All except one of the precursor patches were merged to Linus' tree
in the v6.11 merge window. The exception is a one-liner that is in
the maintainer tree and linux-next, but didn't get pulled this time.

Here's that patch (cherry-picked from intel-next so it has Chanwoo
Choi's sign-off). Also the two cleanup patches that remove all the
old FAM6 specific infrastructure.

All on top of TIP x86/cpu branch.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

Tony Luck (3):
  extcon: axp288: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines
  x86/cpu/vfm: Delete X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL[_STEPPING]() macros
  x86/cpu/vfm: Delete all the *_FAM6_ CPU #defines

 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h | 20 -------
 arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h  | 85 +---------------------------
 drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c       |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)


base-commit: fd82221a59fa5ce9dc7523e11c5e995104a28cb0
-- 
2.46.0

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:34:40AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> All except one of the precursor patches were merged to Linus' tree
> in the v6.11 merge window. The exception is a one-liner that is in
> the maintainer tree and linux-next, but didn't get pulled this time.

So when is Chanwoo planning on sending that one to Linus?

Or should he drop it and I pick up all three and finish this conversion?

Hmmm.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

>> All except one of the precursor patches were merged to Linus' tree
>> in the v6.11 merge window. The exception is a one-liner that is in
>> the maintainer tree and linux-next, but didn't get pulled this time.
>
> So when is Chanwoo planning on sending that one to Linus?

I don't know why it wasn't pulled.

> Or should he drop it and I pick up all three and finish this conversion?
>
> Hmmm.

That would be simplest at this point.

-Tony

Chanwoo,

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 07:43:35PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> All except one of the precursor patches were merged to Linus' tree
> >> in the v6.11 merge window. The exception is a one-liner that is in
> >> the maintainer tree and linux-next, but didn't get pulled this time.
> >
> > So when is Chanwoo planning on sending that one to Linus?
> 
> I don't know why it wasn't pulled.
> 
> > Or should he drop it and I pick up all three and finish this conversion?
> >
> > Hmmm.
> 
> That would be simplest at this point.

how about it?

How about you drop this patch from your tree and I take it with the other two
and send them to Linus now so that this conversion is done?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

> How about you drop this patch from your tree and I take it with the other two
> and send them to Linus now so that this conversion is done?

Sending to Linus now would be awesome!

Note that if you apply these to the x86/cpu branch you'll need to deal with
a merge issue for tip/master because some other tip branch has added:

#define INTEL_PENTIUM_PRO              IFM(6, 0x01)

to <asm/intel-family.h>

-Tony