kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
After the commit 29c1c24a2707 ("function_graph: Fix up ftrace_graph_ret_addr()")
ftrace_graph_ret_addr() doesn't need to initialize "int i" at the start.
While at it, move the declaration of "ret_stack" into the main loop.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
index d7d4fb403f6f..d45a8bc97997 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
@@ -890,9 +890,8 @@ ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(struct task_struct *task, int idx)
unsigned long ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx,
unsigned long ret, unsigned long *retp)
{
- struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
unsigned long return_handler = (unsigned long)dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(return_to_handler);
- int i = task->curr_ret_stack;
+ int i;
if (ret != return_handler)
return ret;
@@ -902,7 +901,7 @@ unsigned long ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx,
i = *idx ? : task->curr_ret_stack;
while (i > 0) {
- ret_stack = get_ret_stack(task, i, &i);
+ struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack = get_ret_stack(task, i, &i);
if (!ret_stack)
break;
/*
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:56:43 +0200 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > After the commit 29c1c24a2707 ("function_graph: Fix up ftrace_graph_ret_addr()") > ftrace_graph_ret_addr() doesn't need to initialize "int i" at the start. > > While at it, move the declaration of "ret_stack" into the main loop. Should not make two changes like this, because it risks the entire patch being denied. > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> > --- > kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c > index d7d4fb403f6f..d45a8bc97997 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c > @@ -890,9 +890,8 @@ ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(struct task_struct *task, int idx) > unsigned long ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx, > unsigned long ret, unsigned long *retp) > { > - struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack; > unsigned long return_handler = (unsigned long)dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(return_to_handler); > - int i = task->curr_ret_stack; > + int i; I'm fine with removing the unneeded init of i. > > if (ret != return_handler) > return ret; > @@ -902,7 +901,7 @@ unsigned long ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx, > > i = *idx ? : task->curr_ret_stack; > while (i > 0) { > - ret_stack = get_ret_stack(task, i, &i); > + struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack = get_ret_stack(task, i, &i); This is just a preference. Sometimes I like the declaration up on top, sometimes in the block it used. But this case, I wont it at top. Please make a v2 with just the change to i. -- Steve > if (!ret_stack) > break; > /*
After the commit 29c1c24a2707 ("function_graph: Fix up ftrace_graph_ret_addr()")
ftrace_graph_ret_addr() doesn't need to initialize "int i" at the start.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
index d7d4fb403f6f..45c02bf18304 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ unsigned long ftrace_graph_ret_addr(struct task_struct *task, int *idx,
{
struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
unsigned long return_handler = (unsigned long)dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(return_to_handler);
- int i = task->curr_ret_stack;
+ int i;
if (ret != return_handler)
return ret;
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.