In the file drivers/base/platform.c, the return description of
platform_get_irq is 'non-zero IRQ number on success, negative
error number on failure.', so the check is wrong, fix it. And
when get irq failed, the function platform_get_irq logs an error
message.

Fixes: 5e2404493f9f ("ASoC: codecs: add MT6357 support")
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8365/mt8365-afe-pcm.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8365/mt8365-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8365/mt8365-afe-pcm.c
index df6dd8c5b..4ec86b71d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8365/mt8365-afe-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8365/mt8365-afe-pcm.c
@@ -2155,11 +2155,11 @@ static int mt8365_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	for (i = 0; i < afe->irqs_size; i++)
 		afe->irqs[i].irq_data = &irq_data[i];
 
-	irq_id = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq_id) {
-		dev_err_probe(afe->dev, irq_id, "np %s no irq\n", afe->dev->of_node->name);
-		return -ENXIO;
-	}
+	ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	irq_id = ret;
 	ret = devm_request_irq(afe->dev, irq_id, mt8365_afe_irq_handler,
 			       0, "Afe_ISR_Handle", (void *)afe);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.33.0

On Sun, 08 Sep 2024 21:46:04 +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
> In the file drivers/base/platform.c, the return description of
> platform_get_irq is 'non-zero IRQ number on success, negative
> error number on failure.', so the check is wrong, fix it. And
> when get irq failed, the function platform_get_irq logs an error
> message.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: codecs: fix the right check and simplify code
      commit: 130eb72d3cb38a629205a2a192800b4b1b9bc5c9

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

> In the file drivers/base/platform.c, the return description of
> platform_get_irq is 'non-zero IRQ number on success, negative
> error number on failure.', so the check is wrong, fix it. And
> when get irq failed, the function platform_get_irq logs an error
> message.

1. You may occasionally put more than 64 characters into text lines
   of such a change description.

2. How do you think about to split any changes into separate update steps?
   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.11-rc6#n81

3. I find the wording “fix the right check” confusing.


Regards,
Markus