[PATCH] drm/panel: elida-kd35t133: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions

Tejas Vipin posted 1 patch 2 months, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c | 107 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
[PATCH] drm/panel: elida-kd35t133: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Tejas Vipin 2 months, 1 week ago
Changes the elida-kd35t133 panel to use multi style functions for
improved error handling.

Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c | 107 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
index 00791ea81e90..62abda9559e7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
@@ -50,55 +50,45 @@ static inline struct kd35t133 *panel_to_kd35t133(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	return container_of(panel, struct kd35t133, panel);
 }
 
-static int kd35t133_init_sequence(struct kd35t133 *ctx)
+static void kd35t133_init_sequence(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *dsi_ctx)
 {
-	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
-	struct device *dev = ctx->dev;
-
 	/*
 	 * Init sequence was supplied by the panel vendor with minimal
 	 * documentation.
 	 */
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_POSITIVEGAMMA,
-			       0x00, 0x13, 0x18, 0x04, 0x0f, 0x06, 0x3a, 0x56,
-			       0x4d, 0x03, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x30, 0x3e, 0x0f);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_NEGATIVEGAMMA,
-			       0x00, 0x13, 0x18, 0x01, 0x11, 0x06, 0x38, 0x34,
-			       0x4d, 0x06, 0x0d, 0x0b, 0x31, 0x37, 0x0f);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_POWERCONTROL1, 0x18, 0x17);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_POWERCONTROL2, 0x41);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_VCOMCONTROL, 0x00, 0x1a, 0x80);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MIPI_DCS_SET_ADDRESS_MODE, 0x48);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MIPI_DCS_SET_PIXEL_FORMAT, 0x55);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_INTERFACEMODECTRL, 0x00);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_FRAMERATECTRL, 0xa0);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_DISPLAYINVERSIONCTRL, 0x02);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_DISPLAYFUNCTIONCTRL,
-			       0x20, 0x02);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_SETIMAGEFUNCTION, 0x00);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_ADJUSTCONTROL3,
-			       0xa9, 0x51, 0x2c, 0x82);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi, MIPI_DCS_ENTER_INVERT_MODE, NULL, 0);
-
-	dev_dbg(dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
-	return 0;
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_POSITIVEGAMMA,
+				     0x00, 0x13, 0x18, 0x04, 0x0f, 0x06, 0x3a, 0x56,
+				     0x4d, 0x03, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x30, 0x3e, 0x0f);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_NEGATIVEGAMMA,
+				     0x13, 0x18, 0x01, 0x11, 0x06, 0x38, 0x34,
+				     0x06, 0x0d, 0x0b, 0x31, 0x37, 0x0f);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_POWERCONTROL1, 0x18, 0x17);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_POWERCONTROL2, 0x41);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_VCOMCONTROL, 0x00, 0x1a, 0x80);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, MIPI_DCS_SET_ADDRESS_MODE, 0x48);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, MIPI_DCS_SET_PIXEL_FORMAT, 0x55);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_INTERFACEMODECTRL, 0x00);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_FRAMERATECTRL, 0xa0);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_DISPLAYINVERSIONCTRL, 0x02);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_DISPLAYFUNCTIONCTRL,
+				     0x02);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_SETIMAGEFUNCTION, 0x00);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_ADJUSTCONTROL3,
+				     0x51, 0x2c, 0x82);
+	if (!dsi_ctx->accum_err)
+		mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi_ctx->dsi, MIPI_DCS_ENTER_INVERT_MODE, NULL, 0);
 }
 
 static int kd35t133_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 {
 	struct kd35t133 *ctx = panel_to_kd35t133(panel);
 	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
-	int ret;
+	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
 
-	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to set display off: %d\n", ret);
-
-	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off_multi(&dsi_ctx);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
+	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err)
+		return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
 
 	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
 
@@ -112,18 +102,20 @@ static int kd35t133_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 {
 	struct kd35t133 *ctx = panel_to_kd35t133(panel);
 	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
-	int ret;
+	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
 
 	dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Resetting the panel\n");
-	ret = regulator_enable(ctx->vdd);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vdd supply: %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
+	dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->vdd);
+	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
+		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vdd supply: %d\n",
+			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
+		return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
 	}
 
-	ret = regulator_enable(ctx->iovcc);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable iovcc supply: %d\n", ret);
+	dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->iovcc);
+	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
+		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable iovcc supply: %d\n",
+			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
 		goto disable_vdd;
 	}
 
@@ -135,25 +127,16 @@ static int kd35t133_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 
 	msleep(20);
 
-	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_iovcc;
-	}
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
+	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 250);
 
-	msleep(250);
+	kd35t133_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
+	if (!dsi_ctx.accum_err)
+		dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
 
