[RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i

Min-Hua Chen posted 1 patch 2 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile                 | 4 ++--
.../python/{raw_pylibcpupower.i => raw_pylibcpupower.if}      | 0
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/{raw_pylibcpupower.i => raw_pylibcpupower.if} (100%)
[RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i
Posted by Min-Hua Chen 2 months, 2 weeks ago
This RFC patch is actually bug report. All *.i file will be
removed by 'make mrproper', including raw_pylibcpupower.i, added
by commit: 338f490e07bc ("pm:cpupower: Add SWIG bindings files for libcpupower")

We can reproduce the error by performing the following command:
cd linux-next
make mrproper
cd tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python
make

We will get an error message:
make: *** No rule to make target 'raw_pylibcpupower.i', needed by 'raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c'.  Stop.

Renaming the raw_pylibcpupower.i is just a workaround to fix the
issue above.

Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <minhuadotchen@gmail.com>
---
 tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile                 | 4 ++--
 .../python/{raw_pylibcpupower.i => raw_pylibcpupower.if}      | 0
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 rename tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/{raw_pylibcpupower.i => raw_pylibcpupower.if} (100%)

diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile b/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile
index dc09c5b66ead..de872a1b80d3 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile
@@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ _raw_pylibcpupower.so: raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.o
 raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.o: raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c
 	$(CC) -fPIC -c raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c $(PY_INCLUDE)
 
-raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c: raw_pylibcpupower.i
+raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c: raw_pylibcpupower.if
 ifeq ($(HAVE_SWIG),0)
 	$(error "swig was not found. Make sure you have it installed and in the PATH to generate the bindings.")
 else ifeq ($(HAVE_PYCONFIG),0)
 	$(error "python-config was not found. Make sure you have it installed and in the PATH to generate the bindings.")
 endif
-	swig -python raw_pylibcpupower.i
+	swig -python raw_pylibcpupower.if
 
 # Will only clean the bindings folder; will not clean the actual cpupower folder
 clean:
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/raw_pylibcpupower.i b/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/raw_pylibcpupower.if
similarity index 100%
rename from tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/raw_pylibcpupower.i
rename to tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/raw_pylibcpupower.if
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i
Posted by Shuah Khan 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On 9/12/24 06:50, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> This RFC patch is actually bug report. All *.i file will be
> removed by 'make mrproper', including raw_pylibcpupower.i, added
> by commit: 338f490e07bc ("pm:cpupower: Add SWIG bindings files for libcpupower")
> 
> We can reproduce the error by performing the following command:
> cd linux-next
> make mrproper
> cd tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python
> make
> 
> We will get an error message:
> make: *** No rule to make target 'raw_pylibcpupower.i', needed by 'raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c'.  Stop.
> 
> Renaming the raw_pylibcpupower.i is just a workaround to fix the
> issue above.

I need a non-rfc patch for this. Please send a proper patch
I can pull in once John has a chance to review this.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <minhuadotchen@gmail.com>
> ---
>   tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile                 | 4 ++--
>   .../python/{raw_pylibcpupower.i => raw_pylibcpupower.if}      | 0
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>   rename tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/{raw_pylibcpupower.i => raw_pylibcpupower.if} (100%)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile b/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile
> index dc09c5b66ead..de872a1b80d3 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/Makefile
> @@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ _raw_pylibcpupower.so: raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.o
>   raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.o: raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c
>   	$(CC) -fPIC -c raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c $(PY_INCLUDE)
>   
> -raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c: raw_pylibcpupower.i
> +raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c: raw_pylibcpupower.if
>   ifeq ($(HAVE_SWIG),0)
>   	$(error "swig was not found. Make sure you have it installed and in the PATH to generate the bindings.")
>   else ifeq ($(HAVE_PYCONFIG),0)
>   	$(error "python-config was not found. Make sure you have it installed and in the PATH to generate the bindings.")
>   endif
> -	swig -python raw_pylibcpupower.i
> +	swig -python raw_pylibcpupower.if
>   
>   # Will only clean the bindings folder; will not clean the actual cpupower folder
>   clean:
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/raw_pylibcpupower.i b/tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/raw_pylibcpupower.if
> similarity index 100%
> rename from tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/raw_pylibcpupower.i
> rename to tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python/raw_pylibcpupower.if

