.../bindings/clock/microchip,lan966x-gck.yaml | 13 +++- drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Add support for the lan969x SoC clock driver in the existing lan966x
driver. The lan969x clock controller contains 3 PLLs - cpu_clk, ddr_clk
and sys_clk which generates and supplies the clock to various
peripherals within the SoC.
Patch #1 adds compatible strings for lan969x SKU's in the dt-bindings
Patch #2 makes the clk_names var const char * const
Patch #3 prepares the lan966x driver for lan969x, by adding private
match data.
Patch #4 adds support for lan969x
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
---
Daniel Machon (4):
dt-bindings: clock: add support for lan969x
clk: lan966x: make clk_names const char * const
clk: lan966x: prepare driver for lan969x support
clk: lan966x: add support for lan969x SoC clock driver
.../bindings/clock/microchip,lan966x-gck.yaml | 13 +++-
drivers/clk/clk-lan966x.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 3cfb5aa10cb78571e214e48a3a6e42c11d5288a1
change-id: 20240912-lan969x-clock-ac4bc920869c
Best regards,
--
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
On 16.09.2024 12:49, Daniel Machon wrote: > Daniel Machon (4): > dt-bindings: clock: add support for lan969x > clk: lan966x: make clk_names const char * const > clk: lan966x: prepare driver for lan969x support > clk: lan966x: add support for lan969x SoC clock driver Applied to clk-microchip, thanks!
Quoting Daniel Machon (2024-09-16 02:49:18) > Add support for the lan969x SoC clock driver in the existing lan966x > driver. The lan969x clock controller contains 3 PLLs - cpu_clk, ddr_clk > and sys_clk which generates and supplies the clock to various > peripherals within the SoC. > > Patch #1 adds compatible strings for lan969x SKU's in the dt-bindings > > Patch #2 makes the clk_names var const char * const > > Patch #3 prepares the lan966x driver for lan969x, by adding private > match data. > > Patch #4 adds support for lan969x > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> Am I supposed to pick up microchip clk patches myself this time?
On 18.10.2024 01:59, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Daniel Machon (2024-09-16 02:49:18) >> Add support for the lan969x SoC clock driver in the existing lan966x >> driver. The lan969x clock controller contains 3 PLLs - cpu_clk, ddr_clk >> and sys_clk which generates and supplies the clock to various >> peripherals within the SoC. >> >> Patch #1 adds compatible strings for lan969x SKU's in the dt-bindings >> >> Patch #2 makes the clk_names var const char * const >> >> Patch #3 prepares the lan966x driver for lan969x, by adding private >> match data. >> >> Patch #4 adds support for lan969x >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> > > Am I supposed to pick up microchip clk patches myself this time? It's on my track. I already have it on my local queue for a while. Sorry for not mentioning it yet. I need to run some tests. Thank you, Claudiu >
Quoting claudiu beznea (2024-10-18 01:34:16) > > > On 18.10.2024 01:59, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Daniel Machon (2024-09-16 02:49:18) > >> Add support for the lan969x SoC clock driver in the existing lan966x > >> driver. The lan969x clock controller contains 3 PLLs - cpu_clk, ddr_clk > >> and sys_clk which generates and supplies the clock to various > >> peripherals within the SoC. > >> > >> Patch #1 adds compatible strings for lan969x SKU's in the dt-bindings > >> > >> Patch #2 makes the clk_names var const char * const > >> > >> Patch #3 prepares the lan966x driver for lan969x, by adding private > >> match data. > >> > >> Patch #4 adds support for lan969x > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> > > > > Am I supposed to pick up microchip clk patches myself this time? > > It's on my track. I already have it on my local queue for a while. Sorry > for not mentioning it yet. I need to run some tests. > Cool. Thanks for taking care of it!
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.