drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
As opposed to open-code, using the ERR_CAST macro clearly indicates that
this is a pointer to an error value and a type conversion was performed.
Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@vivo.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
index 7a9afd5231d5..5ed5cfc2b280 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
@@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ struct ib_mr *rvt_reg_user_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 length,
umem = ib_umem_get(pd->device, start, length, mr_access_flags);
if (IS_ERR(umem))
- return (void *)umem;
+ return ERR_CAST(umem);
n = ib_umem_num_pages(umem);
mr = __rvt_alloc_mr(n, pd);
if (IS_ERR(mr)) {
- ret = (struct ib_mr *)mr;
+ ret = ERR_CAST(mr);
goto bail_umem;
}
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ struct ib_mr *rvt_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
mr = __rvt_alloc_mr(max_num_sg, pd);
if (IS_ERR(mr))
- return (struct ib_mr *)mr;
+ return ERR_CAST(mr);
return &mr->ibmr;
}
--
2.17.1
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:27:20 +0800, Shen Lichuan wrote:
> As opposed to open-code, using the ERR_CAST macro clearly indicates that
> this is a pointer to an error value and a type conversion was performed.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] RDMA/sw/rdmavt/mr: Convert to use ERR_CAST()
https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/8f1f60b21b9603
Best regards,
--
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
On 8/28/24 4:27 AM, Shen Lichuan wrote:
> As opposed to open-code, using the ERR_CAST macro clearly indicates that
> this is a pointer to an error value and a type conversion was performed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@vivo.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> index 7a9afd5231d5..5ed5cfc2b280 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> @@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ struct ib_mr *rvt_reg_user_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 length,
>
> umem = ib_umem_get(pd->device, start, length, mr_access_flags);
> if (IS_ERR(umem))
> - return (void *)umem;
> + return ERR_CAST(umem);
>
> n = ib_umem_num_pages(umem);
>
> mr = __rvt_alloc_mr(n, pd);
> if (IS_ERR(mr)) {
> - ret = (struct ib_mr *)mr;
> + ret = ERR_CAST(mr);
> goto bail_umem;
> }
>
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ struct ib_mr *rvt_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
>
> mr = __rvt_alloc_mr(max_num_sg, pd);
> if (IS_ERR(mr))
> - return (struct ib_mr *)mr;
> + return ERR_CAST(mr);
>
> return &mr->ibmr;
> }
I don't think this is really necessary. You are not making the code more
readable. It doesn't simplify things. So I'm not going to Ack it, but I won't
Nak either.
-Denny
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:06:17PM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 8/28/24 4:27 AM, Shen Lichuan wrote:
> > As opposed to open-code, using the ERR_CAST macro clearly indicates that
> > this is a pointer to an error value and a type conversion was performed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@vivo.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> > index 7a9afd5231d5..5ed5cfc2b280 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c
> > @@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ struct ib_mr *rvt_reg_user_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, u64 start, u64 length,
> >
> > umem = ib_umem_get(pd->device, start, length, mr_access_flags);
> > if (IS_ERR(umem))
> > - return (void *)umem;
> > + return ERR_CAST(umem);
> >
> > n = ib_umem_num_pages(umem);
> >
> > mr = __rvt_alloc_mr(n, pd);
> > if (IS_ERR(mr)) {
> > - ret = (struct ib_mr *)mr;
> > + ret = ERR_CAST(mr);
> > goto bail_umem;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ struct ib_mr *rvt_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd, enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
> >
> > mr = __rvt_alloc_mr(max_num_sg, pd);
> > if (IS_ERR(mr))
> > - return (struct ib_mr *)mr;
> > + return ERR_CAST(mr);
> >
> > return &mr->ibmr;
> > }
>
> I don't think this is really necessary. You are not making the code more
> readable. It doesn't simplify things. So I'm not going to Ack it, but I won't
> Nak either.
I will take it because ERR_CAST is slightly better way to return error pointers.
Thanks
>
> -Denny
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.