[PATCH v3 3/3] ocfs2: adjust spinlock_t ip_lock protection scope

Heming Zhao posted 3 patches 2 months, 3 weeks ago
[PATCH v3 3/3] ocfs2: adjust spinlock_t ip_lock protection scope
Posted by Heming Zhao 2 months, 3 weeks ago
Some of the spinlock_t ip_lock protection scopes are incorrect and
should follow the usage in 'struct ocfs2_inode_info'.

Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c  | 3 ++-
 fs/ocfs2/inode.c    | 5 +++--
 fs/ocfs2/resize.c   | 4 ++--
 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
index da78a04d6f0b..4a5900c8dc8f 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
@@ -2232,6 +2232,8 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
 	else
 		inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
 
+	spin_unlock(&oi->ip_lock);
+
 	i_uid_write(inode, be32_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_iuid));
 	i_gid_write(inode, be32_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_igid));
 	inode->i_mode    = be16_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_imode);
@@ -2242,7 +2244,6 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
 	inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode, ts);
 	ocfs2_unpack_timespec(&ts, be64_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_ictime_packed));
 	inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, ts);
-	spin_unlock(&oi->ip_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
index 2cc5c99fe941..4af9a6dfddd2 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
@@ -1348,14 +1348,15 @@ void ocfs2_refresh_inode(struct inode *inode,
 		inode->i_blocks = 0;
 	else
 		inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
+
+	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_lock);
+
 	inode_set_atime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_atime),
 			le32_to_cpu(fe->i_atime_nsec));
 	inode_set_mtime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_mtime),
 			le32_to_cpu(fe->i_mtime_nsec));
 	inode_set_ctime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_ctime),
 			le32_to_cpu(fe->i_ctime_nsec));
-
-	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_lock);
 }
 
 int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
index c4a4016d3866..b29f71357d63 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ static int ocfs2_update_last_group_and_inode(handle_t *handle,
 
 	spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_lock);
 	OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
-	le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)new_clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
 	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_lock);
+	le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)new_clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
 	i_size_write(bm_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
 
 	ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, bm_bh);
@@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input)
 
 	spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_lock);
 	OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
-	le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)input->clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
 	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_lock);
+	le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)input->clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
 	i_size_write(main_bm_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
 
 	ocfs2_update_super_and_backups(main_bm_inode, input->clusters);
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
index 9e847f59c9ef..3f91615d8702 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
@@ -798,9 +798,9 @@ static int ocfs2_block_group_alloc(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
 
 	spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
 	OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
+	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
 	fe->i_size = cpu_to_le64(ocfs2_clusters_to_bytes(alloc_inode->i_sb,
 					     le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters)));
-	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
 	i_size_write(alloc_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
 	alloc_inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(alloc_inode);
 	ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, alloc_inode, 0);
-- 
2.35.3
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ocfs2: adjust spinlock_t ip_lock protection scope
Posted by Joseph Qi 1 month, 3 weeks ago
This is a standalone cleanup, so please send in a separate thread.

Thanks,
Joseph

On 9/8/24 10:07 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
> Some of the spinlock_t ip_lock protection scopes are incorrect and
> should follow the usage in 'struct ocfs2_inode_info'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c  | 3 ++-
>  fs/ocfs2/inode.c    | 5 +++--
>  fs/ocfs2/resize.c   | 4 ++--
>  fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> index da78a04d6f0b..4a5900c8dc8f 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -2232,6 +2232,8 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
>  	else
>  		inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
>  
> +	spin_unlock(&oi->ip_lock);
> +
>  	i_uid_write(inode, be32_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_iuid));
>  	i_gid_write(inode, be32_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_igid));
>  	inode->i_mode    = be16_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_imode);
> @@ -2242,7 +2244,6 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
>  	inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode, ts);
>  	ocfs2_unpack_timespec(&ts, be64_to_cpu(lvb->lvb_ictime_packed));
>  	inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, ts);
> -	spin_unlock(&oi->ip_lock);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> index 2cc5c99fe941..4af9a6dfddd2 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> @@ -1348,14 +1348,15 @@ void ocfs2_refresh_inode(struct inode *inode,
>  		inode->i_blocks = 0;
>  	else
>  		inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_lock);
> +
>  	inode_set_atime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_atime),
>  			le32_to_cpu(fe->i_atime_nsec));
>  	inode_set_mtime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_mtime),
>  			le32_to_cpu(fe->i_mtime_nsec));
>  	inode_set_ctime(inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_ctime),
>  			le32_to_cpu(fe->i_ctime_nsec));
> -
> -	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_lock);
>  }
>  
>  int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> index c4a4016d3866..b29f71357d63 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/resize.c
> @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ static int ocfs2_update_last_group_and_inode(handle_t *handle,
>  
>  	spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_lock);
>  	OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
> -	le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)new_clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
>  	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(bm_inode)->ip_lock);
> +	le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)new_clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
>  	i_size_write(bm_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
>  
>  	ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, bm_bh);
> @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ int ocfs2_group_add(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_new_group_input *input)
>  
>  	spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_lock);
>  	OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
> -	le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)input->clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
>  	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(main_bm_inode)->ip_lock);
> +	le64_add_cpu(&fe->i_size, (u64)input->clusters << osb->s_clustersize_bits);
>  	i_size_write(main_bm_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
>  
>  	ocfs2_update_super_and_backups(main_bm_inode, input->clusters);
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> index 9e847f59c9ef..3f91615d8702 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
> @@ -798,9 +798,9 @@ static int ocfs2_block_group_alloc(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>  
>  	spin_lock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
>  	OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_clusters = le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters);
> +	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
>  	fe->i_size = cpu_to_le64(ocfs2_clusters_to_bytes(alloc_inode->i_sb,
>  					     le32_to_cpu(fe->i_clusters)));
> -	spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(alloc_inode)->ip_lock);
>  	i_size_write(alloc_inode, le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size));
>  	alloc_inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(alloc_inode);
>  	ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, alloc_inode, 0);
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ocfs2: adjust spinlock_t ip_lock protection scope
Posted by Heming Zhao 1 month, 3 weeks ago
On 10/8/24 15:18, Joseph Qi wrote:
> This is a standalone cleanup, so please send in a separate thread.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joseph

No problem.

-Heming

> 
> On 9/8/24 10:07 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
>> Some of the spinlock_t ip_lock protection scopes are incorrect and
>> should follow the usage in 'struct ocfs2_inode_info'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c  | 3 ++-
>>   fs/ocfs2/inode.c    | 5 +++--
>>   fs/ocfs2/resize.c   | 4 ++--
>>   fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 2 +-
>>   4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> index da78a04d6f0b..4a5900c8dc8f 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> @@ -2232,6 +2232,8 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
>>   	else
>>   		inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
>> ... ...