The pm_runtime_disable() is missing in probe error path,
so add it to fix it.

Fixes: 92b1f84d46b2 ("drivers/misc: driver for APDS990X ALS and proximity sensors")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/misc/apds990x.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/apds990x.c b/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
index 6d4edd69db12..e7d73c972f65 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ static int apds990x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 		err = chip->pdata->setup_resources();
 		if (err) {
 			err = -EINVAL;
-			goto fail3;
+			goto fail4;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ static int apds990x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 				apds990x_attribute_group);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		dev_err(&chip->client->dev, "Sysfs registration failed\n");
-		goto fail4;
+		goto fail5;
 	}
 
 	err = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
@@ -1166,15 +1166,17 @@ static int apds990x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(&client->dev, "could not get IRQ %d\n",
 			client->irq);
-		goto fail5;
+		goto fail6;
 	}
 	return err;
-fail5:
+fail6:
 	sysfs_remove_group(&chip->client->dev.kobj,
 			&apds990x_attribute_group[0]);
-fail4:
+fail5:
 	if (chip->pdata && chip->pdata->release_resources)
 		chip->pdata->release_resources();
+fail4:
+	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
 fail3:
 	regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs);
 fail2:
-- 
2.34.1

Ping.

On 2024/9/23 11:55, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The pm_runtime_disable() is missing in probe error path,
> so add it to fix it.
> 
> Fixes: 92b1f84d46b2 ("drivers/misc: driver for APDS990X ALS and proximity sensors")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/apds990x.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/apds990x.c b/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
> index 6d4edd69db12..e7d73c972f65 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
> @@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ static int apds990x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  		err = chip->pdata->setup_resources();
>  		if (err) {
>  			err = -EINVAL;
> -			goto fail3;
> +			goto fail4;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ static int apds990x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  				apds990x_attribute_group);
>  	if (err < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&chip->client->dev, "Sysfs registration failed\n");
> -		goto fail4;
> +		goto fail5;
>  	}
>  
>  	err = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
> @@ -1166,15 +1166,17 @@ static int apds990x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "could not get IRQ %d\n",
>  			client->irq);
> -		goto fail5;
> +		goto fail6;
>  	}
>  	return err;
> -fail5:
> +fail6:
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&chip->client->dev.kobj,
>  			&apds990x_attribute_group[0]);
> -fail4:
> +fail5:
>  	if (chip->pdata && chip->pdata->release_resources)
>  		chip->pdata->release_resources();
> +fail4:
> +	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>  fail3:
>  	regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs);
>  fail2:

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 10:37:23AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Ping.

For what?

If you are worried your patches are not being reviewed, please take the
time to review other outstanding patches on the mailing list to make the
workload be decreased for everyone.

thanks,

greg k-h

On 2024/10/13 23:10, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 10:37:23AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> Ping.
> 
> For what?
> 
> If you are worried your patches are not being reviewed, please take the
> time to review other outstanding patches on the mailing list to make the
> workload be decreased for everyone.

Hi, greg

Thank you for your suggestion, I'll try to review other people's patches
 as much as I can.

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h