drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The maple tree register cache uses a more modern data structure than the
rbtree cache and makes implementation decisions more suited to modern
hardware, switch the bd96801 driver to it to take advantage of this newer
code. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c
index 714f08ed544b..f118e63d9b7d 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd96801.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config bd96801_regmap_config = {
.reg_bits = 8,
.val_bits = 8,
.volatile_table = &volatile_regs,
- .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
+ .cache_type = REGCACHE_MAPLE,
};
static int bd96801_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
---
base-commit: 98f7e32f20d28ec452afb208f9cffc08448a2652
change-id: 20240924-mfd-bd96801-maple-cc2e58f891b5
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:22:04 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> The maple tree register cache uses a more modern data structure than the
> rbtree cache and makes implementation decisions more suited to modern
> hardware, switch the bd96801 driver to it to take advantage of this newer
> code. No functional changes.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] mfd: bd96801: Use maple tree register cache
commit: f8e7a05154d0fe3e977e1cbfdc43657cebd560ef
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Hi Mark, On 9/24/24 19:22, Mark Brown wrote: > The maple tree register cache uses a more modern data structure than the > rbtree cache and makes implementation decisions more suited to modern > hardware, switch the bd96801 driver to it to take advantage of this newer > code. No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Thanks! So, I should have used maple tree with regmap instead of the rbtree when sending this... Do you know, is there any occasion where the rbtree would be better? As a unrelated thing - seems like you've made it safely back from the LPC. It was nice finally meeting you :) Yours, -- Matti -- Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 07:57:46AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > Thanks! So, I should have used maple tree with regmap instead of the rbtree > when sending this... Do you know, is there any occasion where the rbtree > would be better? rbtree stores in device native format so large syncs might be more efficient, we can just send directly from the buffer. This could be a good tradeoff for larger syncs running on slower CPUs but it's probably pretty marginal. > As a unrelated thing - seems like you've made it safely back from the LPC. > It was nice finally meeting you :) Actually in Paris for Kernel Recipies so not quite but yes, good to meet you!
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.