-	ret = kd35t133_init_sequence(ctx);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on_multi(&dsi_ctx);
+	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err)
 		goto disable_iovcc;
-	}
-
-	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to set display on: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_iovcc;
-	}
 
 	msleep(50);
 
@@ -163,7 +146,7 @@ static int kd35t133_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	regulator_disable(ctx->iovcc);
 disable_vdd:
 	regulator_disable(ctx->vdd);
-	return ret;
+	return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
 }
 
 static const struct drm_display_mode default_mode = {
-- 
2.46.0
Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: elida-kd35t133: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 2 months, 1 week ago
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 12:47:10PM GMT, Tejas Vipin wrote:
> Changes the elida-kd35t133 panel to use multi style functions for
> improved error handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c | 107 ++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
> index 00791ea81e90..62abda9559e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
> @@ -50,55 +50,45 @@ static inline struct kd35t133 *panel_to_kd35t133(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  	return container_of(panel, struct kd35t133, panel);
>  }
>  
> -static int kd35t133_init_sequence(struct kd35t133 *ctx)
> +static void kd35t133_init_sequence(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *dsi_ctx)
>  {
> -	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> -	struct device *dev = ctx->dev;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Init sequence was supplied by the panel vendor with minimal
>  	 * documentation.
>  	 */
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_POSITIVEGAMMA,
> -			       0x00, 0x13, 0x18, 0x04, 0x0f, 0x06, 0x3a, 0x56,
> -			       0x4d, 0x03, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x30, 0x3e, 0x0f);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_NEGATIVEGAMMA,
> -			       0x00, 0x13, 0x18, 0x01, 0x11, 0x06, 0x38, 0x34,
> -			       0x4d, 0x06, 0x0d, 0x0b, 0x31, 0x37, 0x0f);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_POWERCONTROL1, 0x18, 0x17);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_POWERCONTROL2, 0x41);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_VCOMCONTROL, 0x00, 0x1a, 0x80);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MIPI_DCS_SET_ADDRESS_MODE, 0x48);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, MIPI_DCS_SET_PIXEL_FORMAT, 0x55);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_INTERFACEMODECTRL, 0x00);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_FRAMERATECTRL, 0xa0);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_DISPLAYINVERSIONCTRL, 0x02);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_DISPLAYFUNCTIONCTRL,
> -			       0x20, 0x02);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_SETIMAGEFUNCTION, 0x00);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, KD35T133_CMD_ADJUSTCONTROL3,
> -			       0xa9, 0x51, 0x2c, 0x82);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi, MIPI_DCS_ENTER_INVERT_MODE, NULL, 0);
> -
> -	dev_dbg(dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
> -	return 0;
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_POSITIVEGAMMA,
> +				     0x00, 0x13, 0x18, 0x04, 0x0f, 0x06, 0x3a, 0x56,
> +				     0x4d, 0x03, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x30, 0x3e, 0x0f);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_NEGATIVEGAMMA,
> +				     0x13, 0x18, 0x01, 0x11, 0x06, 0x38, 0x34,
> +				     0x06, 0x0d, 0x0b, 0x31, 0x37, 0x0f);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_POWERCONTROL1, 0x18, 0x17);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_POWERCONTROL2, 0x41);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_VCOMCONTROL, 0x00, 0x1a, 0x80);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, MIPI_DCS_SET_ADDRESS_MODE, 0x48);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, MIPI_DCS_SET_PIXEL_FORMAT, 0x55);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_INTERFACEMODECTRL, 0x00);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_FRAMERATECTRL, 0xa0);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_DISPLAYINVERSIONCTRL, 0x02);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_DISPLAYFUNCTIONCTRL,
> +				     0x02);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_SETIMAGEFUNCTION, 0x00);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, KD35T133_CMD_ADJUSTCONTROL3,
> +				     0x51, 0x2c, 0x82);
> +	if (!dsi_ctx->accum_err)
> +		mipi_dsi_dcs_write(dsi_ctx->dsi, MIPI_DCS_ENTER_INVERT_MODE, NULL, 0);

Please use mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_multi() instead.