thanks,
-- Shuah
Re: [RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i
Posted by John B. Wyatt IV 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:31:19AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/12/24 06:50, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> > This RFC patch is actually bug report. All *.i file will be
> > removed by 'make mrproper', including raw_pylibcpupower.i, added
> > by commit: 338f490e07bc ("pm:cpupower: Add SWIG bindings files for libcpupower")
> > 
> > We can reproduce the error by performing the following command:
> > cd linux-next
> > make mrproper
> > cd tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python
> > make
> > 
> > We will get an error message:
> > make: *** No rule to make target 'raw_pylibcpupower.i', needed by 'raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c'.  Stop.
> > 
> > Renaming the raw_pylibcpupower.i is just a workaround to fix the
> > issue above.
> 
> I need a non-rfc patch for this. Please send a proper patch
> I can pull in once John has a chance to review this.

I have reviewed and tested and this. I am good with it being a stopgap.

Please send the non-rfc patch.

Thank you for reporting and sending a patch for this Min-Hua.

Reviewed-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John B. Wyatt IV <sageofredondo@gmail.com>
Tested-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@redhat.com>
Tested-by: John B. Wyatt IV <sageofredondo@gmail.com>

-- 
Sincerely,
John Wyatt
Software Engineer, Core Kernel
Red Hat
Re: [RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i
Posted by Min-Hua Chen 2 months, 2 weeks ago
Hi,

>On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:31:19AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 9/12/24 06:50, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
>> > This RFC patch is actually bug report. All *.i file will be
>> > removed by 'make mrproper', including raw_pylibcpupower.i, added
>> > by commit: 338f490e07bc ("pm:cpupower: Add SWIG bindings files for libcpupower")
>> > 
>> > We can reproduce the error by performing the following command:
>> > cd linux-next
>> > make mrproper
>> > cd tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python
>> > make
>> > 
>> > We will get an error message:
>> > make: *** No rule to make target 'raw_pylibcpupower.i', needed by 'raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c'.  Stop.
>> > 
>> > Renaming the raw_pylibcpupower.i is just a workaround to fix the
>> > issue above.
>> 
>> I need a non-rfc patch for this. Please send a proper patch
>> I can pull in once John has a chance to review this.
>
>I have reviewed and tested and this. I am good with it being a stopgap.
>
>Please send the non-rfc patch.
>
>Thank you for reporting and sending a patch for this Min-Hua.
>
>Reviewed-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@redhat.com>
>Reviewed-by: John B. Wyatt IV <sageofredondo@gmail.com>
>Tested-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@redhat.com>
>Tested-by: John B. Wyatt IV <sageofredondo@gmail.com>

Thank you for reviewing this patch, I will submit a non-rfc patch later.

cheers,
Min-Hua
Re: [RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i
Posted by Shuah Khan 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On 9/12/24 11:36, John B. Wyatt IV wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:31:19AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 9/12/24 06:50, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
>>> This RFC patch is actually bug report. All *.i file will be
>>> removed by 'make mrproper', including raw_pylibcpupower.i, added
>>> by commit: 338f490e07bc ("pm:cpupower: Add SWIG bindings files for libcpupower")
>>>
>>> We can reproduce the error by performing the following command:
>>> cd linux-next
>>> make mrproper
>>> cd tools/power/cpupower/bindings/python
>>> make
>>>
>>> We will get an error message:
>>> make: *** No rule to make target 'raw_pylibcpupower.i', needed by 'raw_pylibcpupower_wrap.c'.  Stop.
>>>
>>> Renaming the raw_pylibcpupower.i is just a workaround to fix the
>>> issue above.
>>
>> I need a non-rfc patch for this. Please send a proper patch
>> I can pull in once John has a chance to review this.
> 

How and when is raw_pylibcpupower.i generated? This looks
like a pre-processor output.


> I have reviewed and tested and this. I am good with it being a stopgap.

I am okay with the stopgap, but I do want i explore other solutions.
> 
> Please send the non-rfc patch.
> 
> Thank you for reporting and sending a patch for this Min-Hua.
> 
> Reviewed-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: John B. Wyatt IV <sageofredondo@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: John B. Wyatt IV <sageofredondo@gmail.com>
> 

thanks,
-- Shuah
Re: [RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i
Posted by Min-Hua Chen 2 months, 2 weeks ago
AFAIK,
raw_pylibcpupower.i is not a generated file, it is a interface file
for swig.

