drivers/vhost/net.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The specification says the device MUST set num_buffers to 1 if
VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF has not been negotiated.
Fixes: 41e3e42108bc ("vhost/net: enable virtio 1.0")
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index f16279351db5..d4d97fa9cc8f 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -1107,6 +1107,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
size_t vhost_hlen, sock_hlen;
size_t vhost_len, sock_len;
bool busyloop_intr = false;
+ bool set_num_buffers;
struct socket *sock;
struct iov_iter fixup;
__virtio16 num_buffers;
@@ -1129,6 +1130,8 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
vq_log = unlikely(vhost_has_feature(vq, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) ?
vq->log : NULL;
mergeable = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF);
+ set_num_buffers = mergeable ||
+ vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
do {
sock_len = vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(net, sock->sk,
@@ -1205,7 +1208,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
/* TODO: Should check and handle checksum. */
num_buffers = cpu_to_vhost16(vq, headcount);
- if (likely(mergeable) &&
+ if (likely(set_num_buffers) &&
copy_to_iter(&num_buffers, sizeof num_buffers,
&fixup) != sizeof num_buffers) {
vq_err(vq, "Failed num_buffers write");
---
base-commit: 46a0057a5853cbdb58211c19e89ba7777dc6fd50
change-id: 20240908-v1-90fc83ff8b09
Best regards,
--
Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 10:35:53AM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote: > The specification says the device MUST set num_buffers to 1 if > VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF has not been negotiated. > > Fixes: 41e3e42108bc ("vhost/net: enable virtio 1.0") > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> True, this is out of spec. But, qemu is also out of spec :( Given how many years this was out there, I wonder whether we should just fix the spec, instead of changing now. Jason, what's your take? > --- > drivers/vhost/net.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c > index f16279351db5..d4d97fa9cc8f 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c > @@ -1107,6 +1107,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net) > size_t vhost_hlen, sock_hlen; > size_t vhost_len, sock_len; > bool busyloop_intr = false; > + bool set_num_buffers; > struct socket *sock; > struct iov_iter fixup; > __virtio16 num_buffers; > @@ -1129,6 +1130,8 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net) > vq_log = unlikely(vhost_has_feature(vq, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) ? > vq->log : NULL; > mergeable = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF); > + set_num_buffers = mergeable || > + vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1); > > do { > sock_len = vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(net, sock->sk, > @@ -1205,7 +1208,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net) > /* TODO: Should check and handle checksum. */ > > num_buffers = cpu_to_vhost16(vq, headcount); > - if (likely(mergeable) && > + if (likely(set_num_buffers) && > copy_to_iter(&num_buffers, sizeof num_buffers, > &fixup) != sizeof num_buffers) { > vq_err(vq, "Failed num_buffers write"); > > --- > base-commit: 46a0057a5853cbdb58211c19e89ba7777dc6fd50 > change-id: 20240908-v1-90fc83ff8b09 > > Best regards, > -- > Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 4:54 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 10:35:53AM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote: > > The specification says the device MUST set num_buffers to 1 if > > VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF has not been negotiated. > > > > Fixes: 41e3e42108bc ("vhost/net: enable virtio 1.0") > > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> > > True, this is out of spec. But, qemu is also out of spec :( > > Given how many years this was out there, I wonder whether > we should just fix the spec, instead of changing now. > > Jason, what's your take? Fixing the spec (if you mean release the requirement) seems to be less risky. Thanks > > > > --- > > drivers/vhost/net.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c > > index f16279351db5..d4d97fa9cc8f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c > > @@ -1107,6 +1107,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net) > > size_t vhost_hlen, sock_hlen; > > size_t vhost_len, sock_len; > > bool busyloop_intr = false; > > + bool set_num_buffers; > > struct socket *sock; > > struct iov_iter fixup; > > __virtio16 num_buffers; > > @@ -1129,6 +1130,8 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net) > > vq_log = unlikely(vhost_has_feature(vq, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) ? > > vq->log : NULL; > > mergeable = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF); > > + set_num_buffers = mergeable || > > + vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1); > > > > do { > > sock_len = vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(net, sock->sk, > > @@ -1205,7 +1208,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net) > > /* TODO: Should check and handle checksum. */ > > > > num_buffers = cpu_to_vhost16(vq, headcount); > > - if (likely(mergeable) && > > + if (likely(set_num_buffers) && > > copy_to_iter(&num_buffers, sizeof num_buffers, > > &fixup) != sizeof num_buffers) { > > vq_err(vq, "Failed num_buffers write"); > > > > --- > > base-commit: 46a0057a5853cbdb58211c19e89ba7777dc6fd50 > > change-id: 20240908-v1-90fc83ff8b09 > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> >
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.