[PATCH v1 1/3] x86/mce: Add centaur vendor to support Zhaoxin MCA

Tony W Wang-oc posted 3 patches 2 months, 3 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v1 1/3] x86/mce: Add centaur vendor to support Zhaoxin MCA
Posted by Tony W Wang-oc 2 months, 3 weeks ago
From: Lyle Li <LyleLi@zhaoxin.com>

Zhaoxin consists of two vendors, X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN and
X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, so add the centaur vendor to support
Zhaoxin MCA in mce/core.c and mce/intel.c.

Signed-off-by: Lyle Li <LyleLi@zhaoxin.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c  | 42 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
index ad0623b65..b7b98c33a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
@@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ bool mce_usable_address(struct mce *m)
 
 	case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
 	case X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN:
+	case X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR:
 		return intel_mce_usable_address(m);
 
 	default:
@@ -513,6 +514,7 @@ bool mce_is_memory_error(struct mce *m)
 
 	case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
 	case X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN:
+	case X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR:
 		/*
 		 * Intel SDM Volume 3B - 15.9.2 Compound Error Codes
 		 *
@@ -1247,7 +1249,8 @@ static noinstr bool mce_check_crashing_cpu(void)
 
 		mcgstatus = __rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
 
-		if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN) {
+		if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN ||
+		    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR) {
 			if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_LMCES)
 				return false;
 		}
@@ -1521,7 +1524,8 @@ noinstr void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * on Intel, Zhaoxin only.
 	 */
 	if (m.cpuvendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
-	    m.cpuvendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN)
+	    m.cpuvendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN ||
+	    m.cpuvendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR)
 		lmce = m.mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_LMCES;
 
 	/*
@@ -1970,6 +1974,18 @@ static int __mcheck_cpu_apply_quirks(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR) {
+		/*
+		 * All newer Centaur CPUs support MCE broadcasting. Enable
+		 * synchronization with a one second timeout.
+		 */
+		if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf && c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
+		     c->x86 > 6) {
+			if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
+				cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
 		cfg->monarch_timeout = 0;
 	if (cfg->bootlog != 0)
@@ -2012,21 +2028,6 @@ static void __mcheck_cpu_init_early(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 }
 
-static void mce_centaur_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
-	struct mca_config *cfg = &mca_cfg;
-
-	 /*
-	  * All newer Centaur CPUs support MCE broadcasting. Enable
-	  * synchronization with a one second timeout.
-	  */
-	if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf && c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
-	     c->x86 > 6) {
-		if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
-			cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
-	}
-}
-
 static void mce_zhaoxin_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 	struct mce_bank *mce_banks = this_cpu_ptr(mce_banks_array);
@@ -2072,9 +2073,6 @@ static void __mcheck_cpu_init_vendor(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		break;
 
 	case X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR:
-		mce_centaur_feature_init(c);
-		break;
-
 	case X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN:
 		mce_zhaoxin_feature_init(c);
 		break;
@@ -2092,6 +2090,7 @@ static void __mcheck_cpu_clear_vendor(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		break;
 
 	case X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN:
+	case X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR:
 		mce_zhaoxin_feature_clear(c);
 		break;
 
@@ -2401,7 +2400,8 @@ static void vendor_disable_error_reporting(void)
 	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
 	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON ||
 	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
-	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN)
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN ||
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR)
 		return;
 
 	mce_disable_error_reporting();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c
index f6103e6bf..b7e67f4f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c
@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ static int cmci_supported(int *banks)
 	 * makes sure none of the backdoors are entered otherwise.
 	 */
 	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
-	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN)
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN &&
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) || lapic_get_maxlvt() < 6)
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/mce: Add centaur vendor to support Zhaoxin MCA
Posted by Borislav Petkov 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:43:47PM +0800, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
> From: Lyle Li <LyleLi@zhaoxin.com>
> 
> Zhaoxin consists of two vendors, X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN and
> X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, so add the centaur vendor to support
> Zhaoxin MCA in mce/core.c and mce/intel.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyle Li <LyleLi@zhaoxin.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>

If you're sending someone else's patch, then you need to add your SOB too.

Please educate yourself on the process:

https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/mce: Add centaur vendor to support Zhaoxin MCA
Posted by Borislav Petkov 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:43:47PM +0800, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
> @@ -1970,6 +1974,18 @@ static int __mcheck_cpu_apply_quirks(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR) {
> +		/*
> +		 * All newer Centaur CPUs support MCE broadcasting. Enable
> +		 * synchronization with a one second timeout.
> +		 */
> +		if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf && c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
> +		     c->x86 > 6) {
> +			if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
> +				cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
> +		}
> +	}

So if centaur == zhaoxin, why aren't you moving this hunk to
mce_zhaoxin_feature_init() instead?


