Accept another DID:VID for the next generation Google TPM. This TPM
has the same Ti50 firmware and fulfills the same interface.
Suggested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jett Rink <jettrink@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v6:
Update comments and string based on internal review.
Changes in v5:
Correct Suggested-by tag form.
Changes in v4:
Add Suggested-by tag. Sorry that I forget.
Changes in v3:
Refactor ternary operators into helper method.
Changes in v2:
Patchset 2 applies cleanly
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
index adf22992138e..fea744234aa0 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
@@ -30,8 +30,9 @@
#define TPM_CR50_MAX_BUFSIZE 64
#define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_SHORT_MS 2 /* Short timeout during transactions */
#define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_NOIRQ_MS 20 /* Timeout for TPM ready without IRQ */
-#define TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID 0x00281ae0L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
-#define TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID 0x504a6666L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */
+#define TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID 0x00281ae0L /* Device and vendor ID for Cr50 H1 */
+#define TPM_TI50_DT_I2C_DID_VID 0x504a6666L /* Device and vendor ID for Ti50 DT */
+#define TPM_TI50_OT_I2C_DID_VID 0x50666666L /* Device and vendor ID for TI50 OT */
#define TPM_CR50_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 3 /* Max retries due to I2C errors */
#define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_LO 55 /* Min usecs between retries on I2C */
#define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_HI 65 /* Max usecs between retries on I2C */
@@ -668,6 +669,27 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_cr50_i2c_match[] = {
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_cr50_i2c_match);
#endif
+/**
+ * tpm_cr50_vid_to_name() - Maps VID to name.
+ * @vendor: Vendor identifier to map to name
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * A valid string for the vendor or empty string
+ */
+static const char *tpm_cr50_vid_to_name(u32 vendor)
+{
+ switch (vendor) {
+ case TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID:
+ return "cr50";
+ case TPM_TI50_DT_I2C_DID_VID:
+ return "ti50 DT";
+ case TPM_TI50_OT_I2C_DID_VID:
+ return "ti50 OT";
+ default:
+ return "unknown";
+ }
+}
+
/**
* tpm_cr50_i2c_probe() - Driver probe function.
* @client: I2C client information.
@@ -741,14 +763,16 @@ static int tpm_cr50_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
}
vendor = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)buf);
- if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID && vendor != TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID) {
+ if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID &&
+ vendor != TPM_TI50_DT_I2C_DID_VID &&
+ vendor != TPM_TI50_OT_I2C_DID_VID) {
dev_err(dev, "Vendor ID did not match! ID was %08x\n", vendor);
tpm_cr50_release_locality(chip, true);
return -ENODEV;
}
dev_info(dev, "%s TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n",
- vendor == TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID ? "ti50" : "cr50",
+ tpm_cr50_vid_to_name(vendor),
client->addr, client->irq, vendor >> 16);
return tpm_chip_register(chip);
}
--
2.46.0.662.g92d0881bb0-goog
On Tue Sep 10, 2024 at 10:11 PM EEST, Jett Rink wrote: > Accept another DID:VID for the next generation Google TPM. This TPM > has the same Ti50 firmware and fulfills the same interface. > > Suggested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Jett Rink <jettrink@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> I applied this (will push later to my remote tree). BR, Jarkko
Hi Jarkko, On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 04:21:24PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > I applied this (will push later to my remote tree). I failed to find the patch in [1]. Is it somehow overlooked? [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/log/?h=next
On Tue Oct 22, 2024 at 7:03 AM EEST, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > Hi Jarkko, > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 04:21:24PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > I applied this (will push later to my remote tree). > > I failed to find the patch in [1]. Is it somehow overlooked? > > [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/log/?h=next It is applied to my master branch now: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/log/ Can you sanity check that it looks good? Thanks and sorry for the delay! BR, Jarkko
Looks good, thank you! -Jett On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 5:48 PM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue Oct 22, 2024 at 7:03 AM EEST, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > > Hi Jarkko, > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 04:21:24PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > I applied this (will push later to my remote tree). > > > > I failed to find the patch in [1]. Is it somehow overlooked? > > > > [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/log/?h=next > > It is applied to my master branch now: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/log/ > > Can you sanity check that it looks good? Thanks and sorry for the > delay! > > BR, Jarkko
On Tue Oct 22, 2024 at 7:03 AM EEST, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > Hi Jarkko, > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 04:21:24PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > I applied this (will push later to my remote tree). > > I failed to find the patch in [1]. Is it somehow overlooked? > > [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/log/?h=next I'll check this next week. Not on purpose if it is missing. BR, Jarkko
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.