Hi Stephen,

The following first two patches contains several fixes for having a correct
clock plan from the beggining in old ralink SoCs that could not be tested
when the driver was mainlained due to the lack of users. Now some issues
have been reported regarding RT3883 in openWRT[0] so I am addressing and 
fixing them here.

The last patch adds new clocks to properly support sdhc 48 MHz clock for
Mt7620, Mt7628 and Mt7688 SoCs. OpenWRT people updated to use SDHC upstream
driver so they were forced to add a not desired fixed dts node[1] to make it
works. The correct thing to do is just support it in mtmips driver. Hence
we have add it here.

Thanks in advance for your time.

Best regards,
    Sergio Paracuellos

[0]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/16054
[1]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/15896/files

Sergio Paracuellos (3):
  clk: ralink: mtmips: fix clock plan for Ralink SoC RT3883
  clk: ralink: mtmips: fix clocks probe order in oldest ralink SoCs
  clk: ralink: mtmips: add mmc related clocks for SoCs MT7620, MT7628
    and MT7688

 drivers/clk/ralink/clk-mtmips.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 6:40 AM Sergio Paracuellos
<sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> The following first two patches contains several fixes for having a correct
> clock plan from the beggining in old ralink SoCs that could not be tested
> when the driver was mainlained due to the lack of users. Now some issues
> have been reported regarding RT3883 in openWRT[0] so I am addressing and
> fixing them here.
>
> The last patch adds new clocks to properly support sdhc 48 MHz clock for
> Mt7620, Mt7628 and Mt7688 SoCs. OpenWRT people updated to use SDHC upstream
> driver so they were forced to add a not desired fixed dts node[1] to make it
> works. The correct thing to do is just support it in mtmips driver. Hence
> we have add it here.
>
> Thanks in advance for your time.
>
> Best regards,
>     Sergio Paracuellos
>
> [0]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/16054
> [1]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/15896/files
>
> Sergio Paracuellos (3):
>   clk: ralink: mtmips: fix clock plan for Ralink SoC RT3883
>   clk: ralink: mtmips: fix clocks probe order in oldest ralink SoCs
>   clk: ralink: mtmips: add mmc related clocks for SoCs MT7620, MT7628
>     and MT7688
>
>  drivers/clk/ralink/clk-mtmips.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Gentle ping on this series :-)

Thanks,
    Sergio Paracuelllos
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 8:41 AM Sergio Paracuellos
<sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 6:40 AM Sergio Paracuellos
> <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > The following first two patches contains several fixes for having a correct
> > clock plan from the beggining in old ralink SoCs that could not be tested
> > when the driver was mainlained due to the lack of users. Now some issues
> > have been reported regarding RT3883 in openWRT[0] so I am addressing and
> > fixing them here.
> >
> > The last patch adds new clocks to properly support sdhc 48 MHz clock for
> > Mt7620, Mt7628 and Mt7688 SoCs. OpenWRT people updated to use SDHC upstream
> > driver so they were forced to add a not desired fixed dts node[1] to make it
> > works. The correct thing to do is just support it in mtmips driver. Hence
> > we have add it here.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your time.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >     Sergio Paracuellos
> >
> > [0]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/16054
> > [1]: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/15896/files
> >
> > Sergio Paracuellos (3):
> >   clk: ralink: mtmips: fix clock plan for Ralink SoC RT3883
> >   clk: ralink: mtmips: fix clocks probe order in oldest ralink SoCs
> >   clk: ralink: mtmips: add mmc related clocks for SoCs MT7620, MT7628
> >     and MT7688
> >
> >  drivers/clk/ralink/clk-mtmips.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> Gentle ping on this series :-)

Another gentle ping on this series :-)

Thanks in advance for your time.

Best regards,
     Sergio Paracuellos