drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 161 insertions(+)
From: Tarun Alle <Tarun.Alle@microchip.com>
Add support for measuring Signal Quality Index for LAN887x T1 PHY.
Signal Quality Index (SQI) is measure of Link Channel Quality from
0 to 7, with 7 as the best. By default, a link loss event shall
indicate an SQI of 0.
Signed-off-by: Tarun Alle <Tarun.Alle@microchip.com>
---
v3 -> v4
- Added check to handle invalid samples.
- Added macro for ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable).
v2 -> v3
- Replaced hard-coded values with ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable).
v1 -> v2
- Replaced hard-coded 200 with ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable).
- Replaced return value -EINVAL with -ENETDOWN.
- Changed link checks.
---
drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 161 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1.c b/drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1.c
index a5ef8fe50704..e5cc4c8b2265 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/microchip_t1.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/mii.h>
#include <linux/phy.h>
+#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <linux/ethtool.h>
#include <linux/ethtool_netlink.h>
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
@@ -226,6 +227,22 @@
#define MICROCHIP_CABLE_MAX_TIME_DIFF \
(MICROCHIP_CABLE_MIN_TIME_DIFF + MICROCHIP_CABLE_TIME_MARGIN)
+#define LAN887X_COEFF_PWR_DN_CONFIG_100 0x0404
+#define LAN887X_COEFF_PWR_DN_CONFIG_100_V 0x16d6
+#define LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100 0x042e
+#define LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100_V 0x9572
+#define LAN887X_SQI_MSE_100 0x483
+
+#define LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100 0x040d
+#define LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100_EN BIT(0)
+
+#define LAN887X_COEFF_MOD_CONFIG 0x080d
+#define LAN887X_COEFF_MOD_CONFIG_DCQ_COEFF_EN BIT(8)
+
+#define LAN887X_DCQ_SQI_STATUS 0x08b2
+
+#define SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(x, t) (ARRAY_SIZE(t) / (x))
+
#define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Nisar Sayed <nisar.sayed@microchip.com>"
#define DRIVER_DESC "Microchip LAN87XX/LAN937x/LAN887x T1 PHY driver"
@@ -1830,6 +1847,148 @@ static int lan887x_cable_test_get_status(struct phy_device *phydev,
return lan887x_cable_test_report(phydev);
}
+/* Compare block to sort in ascending order */
+static int data_compare(const void *a, const void *b)
+{
+ return *(u16 *)a - *(u16 *)b;
+}
+
+static int lan887x_get_sqi_100M(struct phy_device *phydev)
+{
+ u16 rawtable[200];
+ u32 sqiavg = 0;
+ u8 sqinum = 0;
+ int rc;
+
+ /* Configuration of SQI 100M */
+ rc = phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+ LAN887X_COEFF_PWR_DN_CONFIG_100,
+ LAN887X_COEFF_PWR_DN_CONFIG_100_V);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100,
+ LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100_V);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100);
+ if (rc != LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100_V)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ rc = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100,
+ LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100_EN,
+ LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100_EN);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* Required before reading register
+ * otherwise it will return high value
+ */
+ msleep(50);
+
+ /* Link check before raw readings */
+ rc = genphy_c45_read_link(phydev);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (!phydev->link)
+ return -ENETDOWN;
+
+ /* Get 200 SQI raw readings */
+ for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable); i++) {
+ rc = phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+ LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100,
+ LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100_EN);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+ LAN887X_SQI_MSE_100);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ rawtable[i] = (u16)rc;
+ }
+
+ /* Link check after raw readings */
+ rc = genphy_c45_read_link(phydev);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (!phydev->link)
+ return -ENETDOWN;
+
+ /* Sort SQI raw readings in ascending order */
+ sort(rawtable, ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable), sizeof(u16), data_compare, NULL);
+
+ /* Keep inliers and discard outliers */
+ for (int i = SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(5, rawtable);
+ i < SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(5, rawtable) * 4; i++)
+ sqiavg += rawtable[i];
+
+ /* Handle invalid samples */
+ if (sqiavg != 0) {
+ /* Get SQI average */
+ sqiavg /= SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(5, rawtable) * 4 -
+ SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(5, rawtable);
+
+ if (sqiavg < 75)
+ sqinum = 7;
+ else if (sqiavg < 94)
+ sqinum = 6;
+ else if (sqiavg < 119)
+ sqinum = 5;
+ else if (sqiavg < 150)
+ sqinum = 4;
+ else if (sqiavg < 189)
+ sqinum = 3;
+ else if (sqiavg < 237)
+ sqinum = 2;
+ else if (sqiavg < 299)
+ sqinum = 1;
+ else
+ sqinum = 0;
+ }
+
+ return sqinum;
+}
+
+static int lan887x_get_sqi(struct phy_device *phydev)
+{
+ int rc, val;
+
+ if (phydev->speed != SPEED_1000 &&
+ phydev->speed != SPEED_100) {
+ return -ENETDOWN;
+ }
+
+ if (phydev->speed == SPEED_100)
+ return lan887x_get_sqi_100M(phydev);
+
+ /* Writing DCQ_COEFF_EN to trigger a SQI read */
+ rc = phy_set_bits_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+ LAN887X_COEFF_MOD_CONFIG,
+ LAN887X_COEFF_MOD_CONFIG_DCQ_COEFF_EN);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* Wait for DCQ done */
+ rc = phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
+ LAN887X_COEFF_MOD_CONFIG, val, ((val &
+ LAN887X_COEFF_MOD_CONFIG_DCQ_COEFF_EN) !=
+ LAN887X_COEFF_MOD_CONFIG_DCQ_COEFF_EN),
+ 10, 200, true);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, LAN887X_DCQ_SQI_STATUS);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ return FIELD_GET(T1_DCQ_SQI_MSK, rc);
+}
+
static struct phy_driver microchip_t1_phy_driver[] = {
{
PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_LAN87XX),
@@ -1881,6 +2040,8 @@ static struct phy_driver microchip_t1_phy_driver[] = {
.read_status = genphy_c45_read_status,
.cable_test_start = lan887x_cable_test_start,
.cable_test_get_status = lan887x_cable_test_get_status,
+ .get_sqi = lan887x_get_sqi,
+ .get_sqi_max = lan87xx_get_sqi_max,
}
};
--
2.34.1
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 05:26:57PM +0530, Tarun Alle wrote:
> From: Tarun Alle <Tarun.Alle@microchip.com>
>
> Add support for measuring Signal Quality Index for LAN887x T1 PHY.
