 6% +0.0 0.35 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__skb_datagram_iter
> 0.29 ± 2% -0.0 0.26 ± 6% +0.0 0.30 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__virt_addr_valid
> 0.33 ± 2% -0.0 0.30 ± 6% +0.0 0.33 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__cond_resched
> 0.28 ± 3% -0.0 0.25 ± 5% +0.0 0.31 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret
> 0.37 ± 2% -0.0 0.34 ± 6% -0.0 0.36 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__check_object_size
> 0.18 ± 5% -0.0 0.15 ± 6% +0.1 0.27 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__enqueue_entity
> 0.70 -0.0 0.67 ± 2% -0.1 0.60 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_partial_node
> 0.21 ± 3% -0.0 0.18 ± 6% -0.0 0.21 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_all_qs
> 0.22 ± 3% -0.0 0.20 ± 6% -0.0 0.22 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.x64_sys_call
> 0.34 ± 2% -0.0 0.32 ± 5% +0.0 0.37 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_exit_to_user_mode
> 1.75 ± 2% -0.0 1.72 ± 5% -0.1 1.63 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__alloc_skb
> 0.95 -0.0 0.93 -0.1 0.87 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.___slab_alloc
> 0.42 ± 2% -0.0 0.40 ± 7% +0.0 0.45 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.skb_release_data
> 0.19 ± 2% -0.0 0.17 ± 6% -0.0 0.18 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rw_verify_area
> 1.03 ± 3% -0.0 1.02 ± 9% +0.1 1.12 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.skb_set_owner_w
> 0.03 ± 89% -0.0 0.01 ±173% +0.0 0.06 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.avg_vruntime
> 0.06 ± 5% -0.0 0.04 ± 37% +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.cpuacct_charge
> 0.32 ± 2% -0.0 0.30 ± 5% +0.0 0.34 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.mutex_lock
> 0.11 ± 4% -0.0 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.15 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__dequeue_entity
> 0.06 ± 8% -0.0 0.05 ± 38% +0.0 0.08 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.prepare_to_wait
> 0.18 ± 3% -0.0 0.17 ± 7% +0.1 0.24 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.restore_fpregs_from_fpstate
> 0.11 ± 4% -0.0 0.10 ± 6% +0.1 0.17 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock_task
> 0.29 ± 3% -0.0 0.28 ± 7% +0.1 0.40 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.switch_mm_irqs_off
> 0.12 ± 3% -0.0 0.11 ± 7% +0.0 0.15 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__get_user_8
> 0.05 -0.0 0.04 ± 37% +0.0 0.07 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rseq_update_cpu_node_id
> 0.01 ±282% -0.0 0.00 +0.1 0.06 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.place_entity
> 0.09 ± 3% -0.0 0.08 ± 8% +0.0 0.13 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.unix_stream_data_wait
> 0.22 ± 3% -0.0 0.22 ± 7% +0.1 0.31 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_cfs_group
> 0.05 ± 8% -0.0 0.05 ± 40% +0.0 0.07 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.dequeue_entities
> 0.10 ± 5% -0.0 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.15 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.switch_fpu_return
> 0.05 -0.0 0.05 ± 38% +0.0 0.06 ± 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.___perf_sw_event
> 0.05 -0.0 0.05 ± 38% +0.0 0.07 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.enqueue_task_fair
> 0.13 ± 3% -0.0 0.12 ± 5% +0.0 0.17 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_se
> 0.10 ± 3% -0.0 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.14 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.try_to_wake_up
> 0.17 -0.0 0.17 -0.0 0.13 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.put_cpu_partial
> 0.06 ± 7% -0.0 0.06 ± 9% +0.0 0.09 ± 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.os_xsave
> 0.32 -0.0 0.32 ± 2% -0.0 0.28 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__put_partials
> 0.08 ± 3% -0.0 0.08 ± 6% +0.0 0.12 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_curr_se
> 0.09 ± 5% -0.0 0.09 ± 7% +0.0 0.14 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.schedule_timeout
> 0.11 ± 4% -0.0 0.11 ± 6% +0.0 0.13 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.pick_eevdf
> 0.06 ± 5% -0.0 0.06 ± 5% +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.dequeue_entity
> 0.06 -0.0 0.06 ± 8% +0.0 0.08 ± 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.pick_task_fair
> 0.00 +0.0 0.00 +0.1 0.05 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.select_task_rq_fair
> 0.00 +0.0 0.00 +0.1 0.06 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.reweight_entity
