When acpi_evaluate_dsm failed, the warning message lacks the rev
and func information which is available and helpful. For example,
iwlwifi would make DSM queries for lari config, and with some HW,
DSM error would return:
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
With this patch, the warning would be more informative:
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:1 (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:6 (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:7 (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:8 (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:3 (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:9 (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:10 (0x1001)
	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:12 (0x1001)

Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/utils.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
index ae9384282273..6de542d99518 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
@@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 func,
 
 	if (ret != AE_NOT_FOUND)
 		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
-				 "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb (0x%x)\n", guid, ret);
+				 "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb rev:%lld func:%lld (0x%x)\n",
+				 guid, rev, func, ret);
 
 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
2.39.2

I made a mistake about the patch title, please ignore this and I will send another one.

David

At 2024-08-26 12:38:58, "David Wang" <00107082@163.com> wrote:
>When acpi_evaluate_dsm failed, the warning message lacks the rev
>and func information which is available and helpful. For example,
>iwlwifi would make DSM queries for lari config, and with some HW,
>DSM error would return:
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001)
>With this patch, the warning would be more informative:
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:1 (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:6 (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:7 (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:8 (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:3 (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:9 (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:10 (0x1001)
>	ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:12 (0x1001)
>
>Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
>---
> drivers/acpi/utils.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>index ae9384282273..6de542d99518 100644
>--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>@@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 func,
> 
> 	if (ret != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> 		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
>-				 "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb (0x%x)\n", guid, ret);
>+				 "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb rev:%lld func:%lld (0x%x)\n",
>+				 guid, rev, func, ret);
> 
> 	return NULL;
> }
>-- 
>2.39.2