The *.i file extension is also used for pre-processor output
(single target build) and all *.i files are removed by 'make mrproper',
including raw_pylibcpupower.i (should not be removed).


thanks,
Min-Hua
>
>
>> I have reviewed and tested and this. I am good with it being a stopgap.
>
>I am okay with the stopgap, but I do want i explore other solutions.
>> 
>> Please send the non-rfc patch.
>> 
>> Thank you for reporting and sending a patch for this Min-Hua.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: John B. Wyatt IV <sageofredondo@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: John B. Wyatt IV <sageofredondo@gmail.com>
>>
Re: [RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i
Posted by John B. Wyatt IV 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 06:55:19AM +0800, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> AFAIK,
> raw_pylibcpupower.i is not a generated file, it is a interface file
> for swig.

That is correct. You can do more advanced things to help SWIG handle
different languages, but so far with the script I wrote for libcpupower
simply copying the definition files as worked for me for the .i file.

See:
https://www.swig.org/Doc4.2/Preprocessor.html#Preprocessor

> The *.i file extension is also used for pre-processor output
> (single target build) and all *.i files are removed by 'make mrproper',
> including raw_pylibcpupower.i (should not be removed).

That would explain it. Not just 'make mrproper', but 'make clean'
in the root removes the file as well. 'make clean' in the tools
directory does not affect it.

From 'man gcc':

       file.i
           C source code that should not be preprocessed.

> >
> >> I have reviewed and tested and this. I am good with it being a stopgap.
> >
> >I am okay with the stopgap, but I do want i explore other solutions.

Reviewing the documentation a better solution would be to rename it to .swg

'''
5.1.1 Input format

As input, SWIG expects a file containing ISO C/C++ declarations and special
SWIG directives. More often than not, this is a special SWIG interface file
which is usually denoted with a special .i or .swg suffix.
'''

https://www.swig.org/Doc4.2/SWIG.html

-- 
Sincerely,
John Wyatt
Software Engineer, Core Kernel
Red Hat
Re: [RFC PATCH for-next] pm: cpupower: rename raw_pylibcpupower.i
Posted by Shuah Khan 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On 9/13/24 10:35, John B. Wyatt IV wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 06:55:19AM +0800, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
>> AFAIK,
>> raw_pylibcpupower.i is not a generated file, it is a interface file
>> for swig.
> 
> That is correct. You can do more advanced things to help SWIG handle
> different languages, but so far with the script I wrote for libcpupower
> simply copying the definition files as worked for me for the .i file.
> 
> See:
> https://www.swig.org/Doc4.2/Preprocessor.html#Preprocessor
> 
>> The *.i file extension is also used for pre-processor output
>> (single target build) and all *.i files are removed by 'make mrproper',
>> including raw_pylibcpupower.i (should not be removed).
> 
> That would explain it. Not just 'make mrproper', but 'make clean'
> in the root removes the file as well. 'make clean' in the tools
> directory does not affect it.
> 
>  From 'man gcc':
> 
>         file.i
>             C source code that should not be preprocessed.
> 

.i extension is used for a C pre-processor out, hence the need to
mrprpoer and clean remove it. Because of that reason, using .i
will not work for swig interface files.

We build files to debug problems and to check the pre-processor
output. So changing mrproper and cleans to not remove .i would
leave the tree dirty.

>>>
>>>> I have reviewed and tested and this. I am good with it being a stopgap.
>>>
>>> I am okay with the stopgap, but I do want i explore other solutions.
> 
> Reviewing the documentation a better solution would be to rename it to .swg
> 
> '''
> 5.1.1 Input format
> 
> As input, SWIG expects a file containing ISO C/C++ declarations and special
> SWIG directives. More often than not, this is a special SWIG interface file
> which is usually denoted with a special .i or .swg suffix.
> '''
> 

This is the reason why I wanted to understand the problem to come up
with a solutions than renaming the file with .if extension.

I am glad to hear .swg can be used. Let's fix this properly then by
renaming the file as raw_pylibcpupower

> https://www.swig.org/Doc4.2/SWIG.html
> 

Please send me patch with the change to rename using .swg extension
and this can be used going forward for other swg interface files.

thanks,
-- Shuah