> 0.09 ± 3% +0.0 0.09 ± 5% +0.0 0.13 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.finish_task_switch
> 0.07 ± 7% +0.0 0.07 ± 8% +0.0 0.10 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_min_vruntime
> 0.23 ± 2% +0.0 0.23 ± 7% +0.1 0.30 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_load_avg
> 0.07 ± 9% +0.0 0.07 ± 9% +0.0 0.10 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.task_h_load
> 0.10 ± 3% +0.0 0.10 ± 6% +0.0 0.14 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__update_load_avg_cfs_rq
> 0.04 ± 53% +0.0 0.04 ± 38% +0.0 0.07 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.select_task_rq
> 0.00 +0.0 0.01 ±264% +0.1 0.06 ± 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.native_irq_return_iret
> 0.12 ± 2% +0.0 0.13 ± 6% +0.0 0.16 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__switch_to_asm
> 0.01 ±187% +0.0 0.02 ±129% +0.0 0.06 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.perf_tp_event
> 0.11 ± 3% +0.0 0.12 ± 8% +0.0 0.16 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__switch_to
> 0.08 ± 5% +0.0 0.09 ± 7% +0.0 0.12 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__wake_up_common
> 0.24 ± 2% +0.0 0.26 ± 7% +0.1 0.35 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__schedule
> 0.12 ± 5% +0.0 0.14 ± 11% +0.1 0.18 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_curr
> 0.00 +0.0 0.02 ±129% +0.1 0.05 ± 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.native_sched_clock
> 0.13 ± 3% +0.0 0.15 ± 7% +0.1 0.18 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.prepare_task_switch
> 0.05 +0.0 0.08 ± 23% +0.0 0.06 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_rq_clock
> 0.00 +0.0 0.04 ± 38% +0.1 0.05 ± 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.enqueue_entity
> 0.00 +0.1 0.06 ± 11% +0.0 0.05 ± 38% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ring_buffer_read_head
> 0.18 ± 37% +0.1 0.25 ± 17% +0.2 0.40 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.queue_event
> 0.00 +0.2 0.15 ± 17% +0.0 0.00 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.intel_idle
> 0.01 ±282% +0.2 0.18 ± 70% +0.0 0.05 ± 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.available_idle_cpu
On 2024-09-30 at 10:04:13 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On 2024/9/29 21:51, Oliver Sang wrote:
> > hi, Chenyu and Honglei,
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:28:30PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Honglei,
> >>
> >> On 2024-09-27 at 21:38:53 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
> >>> Hi Yu,
> >>>
> >>> Yep, I understand the preemption should happen in the same cfs level. Just
> >>> not sure the purpose of the 'nr_running check' stuff. Perhaps its role is
> >>> just to judge whether it’s necessary to do the preemption check. If there is
> >>> at least one more ready (cfs) task in the rq and current is not eligible, we
> >>> take care of the waiting tasks. Thoughts?
> >>
> >> I got your point and it makes sense. Whether the preemption check should be triggered
> >> seems to be a heuristic trade-off to me. I'm ok with using more aggressive preemption
> >> strategy as it depends on whether that workload prefers latency or throughput, and as
> >> long as it did not introduce regression :-)
> >>
> >> Oliver, may I know if you happen to have time for a test if the following change
> >> suggested by Honglei would make the regression go away? Thanks.
> >
> > I applied the patch directly upon 85e511df3cec, the test found it can reduce the
> > regression but not totally reovered
> >
> > =========================================================================================
> > compiler/cpufreq_governor/ipc/iterations/kconfig/mode/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/testcase:
> > gcc-12/performance/socket/4/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/50%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-spr-r02/hackbench
> >
> > commit:
> > 82e9d0456e06 ("sched/fair: Avoid re-setting virtual deadline on 'migrations'")
> > 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
> > 8079496d311b <--- patch from Honglei
> >
> > 82e9d0456e06cebe 85e511df3cec46021024176672a 8079496d311b6b0d4dae973f4df
> > ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> > %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
> > \ | \ | \
> > 623219 -13.1% 541887 -3.2% 603080 hackbench.throughput
> >
>
> Thanks a lot for running the test. The result is as expectation, as the
> strategy of short slices tends to favor more frequent scheduling to help
> delay-sensitive tasks acquire CPU as early as possible.
