[PATCH v1] clk: sunxi: sun9i-mmc: Use dev_err_probe() to simplfy code

Chen Yufan posted 1 patch 1 year, 5 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[PATCH v1] clk: sunxi: sun9i-mmc: Use dev_err_probe() to simplfy code
Posted by Chen Yufan 1 year, 5 months ago
Use dev_err_probe() can make code a bit simpler.

Signed-off-by: Chen Yufan <chenyufan@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
index 91074017c04f..e6b62e421936 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
@@ -134,10 +134,8 @@ static int sun9i_a80_mmc_config_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = reset_control_deassert(data->reset);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Reset deassert err %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Reset deassert err %d\n");
 
 	clk_parent = __clk_get_name(data->clk);
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-- 
2.39.0
Re: [PATCH v1] clk: sunxi: sun9i-mmc: Use dev_err_probe() to simplfy code
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 year, 5 months ago
On 30/08/2024 09:27, Chen Yufan wrote:
> Use dev_err_probe() can make code a bit simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yufan <chenyufan@vivo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
> index 91074017c04f..e6b62e421936 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-mmc.c
> @@ -134,10 +134,8 @@ static int sun9i_a80_mmc_config_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = reset_control_deassert(data->reset);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Reset deassert err %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Reset deassert err %d\n");

This is ridiculous.

You change something which cannot defer, while leaving other places
which actually can defer and could benefit.

Stop spamming with such low quality patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof