[RFC PATCH v3 1/3] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure for dynamic CPU isolation

Costa Shulyupin posted 3 patches 2 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[RFC PATCH v3 1/3] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure for dynamic CPU isolation
Posted by Costa Shulyupin 2 months, 2 weeks ago
Introduce infrastructure function housekeeping_update() to change
housekeeping_cpumask during runtime and adjust configurations of depended
subsystems.

Configuration adjustments of subsystems follow in subsequent patches.

Parent patch:
sched/isolation: Exclude dynamically isolated CPUs from housekeeping masks
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240821142312.236970-1-longman@redhat.com/

Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>

---
Changes in v2:
- remove unnecessary `err` variable
- add for_each_clear_bit... to clear isolated CPUs
- Address Gleixner's comments:
- use WRITE_ONCE to change housekeeping.flags
- use `struct cpumask *update` in signature of housekeeping_update

v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240516190437.3545310-2-costa.shul@redhat.com/
---
 kernel/sched/isolation.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 3018ba81eb65d..3f24921b929a0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -124,6 +124,36 @@ static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
 		     housekeeping_staging);
 }
 
+/*
+ * housekeeping_update - change housekeeping.cpumasks[type] and propagate the
+ * change.
+ */
+static int housekeeping_update(enum hk_type type, const struct cpumask *update)
+{
+	struct {
+		struct cpumask changed;
+		struct cpumask enable;
+		struct cpumask disable;
+	} *masks;
+
+	masks = kmalloc(sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!masks)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+	cpumask_xor(&masks->changed, housekeeping_cpumask(type), update);
+	cpumask_and(&masks->enable, &masks->changed, update);
+	cpumask_andnot(&masks->disable, &masks->changed, update);
+	cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], update);
+	WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, housekeeping.flags | BIT(type));
+	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
+		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
+
+	kfree(masks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	cpumask_var_t non_housekeeping_mask, housekeeping_staging;
@@ -327,8 +357,11 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
 		/*
 		 * Reset housekeeping to bootup default
 		 */
+
+		for_each_clear_bit(type, &boot_hk_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
+			housekeeping_update(type, cpu_possible_mask);
 		for_each_set_bit(type, &boot_hk_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
-			cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], boot_hk_cpumask);
+			housekeeping_update(type, boot_hk_cpumask);
 
 		WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, boot_hk_flags);
 		if (!boot_hk_flags && static_key_enabled(&housekeeping_overridden))
@@ -355,9 +388,8 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
 		cpumask_andnot(tmp_mask, src_mask, isolcpus);
 		if (!cpumask_intersects(tmp_mask, cpu_online_mask))
 			return -EINVAL;	/* Invalid isolated CPUs */
-		cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], tmp_mask);
+		housekeeping_update(type, tmp_mask);
 	}
-	WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, boot_hk_flags | flags);
 	excluded = true;
 	if (!static_key_enabled(&housekeeping_overridden))
 		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
-- 
2.45.0
Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure for dynamic CPU isolation
Posted by Thomas Gleixner 1 month, 4 weeks ago
On Mon, Sep 16 2024 at 15:20, Costa Shulyupin wrote:
> +/*
> + * housekeeping_update - change housekeeping.cpumasks[type] and propagate the
> + * change.
> + */
> +static int housekeeping_update(enum hk_type type, const struct cpumask *update)
> +{
> +	struct {
> +		struct cpumask changed;
> +		struct cpumask enable;
> +		struct cpumask disable;
> +	} *masks;
> +
> +	masks = kmalloc(sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!masks)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
> +	cpumask_xor(&masks->changed, housekeeping_cpumask(type), update);
> +	cpumask_and(&masks->enable, &masks->changed, update);
> +	cpumask_andnot(&masks->disable, &masks->changed, update);
> +	cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], update);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, housekeeping.flags | BIT(type));

So this sets the bit for the type

> +	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
> +		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);

What's the point of doing this on every iteration?

> +	kfree(masks);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
>  {
>  	cpumask_var_t non_housekeeping_mask, housekeeping_staging;
> @@ -327,8 +357,11 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
>  		/*
>  		 * Reset housekeeping to bootup default
>  		 */
> +
> +		for_each_clear_bit(type, &boot_hk_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
> +			housekeeping_update(type, cpu_possible_mask);

Even for those which are clear

>  		for_each_set_bit(type, &boot_hk_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
> -			cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], boot_hk_cpumask);
> +			housekeeping_update(type, boot_hk_cpumask);
>  
>  		WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, boot_hk_flags);

Just to overwrite them with boot_hk_flags afterwards. That does not make
any sense at all.

Thanks,

        tglx