>
> I suspect that the current test environment does not have any special
> configurations for slices. In this case, a 3.2% regression is still
> somewhat significant. As Yu mentioned, this is a heuristic adjustment.
> In this particular case, it seems that Yu's patch is more effective in
> solving the problem. Let's delegate the preemption opportunity to the
> higher-level update_curr() function.
>
Thanks Oliver and Hongwei.
Hi Hongwei, do you mind if I added your Reviewed-by tag on this?
thanks,
Chenyu
On 2024/9/30 10:22, Chen Yu wrote:
> On 2024-09-30 at 10:04:13 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
>> Hi Oliver,
>>
>> On 2024/9/29 21:51, Oliver Sang wrote:
>>> hi, Chenyu and Honglei,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:28:30PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
>>>> Hi Honglei,
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-09-27 at 21:38:53 +0800, Honglei Wang wrote:
>>>>> Hi Yu,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, I understand the preemption should happen in the same cfs level. Just
>>>>> not sure the purpose of the 'nr_running check' stuff. Perhaps its role is
>>>>> just to judge whether it’s necessary to do the preemption check. If there is
>>>>> at least one more ready (cfs) task in the rq and current is not eligible, we
>>>>> take care of the waiting tasks. Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> I got your point and it makes sense. Whether the preemption check should be triggered
>>>> seems to be a heuristic trade-off to me. I'm ok with using more aggressive preemption
>>>> strategy as it depends on whether that workload prefers latency or throughput, and as
>>>> long as it did not introduce regression :-)
>>>>
>>>> Oliver, may I know if you happen to have time for a test if the following change
>>>> suggested by Honglei would make the regression go away? Thanks.
>>>
>>> I applied the patch directly upon 85e511df3cec, the test found it can reduce the
>>> regression but not totally reovered
>>>
>>> =========================================================================================
>>> compiler/cpufreq_governor/ipc/iterations/kconfig/mode/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/testcase:
>>> gcc-12/performance/socket/4/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/50%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-spr-r02/hackbench
>>>
>>> commit:
>>> 82e9d0456e06 ("sched/fair: Avoid re-setting virtual deadline on 'migrations'")
>>> 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
>>> 8079496d311b <--- patch from Honglei
>>>
>>> 82e9d0456e06cebe 85e511df3cec46021024176672a 8079496d311b6b0d4dae973f4df
>>> ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
>>> %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
>>> \ | \ | \
>>> 623219 -13.1% 541887 -3.2% 603080 hackbench.throughput
>>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot for running the test. The result is as expectation, as the
>> strategy of short slices tends to favor more frequent scheduling to help
>> delay-sensitive tasks acquire CPU as early as possible.
>>
>> I suspect that the current test environment does not have any special
>> configurations for slices. In this case, a 3.2% regression is still
>> somewhat significant. As Yu mentioned, this is a heuristic adjustment.
>> In this particular case, it seems that Yu's patch is more effective in
>> solving the problem. Let's delegate the preemption opportunity to the
>> higher-level update_curr() function.
>>
>
> Thanks Oliver and Hongwei.
>
> Hi Hongwei, do you mind if I added your Reviewed-by tag on this?
>
OK. Feel free to include:
Reviewed-by: Honglei Wang <jameshongleiwang@126.com>
Thanks,
Honglei
> thanks,
> Chenyu
The following commit has been merged into the sched/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: d4ac164bde7a12ec0a238a7ead5aa26819bbb1c1
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/d4ac164bde7a12ec0a238a7ead5aa26819bbb1c1
Author: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 16:54:40 +08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 11:27:54 +02:00
sched/eevdf: Fix wakeup-preempt by checking cfs_rq->nr_running
Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
would happen.
Some workloads (like the hackbench reported by lkp) do not like
over-scheduling. We can see that the preemption rate has been
increased by 2.2%:
1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
Restore its previous check criterion.
Fixes: 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231416.9403c2e9-oliver.sang@intel.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Honglei Wang <jameshongleiwang@126.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240925085440.358138-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b63a7ac..ab497fa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
- if (rq->nr_running == 1)
+ if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
return;
if (resched || did_preempt_short(cfs_rq, curr)) {© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.