Fix typos in comments.

Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c | 2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c         | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
index 1477db7f5307..4336ac98d85d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ irq_pool_request_irq(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, struct irq_affinity_desc *af_de
  * isn't subset of req_mask, so we will skip it. irq1_mask is subset of req_mask,
  * we don't skip it.
  * If pool is sf_ctrl_pool, then all IRQs have the same mask, so any IRQ will
- * fit. And since mask is subset of itself, we will pass the first if bellow.
+ * fit. And since mask is subset of itself, we will pass the first if below.
  */
 static struct mlx5_irq *
 irq_pool_find_least_loaded(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, const struct cpumask *req_mask)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
index c6e951b8ebdb..a6bf3f975d52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
@@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@ void mlx5_unload_one(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, bool suspend)
 	devl_unlock(devlink);
 }
 
-/* In case of light probe, we don't need a full query of hca_caps, but only the bellow caps.
+/* In case of light probe, we don't need a full query of hca_caps, but only the below caps.
  * A full query of hca_caps will be done when the device will reload.
  */
 static int mlx5_query_hca_caps_light(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
-- 
2.39.5

On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 02:42:25PM +0300, Andrew Kreimer wrote:
> Fix typos in comments.
> 
> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>

Hi Andrew,

These changes look good to me.

However, the patch was posted while net-next was closed for the v6.12 merge
window. And, I assume because of that, it has been marked as deferred in
Patchwork.

In the meantime, net-next has reopened, so could you consider reposting
your patch. If you do so please mark it as v2 or repost of something like
that. And please include the target tree, net-next, in the subject.

  Subject [PATCH net-next repost] ...

For reference, Netdev processes are documented here:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html

...

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 02:48:11PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 02:42:25PM +0300, Andrew Kreimer wrote:
> > Fix typos in comments.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
> 
> In the meantime, net-next has reopened, so could you consider reposting
> your patch. If you do so please mark it as v2 or repost of something like
> that. And please include the target tree, net-next, in the subject.
> 
Thank you, on it.