Modify test_find_first_bit so it modifies a local copy of bitmap rather
than modifying the input bitmap, which removes the requirement of
placing it last in the tests.
Calls to test_find_first_and_bit and test_find_next_and_bit are placed
after test_find_first_bit, which makes them use a bitmap entirely filled
rather than the expected bitmap (random-filled or sparse).
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
index d3fb09e6eff1..aee2ebb6b3cd 100644
--- a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
+++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
@@ -30,18 +30,20 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
/*
- * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm. It should be called after
- * all other tests for the same bitmap because it sets all bits of bitmap to 1.
+ * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm.
*/
static int __init test_find_first_bit(void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
unsigned long i, cnt;
ktime_t time;
+ bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+
time = ktime_get();
for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) {
- i = find_first_bit(bitmap, len);
- __clear_bit(i, bitmap);
+ i = find_first_bit(cp, len);
+ __clear_bit(i, cp);
}
time = ktime_get() - time;
pr_err("find_first_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
--
2.39.2
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:59:24AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Modify test_find_first_bit so it modifies a local copy of bitmap rather
> than modifying the input bitmap, which removes the requirement of
> placing it last in the tests.
>
> Calls to test_find_first_and_bit and test_find_next_and_bit are placed
> after test_find_first_bit, which makes them use a bitmap entirely filled
> rather than the expected bitmap (random-filled or sparse).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> ---
> lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
> index d3fb09e6eff1..aee2ebb6b3cd 100644
> --- a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
> +++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
> @@ -30,18 +30,20 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
> static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
>
> /*
> - * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm. It should be called after
> - * all other tests for the same bitmap because it sets all bits of bitmap to 1.
> + * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm.
> */
Good to drop it, moreover, the comment is incorrect - we set all bits
to 0, not 1.
> static int __init test_find_first_bit(void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
> {
> + static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
This days we can allocate automatic variables, which is better than
statics:
unsigned long *cp __free(bitmap) = bitmap_alloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
If no objections, I can fix it inplace. The rest of the series looks
good. I'll add it in bitmap-for-next for testing shortly.
Thanks,
Yury
> unsigned long i, cnt;
> ktime_t time;
>
> + bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
> +
> time = ktime_get();
> for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) {
> - i = find_first_bit(bitmap, len);
> - __clear_bit(i, bitmap);
> + i = find_first_bit(cp, len);
> + __clear_bit(i, cp);
> }
> time = ktime_get() - time;
> pr_err("find_first_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
> --
> 2.39.2
On 2024-08-30 17:46, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:59:24AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Modify test_find_first_bit so it modifies a local copy of bitmap rather
>> than modifying the input bitmap, which removes the requirement of
>> placing it last in the tests.
>>
>> Calls to test_find_first_and_bit and test_find_next_and_bit are placed
>> after test_find_first_bit, which makes them use a bitmap entirely filled
>> rather than the expected bitmap (random-filled or sparse).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
>> ---
>> lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
>> index d3fb09e6eff1..aee2ebb6b3cd 100644
>> --- a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
>> +++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
>> @@ -30,18 +30,20 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
>> static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
>>
>> /*
>> - * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm. It should be called after
>> - * all other tests for the same bitmap because it sets all bits of bitmap to 1.
>> + * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm.
>> */
>
> Good to drop it, moreover, the comment is incorrect - we set all bits
> to 0, not 1.
>
>> static int __init test_find_first_bit(void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
>> {
>> + static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
>
> This days we can allocate automatic variables, which is better than
> statics:
>
> unsigned long *cp __free(bitmap) = bitmap_alloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> If no objections, I can fix it inplace. The rest of the series looks
> good. I'll add it in bitmap-for-next for testing shortly.
I'm ok with the in-place fix, thanks!
Mathieu
>
> Thanks,
> Yury
>
>> unsigned long i, cnt;
>> ktime_t time;
>>
>> + bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
>> +
>> time = ktime_get();
>> for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) {
>> - i = find_first_bit(bitmap, len);
>> - __clear_bit(i, bitmap);
>> + i = find_first_bit(cp, len);
>> + __clear_bit(i, cp);
>> }
>> time = ktime_get() - time;
>> pr_err("find_first_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
>> --
>> 2.39.2
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.