>  }
>  
>  static int kd35t133_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  {
>  	struct kd35t133 *ctx = panel_to_kd35t133(panel);
>  	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> -	int ret;
> +	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
>  
> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to set display off: %d\n", ret);
> -
> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err)
> +		return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
>  
>  	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
>  
> @@ -112,18 +102,20 @@ static int kd35t133_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  {
>  	struct kd35t133 *ctx = panel_to_kd35t133(panel);
>  	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> -	int ret;
> +	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
>  
>  	dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Resetting the panel\n");
> -	ret = regulator_enable(ctx->vdd);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vdd supply: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +	dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->vdd);
> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
> +		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vdd supply: %d\n",
> +			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
> +		return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = regulator_enable(ctx->iovcc);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable iovcc supply: %d\n", ret);
> +	dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->iovcc);
> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
> +		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable iovcc supply: %d\n",
> +			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
>  		goto disable_vdd;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -135,25 +127,16 @@ static int kd35t133_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  
>  	msleep(20);
>  
> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> -		goto disable_iovcc;
> -	}
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> +	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 250);
>  
> -	msleep(250);
> +	kd35t133_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
> +	if (!dsi_ctx.accum_err)
> +		dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
>  
> -	ret = kd35t133_init_sequence(ctx);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err)
>  		goto disable_iovcc;
> -	}

Move this after the last mipi_dsi_msleep(), merge with the error
handling.

> -
> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to set display on: %d\n", ret);
> -		goto disable_iovcc;
> -	}
>  
>  	msleep(50);

mipi_dsi_msleep()

>  
> @@ -163,7 +146,7 @@ static int kd35t133_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  	regulator_disable(ctx->iovcc);
>  disable_vdd:
>  	regulator_disable(ctx->vdd);
> -	return ret;
> +	return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct drm_display_mode default_mode = {
> -- 
> 2.46.0
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: elida-kd35t133: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Tejas Vipin 2 months, 1 week ago

On 9/20/24 9:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 12:47:10PM GMT, Tejas Vipin wrote:
>> Changes the elida-kd35t133 panel to use multi style functions for
>> improved error handling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c | 107 ++++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
>> index 00791ea81e90..62abda9559e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
>> @@ -135,25 +127,16 @@ static int kd35t133_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>>  
>>  	msleep(20);
>>  
>> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
>> -	if (ret < 0) {
>> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
>> -		goto disable_iovcc;
>> -	}
>> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
>> +	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 250);
>>  
>> -	msleep(250);
>> +	kd35t133_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
>> +	if (!dsi_ctx.accum_err)
>> +		dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
>>  
>> -	ret = kd35t133_init_sequence(ctx);
>> -	if (ret < 0) {
>> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on_multi(&dsi_ctx);
>> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err)
>>  		goto disable_iovcc;
>> -	}
> 
> Move this after the last mipi_dsi_msleep(), merge with the error
> handling.
> 
>> -
>> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
>> -	if (ret < 0) {
>> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to set display on: %d\n", ret);
>> -		goto disable_iovcc;
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	msleep(50);
> 
> mipi_dsi_msleep()

Is this necessary though? Converting this msleep to mipi_dsi_msleep and
moving the previous dsi_ctx.accum_err check to below this seems
redundant. If the check is placed above msleep, then we need to only
check for the error once. If its placed below mipi_dsi_msleep, we end up
checking for the error twice (once as written in the code, once in the
code generated by the macro) which is unnecessary.

-- 
Tejas Vipin
Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: elida-kd35t133: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 2 months, 1 week ago
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 11:49:49AM GMT, Tejas Vipin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/20/24 9:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 12:47:10PM GMT, Tejas Vipin wrote:
> >> Changes the elida-kd35t133 panel to use multi style functions for
> >> improved error handling.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c | 107 ++++++++-----------
> >>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
> >> index 00791ea81e90..62abda9559e7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-elida-kd35t133.c
> >> @@ -135,25 +127,16 @@ static int kd35t133_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> >>  
> >>  	msleep(20);
> >>  
> >> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
> >> -	if (ret < 0) {
> >> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> >> -		goto disable_iovcc;
> >> -	}
> >> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> >> +	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 250);
> >>  
> >> -	msleep(250);
> >> +	kd35t133_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
> >> +	if (!dsi_ctx.accum_err)
> >> +		dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
> >>  
> >> -	ret = kd35t133_init_sequence(ctx);
> >> -	if (ret < 0) {
> >> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
> >> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> >> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err)
> >>  		goto disable_iovcc;
> >> -	}
> > 
> > Move this after the last mipi_dsi_msleep(), merge with the error
> > handling.
> > 
> >> -
> >> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
> >> -	if (ret < 0) {
> >> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to set display on: %d\n", ret);
> >> -		goto disable_iovcc;
> >> -	}
> >>  
> >>  	msleep(50);
> > 
> > mipi_dsi_msleep()
> 
> Is this necessary though? Converting this msleep to mipi_dsi_msleep and
> moving the previous dsi_ctx.accum_err check to below this seems
> redundant. If the check is placed above msleep, then we need to only
> check for the error once. If its placed below mipi_dsi_msleep, we end up
> checking for the error twice (once as written in the code, once in the
> code generated by the macro) which is unnecessary.

Yes, uniformity. And the compiler will most likely optimize things away.

> 
> -- 
> Tejas Vipin

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry