[PATCH v2 11/15] regulator: core: Use fsleep() to get best sleep mechanism

Anna-Maria Behnsen posted 15 patches 2 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 11/15] regulator: core: Use fsleep() to get best sleep mechanism
Posted by Anna-Maria Behnsen 2 months, 2 weeks ago
_regulator_delay_helper() implements the recommondation of the outdated
documentation which sleep mechanism should be used. There is already a
function in place which does everything and also maps to reality called
fsleep().

Use fsleep() directly.

Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
---
v2: Use fsleep() directly
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 47 ++++-------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 7674b7f2df14..5d4cfb14fada 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2667,45 +2667,6 @@ static int regulator_ena_gpio_ctrl(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/**
- * _regulator_delay_helper - a delay helper function
- * @delay: time to delay in microseconds
- *
- * Delay for the requested amount of time as per the guidelines in:
- *
- *     Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
- *
- * The assumption here is that these regulator operations will never used in
- * atomic context and therefore sleeping functions can be used.
- */
-static void _regulator_delay_helper(unsigned int delay)
-{
-	unsigned int ms = delay / 1000;
-	unsigned int us = delay % 1000;
-
-	if (ms > 0) {
-		/*
-		 * For small enough values, handle super-millisecond
-		 * delays in the usleep_range() call below.
-		 */
-		if (ms < 20)
-			us += ms * 1000;
-		else
-			msleep(ms);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Give the scheduler some room to coalesce with any other
-	 * wakeup sources. For delays shorter than 10 us, don't even
-	 * bother setting up high-resolution timers and just busy-
-	 * loop.
-	 */
-	if (us >= 10)
-		usleep_range(us, us + 100);
-	else
-		udelay(us);
-}
-
 /**
  * _regulator_check_status_enabled
  *
@@ -2760,7 +2721,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 		s64 remaining = ktime_us_delta(end, ktime_get_boottime());
 
 		if (remaining > 0)
-			_regulator_delay_helper(remaining);
+			fsleep(remaining);
 	}
 
 	if (rdev->ena_pin) {
@@ -2794,7 +2755,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 		int time_remaining = delay;
 
 		while (time_remaining > 0) {
-			_regulator_delay_helper(rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time);
+			fsleep(rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time);
 
 			if (rdev->desc->ops->get_status) {
 				ret = _regulator_check_status_enabled(rdev);
@@ -2813,7 +2774,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 			return -ETIMEDOUT;
 		}
 	} else {
-		_regulator_delay_helper(delay);
+		fsleep(delay);
 	}
 
 	trace_regulator_enable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
@@ -3741,7 +3702,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	}
 
 	/* Insert any necessary delays */
-	_regulator_delay_helper(delay);
+	fsleep(delay);
 
 	if (best_val >= 0) {
 		unsigned long data = best_val;

-- 
2.39.2
Re: [PATCH v2 11/15] regulator: core: Use fsleep() to get best sleep mechanism
Posted by Frederic Weisbecker 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Le Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 07:13:37AM +0200, Anna-Maria Behnsen a écrit :
> _regulator_delay_helper() implements the recommondation of the outdated
> documentation which sleep mechanism should be used. There is already a
> function in place which does everything and also maps to reality called
> fsleep().
> 
> Use fsleep() directly.
> 
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>