[PATCH 19/24] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64() to use shadow_timekeeper

Anna-Maria Behnsen posted 24 patches 2 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 19/24] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64() to use shadow_timekeeper
Posted by Anna-Maria Behnsen 2 months, 2 weeks ago
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.

Convert timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64() to use this scheme.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 22 +++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 223429b1ca06..244bb58dcda9 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1893,22 +1893,14 @@ bool timekeeping_rtc_skipsuspend(void)
  */
 void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(const struct timespec64 *delta)
 {
-	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tk_core.lock, flags);
-	write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);
-
-	suspend_timing_needed = false;
-
-	timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
-
-	__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
-
-	timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_UPDATE_ALL | TK_MIRROR);
+	scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave, &tk_core.lock) {
+		struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.shadow_timekeeper;
 
-	write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
+		suspend_timing_needed = false;
+		timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
+		__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
+		timekeeping_update_staged(&tk_core, TK_UPDATE_ALL);
+	}
 
 	/* Signal hrtimers about time change */
 	clock_was_set(CLOCK_SET_WALL | CLOCK_SET_BOOT);

-- 
2.39.2