This drops page table entry address output from all pxd_ERROR() definitions
which now matches with other architectures. This also prevents build issues
while transitioning into pxdp_get() based page table entry accesses.
The mentioned build error is caused with changed macros pxd_ERROR() ends up
doing &pxdp_get(pxd) which does not make sense and generates "error: lvalue
required as unary '&' operand" warning.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 12 ++++++------
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
index dabafba957ea..e1fa4dd87753 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
@@ -10,14 +10,14 @@
*/
#define pte_ERROR(e) \
- pr_err("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%08lx%08lx)\n", \
- __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), (e).pte_high, (e).pte_low)
+ pr_err("%s:%d: bad pte (%08lx%08lx)\n", \
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, (e).pte_high, (e).pte_low)
#define pmd_ERROR(e) \
- pr_err("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016Lx)\n", \
- __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e))
+ pr_err("%s:%d: bad pmd (%016Lx)\n", \
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, pmd_val(e))
#define pgd_ERROR(e) \
- pr_err("%s:%d: bad pgd %p(%016Lx)\n", \
- __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pgd_val(e))
+ pr_err("%s:%d: bad pgd (%016Lx)\n", \
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, pgd_val(e))
#define pxx_xchg64(_pxx, _ptr, _val) ({ \
_pxx##val_t *_p = (_pxx##val_t *)_ptr; \
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
index 3c4407271d08..4e462c825cab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
@@ -32,24 +32,24 @@ extern void paging_init(void);
static inline void sync_initial_page_table(void) { }
#define pte_ERROR(e) \
- pr_err("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx)\n", \
- __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e))
+ pr_err("%s:%d: bad pte (%016lx)\n", \
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, pte_val(e))
#define pmd_ERROR(e) \
- pr_err("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx)\n", \
- __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e))
+ pr_err("%s:%d: bad pmd (%016lx)\n", \
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, pmd_val(e))
#define pud_ERROR(e) \
- pr_err("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx)\n", \
- __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pud_val(e))
+ pr_err("%s:%d: bad pud (%016lx)\n", \
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, pud_val(e))
#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS >= 5
#define p4d_ERROR(e) \
- pr_err("%s:%d: bad p4d %p(%016lx)\n", \
- __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), p4d_val(e))
+ pr_err("%s:%d: bad p4d (%016lx)\n", \
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, p4d_val(e))
#endif
#define pgd_ERROR(e) \
- pr_err("%s:%d: bad pgd %p(%016lx)\n", \
- __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pgd_val(e))
+ pr_err("%s:%d: bad pgd (%016lx)\n", \
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, pgd_val(e))
struct mm_struct;
--
2.25.1
On 17.09.24 09:31, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This drops page table entry address output from all pxd_ERROR() definitions > which now matches with other architectures. This also prevents build issues > while transitioning into pxdp_get() based page table entry accesses. > > The mentioned build error is caused with changed macros pxd_ERROR() ends up > doing &pxdp_get(pxd) which does not make sense and generates "error: lvalue > required as unary '&' operand" warning. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> > --- Not a big fan of all these "bad PTE" thingies ... Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
On 9/17/24 03:22, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Not a big fan of all these "bad PTE" thingies ... In general? Or not a big fan of the fact that every architecture has their own (mostly) copied-and-pasted set?
On 17.09.24 13:19, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 9/17/24 03:22, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Not a big fan of all these "bad PTE" thingies ... > > In general? In general, after I learned that pmd_bad() fires on perfectly fine pmd_large() entries, which makes things like pmd_none_or_clear_bad() absolutely dangerous to use in code where we could have THPs ... Consequently, we stopped using them in THP code, so what's the whole point of having them ... > > Or not a big fan of the fact that every architecture has their own > (mostly) copied-and-pasted set? Well, that most certainly as well :) -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
On 9/17/24 16:49, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 9/17/24 03:22, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Not a big fan of all these "bad PTE" thingies ... > > In general? > > Or not a big fan of the fact that every architecture has their own > (mostly) copied-and-pasted set? Right, these pxd_ERROR() have similar definitions across platforms, (often the exact same) something that could be converged into common generic ones instead.
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.