drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Switch to use dev_err_probe() to simplify the error path and
unify a message template.
Using this helper is totally fine even if err is known to never
be -EPROBE_DEFER.
The benefit compared to a normal dev_err() is the standardized format
of the error code, it being emitted symbolically and the fact that
the error code is returned which allows more compact error paths.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhen <yanzhen@vivo.com>
---
Changes in v3:
-Rewrite the subject as 'irqchip: madera:'.
drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
index acceb6e7fa95..d5ad4466a140 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
@@ -199,9 +199,8 @@ static int madera_irq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = regmap_update_bits(madera->regmap, MADERA_IRQ1_CTRL,
MADERA_IRQ_POL_MASK, 0);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev,
- "Failed to set IRQ polarity: %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
+ "Failed to set IRQ polarity");
}
}
--
2.34.1
On Fri, Aug 30 2024 at 16:46, Yan Zhen wrote:
> Switch to use dev_err_probe() to simplify the error path and
> unify a message template.
>
> Using this helper is totally fine even if err is known to never
> be -EPROBE_DEFER.
Is fine? We don't care about fine. The question is whether it is correct
or not. And if so, then there wants to be an explanation why it is correct.
> Changes in v3:
> -Rewrite the subject as 'irqchip: madera:'.
Which is still wrong. Care to read Documentation/process/ ?
> drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
> index acceb6e7fa95..d5ad4466a140 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
> @@ -199,9 +199,8 @@ static int madera_irq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = regmap_update_bits(madera->regmap, MADERA_IRQ1_CTRL,
> MADERA_IRQ_POL_MASK, 0);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "Failed to set IRQ polarity: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + "Failed to set IRQ polarity");
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#line-breaks
But that's moot as Krzysztof pointed out that this patch just picks a
random instance of the code for no reason.
Thanks,
tglx
On 30/08/2024 10:46, Yan Zhen wrote:
> Switch to use dev_err_probe() to simplify the error path and
> unify a message template.
>
> Using this helper is totally fine even if err is known to never
> be -EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> The benefit compared to a normal dev_err() is the standardized format
> of the error code, it being emitted symbolically and the fact that
> the error code is returned which allows more compact error paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhen <yanzhen@vivo.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> -Rewrite the subject as 'irqchip: madera:'.
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
> index acceb6e7fa95..d5ad4466a140 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-madera.c
> @@ -199,9 +199,8 @@ static int madera_irq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = regmap_update_bits(madera->regmap, MADERA_IRQ1_CTRL,
> MADERA_IRQ_POL_MASK, 0);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "Failed to set IRQ polarity: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + "Failed to set IRQ polarity");
Another example, one of many from @vivo.com, where you touch one line
and leave everything else.
Are you going to send 5 different patches - one per each line? It's
nonsense.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.