> Signal Quality Index (SQI) is measure of Link Channel Quality from
> 0 to 7, with 7 as the best. By default, a link loss event shall
> indicate an SQI of 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Alle <Tarun.Alle@microchip.com>
Please note that the merge window is open, which means that net-next is
currently closed. Thus, patches should be submitted as RFC.
> ---
> v3 -> v4
> - Added check to handle invalid samples.
> - Added macro for ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable).
>
> v2 -> v3
> - Replaced hard-coded values with ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable).
>
> v1 -> v2
> - Replaced hard-coded 200 with ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable).
Hmm. We've been through several iterations trying to clean this up
into something more easily readable, but I fear there'll be another
iteration.
Maybe the following would be nicer:
enum {
SQI_SAMPLES = 200,
/* Look at samples of the middle 60% */
SQI_INLIERS_NUM = SQI_SAMPLES * 60 / 100,
SQI_INLIERS_START = (SQI_SAMPLES - SQI_INLIERS_NUM) / 2,
SQI_INLIERS_END = SQI_INLIERS_START + SQI_INLIERS_NUM,
};
> +static int lan887x_get_sqi_100M(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> + u16 rawtable[200];
u16 rawtable[SQI_SAMPLES];
> + u32 sqiavg = 0;
> + u8 sqinum = 0;
> + int rc;
Since you use "i" multiple times, declare it at the beginning of the
function rather than in each for loop.
int i;
> +
> + /* Configuration of SQI 100M */
> + rc = phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
> + LAN887X_COEFF_PWR_DN_CONFIG_100,
> + LAN887X_COEFF_PWR_DN_CONFIG_100_V);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100,
> + LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100_V);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100);
> + if (rc != LAN887X_SQI_CONFIG_100_V)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + rc = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100,
> + LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100_EN,
> + LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100_EN);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + /* Required before reading register
> + * otherwise it will return high value
> + */
> + msleep(50);
> +
> + /* Link check before raw readings */
> + rc = genphy_c45_read_link(phydev);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (!phydev->link)
> + return -ENETDOWN;
> +
> + /* Get 200 SQI raw readings */
> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable); i++) {
for (i = 0; i < SQI_SAMPLES; i++) {
> + rc = phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
> + LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100,
> + LAN887X_POKE_PEEK_100_EN);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
> + LAN887X_SQI_MSE_100);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rawtable[i] = (u16)rc;
> + }
> +
> + /* Link check after raw readings */
> + rc = genphy_c45_read_link(phydev);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (!phydev->link)
> + return -ENETDOWN;
> +
> + /* Sort SQI raw readings in ascending order */
> + sort(rawtable, ARRAY_SIZE(rawtable), sizeof(u16), data_compare, NULL);
sort(rawtable, SQI_SAMPLES, sizeof(u16), data_compare, NULL);
Although renaming data_compare to sqi_compare would be even more
descriptive of what it's doing.
> +
> + /* Keep inliers and discard outliers */
> + for (int i = SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(5, rawtable);
> + i < SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(5, rawtable) * 4; i++)
for (i = SQI_INLIERS_START; i < SQI_INLIERS_END; i++)
> + sqiavg += rawtable[i];
> +
> + /* Handle invalid samples */
> + if (sqiavg != 0) {
> + /* Get SQI average */
> + sqiavg /= SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(5, rawtable) * 4 -
> + SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT(5, rawtable);
sqiavg /= SQI_INLIERS_NUM;
Overall, I think this is better rather than the SQI100M_SAMPLE_INIT()
macro... for which I'm not sure what the _INIT() bit actually means.
I think my suggestion has the advantage that it makes it clear what
these various calculations are doing, because the result of the
calculations is described in the enum name.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.