-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/mce: Add centaur vendor to support Zhaoxin MCA
Posted by Tony W Wang-oc 2 months, 2 weeks ago

On 2024/9/13 22:27, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> 
> [这封邮件来自外部发件人 谨防风险]
> 
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:43:47PM +0800, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
>> @@ -1970,6 +1974,18 @@ static int __mcheck_cpu_apply_quirks(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>>                }
>>        }
>>
>> +     if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR) {
>> +             /*
>> +              * All newer Centaur CPUs support MCE broadcasting. Enable
>> +              * synchronization with a one second timeout.
>> +              */
>> +             if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf && c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
>> +                  c->x86 > 6) {
>> +                     if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
>> +                             cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
>> +             }
>> +     }
> 
> So if centaur == zhaoxin, why aren't you moving this hunk to
> mce_zhaoxin_feature_init() instead?
> 
>
Ok, will adjust the patch in the next version.

Sincerely!
TonyWWang-oc
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/mce: Add centaur vendor to support Zhaoxin MCA
Posted by Dave Hansen 2 months, 2 weeks ago
On 9/13/24 07:27, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> +	if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * All newer Centaur CPUs support MCE broadcasting. Enable
>> +		 * synchronization with a one second timeout.
>> +		 */
>> +		if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf && c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
>> +		     c->x86 > 6) {
>> +			if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
>> +				cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
>> +		}
>> +	}
> So if centaur == zhaoxin, why aren't you moving this hunk to
> mce_zhaoxin_feature_init() instead?

The centaur and zhaoxin logic is also _really_ close here:

>                 if (c->x86 > 6 || (c->x86_model == 0x19 || c->x86_model == 0x1f)) {
>                         if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
>                                 cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
>                 }

vs

>         if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf && c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
>              c->x86 > 6) {
>                 if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
>                         cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
>         }

I'd just randomly guess that the zhaoxin version is buggy because it
doesn't do a c->x86 check before the "(c->x86_model == 0x19 ||
c->x86_model == 0x1f)".

So instead of copying and pasting the same block over and over, can we
consolidate it a bit?

foo()
{
	/* Older CPUs do not do MCE broadcast: */
	if (c->x86 < 6)
		return;
	/* All newer ones do: */
	if (c->x86 > 6)
		goto mce_broadcast;

	/* Family 6 is mixed: */
	if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR) {
		if (c->x86_model == 0xf &&
		    c->x86_stepping >= 0xe)
			goto mce_broadcast;
	} else if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN) {
		if (c->x86_model == 0x19 ||
		    c->x86_model == 0x1f))
			goto mce_broadcast;
	}

	return;

mce_broadcast:
	if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
		cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
}


Heck, the Intel code can even go in there I think.  Wouldn't that tell
the story a bit better?
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/mce: Add centaur vendor to support Zhaoxin MCA
Posted by Tony W Wang-oc 2 months, 2 weeks ago

On 2024/9/13 23:47, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> 
> [这封邮件来自外部发件人 谨防风险]
> 
> On 9/13/24 07:27, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> +    if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR) {
>>> +            /*
>>> +             * All newer Centaur CPUs support MCE broadcasting. Enable
>>> +             * synchronization with a one second timeout.
>>> +             */
>>> +            if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf && c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
>>> +                 c->x86 > 6) {
>>> +                    if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
>>> +                            cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
>>> +            }
>>> +    }
>> So if centaur == zhaoxin, why aren't you moving this hunk to
>> mce_zhaoxin_feature_init() instead?
> 
> The centaur and zhaoxin logic is also _really_ close here:
> 
>>                  if (c->x86 > 6 || (c->x86_model == 0x19 || c->x86_model == 0x1f)) {
>>                          if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
>>                                  cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
>>                  }
> 
> vs
> 
>>          if ((c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0xf && c->x86_stepping >= 0xe) ||
>>               c->x86 > 6) {
>>                  if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
>>                          cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
>>          }
> 
> I'd just randomly guess that the zhaoxin version is buggy because it
> doesn't do a c->x86 check before the "(c->x86_model == 0x19 ||
> c->x86_model == 0x1f)".
> 

Yes, the check for c->x86 == 6 is omitted in the zhaoxin version.

> So instead of copying and pasting the same block over and over, can we
> consolidate it a bit?
> 
> foo()
> {
>          /* Older CPUs do not do MCE broadcast: */
>          if (c->x86 < 6)
>                  return;
>          /* All newer ones do: */
>          if (c->x86 > 6)
>                  goto mce_broadcast;
> 
>          /* Family 6 is mixed: */
>          if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR) {
>                  if (c->x86_model == 0xf &&
>                      c->x86_stepping >= 0xe)
>                          goto mce_broadcast;
>          } else if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN) {
>                  if (c->x86_model == 0x19 ||
>                      c->x86_model == 0x1f))
>                          goto mce_broadcast;
>          }
> 
>          return;
> 
> mce_broadcast:
>          if (cfg->monarch_timeout < 0)
>                  cfg->monarch_timeout = USEC_PER_SEC;
> }
>

Thank you! That makes more sense, and will adopt it into zhaoxin.c

Sincerely!
TonyWWang-oc