.../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 356 ------------------ .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++ .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 30 +- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_pagelist.h | 21 -- 4 files changed, 373 insertions(+), 384 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_pagelist.h
Few functions were identified were their declaration, definition and usage were spread (incorrectly) across vchiq_core and vchiq_arm. These are being consolidated into vchiq_core in this series. Please look at individual patches for details. 2/3 is in particular a big one. The code is just a move, but seems big - as it was diffcult to split it into smaller, compilable hunks of individual patches. Umang Jain (3): staging: vchiq_core: Move remote_event_signal() vchiq_core staging: vchiq_core: Move bulk data functions in vchiq_core staging: vchiq_core: Drop vchiq_pagelist.h .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 356 ------------------ .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++ .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 30 +- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_pagelist.h | 21 -- 4 files changed, 373 insertions(+), 384 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_pagelist.h -- 2.45.2
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 07:51:27PM +0530, Umang Jain wrote: > Few functions were identified were their declaration, definition > and usage were spread (incorrectly) across vchiq_core and vchiq_arm. > > These are being consolidated into vchiq_core in this series. > Please look at individual patches for details. > > 2/3 is in particular a big one. The code is just a move, but > seems big - as it was diffcult to split it into smaller, compilable > hunks of individual patches. > > Umang Jain (3): > staging: vchiq_core: Move remote_event_signal() vchiq_core > staging: vchiq_core: Move bulk data functions in vchiq_core > staging: vchiq_core: Drop vchiq_pagelist.h > Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> But next time, if you're just moving code around, just ignore checkpatch. Do the white space changes as a separate patch. regards, dan carpenter +- memcpy_to_page(pages[0], +- pagelist->offset, +- fragments, +- head_bytes); ++ memcpy_to_page(pages[0], pagelist->offset, ++ fragments, head_bytes); } + if ((actual >= 0) && (head_bytes < actual) && + (tail_bytes != 0)) + memcpy_to_page(pages[num_pages - 1], +- (pagelist->offset + actual) & +- (PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(drv_mgmt->info->cache_line_size - 1), +- fragments + drv_mgmt->info->cache_line_size, +- tail_bytes); ++ (pagelist->offset + actual) & ++ (PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(drv_mgmt->info->cache_line_size - 1), ++ fragments + drv_mgmt->info->cache_line_size, ++ tail_bytes);
Hi Dan, On 25/09/24 2:53 pm, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 07:51:27PM +0530, Umang Jain wrote: >> Few functions were identified were their declaration, definition >> and usage were spread (incorrectly) across vchiq_core and vchiq_arm. >> >> These are being consolidated into vchiq_core in this series. >> Please look at individual patches for details. >> >> 2/3 is in particular a big one. The code is just a move, but >> seems big - as it was diffcult to split it into smaller, compilable >> hunks of individual patches. >> >> Umang Jain (3): >> staging: vchiq_core: Move remote_event_signal() vchiq_core >> staging: vchiq_core: Move bulk data functions in vchiq_core >> staging: vchiq_core: Drop vchiq_pagelist.h >> > Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Thanks for reviewing. > > But next time, if you're just moving code around, just ignore checkpatch. Do > the white space changes as a separate patch. Thanks for the tip, will surely keep this mind. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > +- memcpy_to_page(pages[0], > +- pagelist->offset, > +- fragments, > +- head_bytes); > ++ memcpy_to_page(pages[0], pagelist->offset, > ++ fragments, head_bytes); > } > + if ((actual >= 0) && (head_bytes < actual) && > + (tail_bytes != 0)) > + memcpy_to_page(pages[num_pages - 1], > +- (pagelist->offset + actual) & > +- (PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(drv_mgmt->info->cache_line_size - 1), > +- fragments + drv_mgmt->info->cache_line_size, > +- tail_bytes); > ++ (pagelist->offset + actual) & > ++ (PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(drv_mgmt->info->cache_line_size - 1), > ++ fragments + drv_mgmt->info->cache_line_size, > ++ tail_bytes); >
Hi, forgot to mention, series to is built and tested on top of "[PATCH 0/6] staging: vchiq_core: bulk xfer killable() completions" https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20240918163100.870596-1-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com/T/#t On 19/09/24 7:51 pm, Umang Jain wrote: > Few functions were identified were their declaration, definition > and usage were spread (incorrectly) across vchiq_core and vchiq_arm. > > These are being consolidated into vchiq_core in this series. > Please look at individual patches for details. > > 2/3 is in particular a big one. The code is just a move, but > seems big - as it was diffcult to split it into smaller, compilable > hunks of individual patches. > > Umang Jain (3): > staging: vchiq_core: Move remote_event_signal() vchiq_core > staging: vchiq_core: Move bulk data functions in vchiq_core > staging: vchiq_core: Drop vchiq_pagelist.h > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 356 ------------------ > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++ > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 30 +- > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_pagelist.h | 21 -- > 4 files changed, 373 insertions(+), 384 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_pagelist.h >
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.