pcim_iomap_regions() and pcim_iomap_table() have been deprecated by
the PCI subsystem in commit e354bb84a4c1 ("PCI: Deprecate
pcim_iomap_table(), pcim_iomap_regions_request_all()").
Replace these functions with the function pcim_iomap_region().
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/common/cavium_ptp.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/common/cavium_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/common/cavium_ptp.c
index 9fd717b9cf69..1849c62cde1d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/common/cavium_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/common/cavium_ptp.c
@@ -239,11 +239,11 @@ static int cavium_ptp_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if (err)
goto error_free;
- err = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << PCI_PTP_BAR_NO, pci_name(pdev));
- if (err)
+ clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO, pci_name(pdev));
+ if (IS_ERR(clock->reg_base)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(clock->reg_base);
goto error_free;
-
- clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[PCI_PTP_BAR_NO];
+ }
spin_lock_init(&clock->spin_lock);
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int cavium_ptp_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
clock_cfg = readq(clock->reg_base + PTP_CLOCK_CFG);
clock_cfg &= ~PTP_CLOCK_CFG_PTP_EN;
writeq(clock_cfg, clock->reg_base + PTP_CLOCK_CFG);
- pcim_iounmap_regions(pdev, 1 << PCI_PTP_BAR_NO);
+ pcim_iounmap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO);
error_free:
devm_kfree(dev, clock);
--
2.46.0
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:47:37PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> pcim_iomap_regions() and pcim_iomap_table() have been deprecated by
> the PCI subsystem in commit e354bb84a4c1 ("PCI: Deprecate
> pcim_iomap_table(), pcim_iomap_regions_request_all()").
>
> Replace these functions with the function pcim_iomap_region().
...
> - err = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << PCI_PTP_BAR_NO, pci_name(pdev));
> - if (err)
> + clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO, pci_name(pdev));
> + if (IS_ERR(clock->reg_base)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(clock->reg_base);
> goto error_free;
> -
> - clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[PCI_PTP_BAR_NO];
> + }
Perhaps
clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO, pci_name(pdev));
err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(clock->reg_base);
if (err)
goto error_free;
This will make your patch smaller and neater.
P.S. Do you use --histogram diff algo when preparing patches?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, 2024-08-22 at 17:44 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:47:37PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > pcim_iomap_regions() and pcim_iomap_table() have been deprecated by
> > the PCI subsystem in commit e354bb84a4c1 ("PCI: Deprecate
> > pcim_iomap_table(), pcim_iomap_regions_request_all()").
> >
> > Replace these functions with the function pcim_iomap_region().
>
> ...
>
> > - err = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> > pci_name(pdev));
> > - if (err)
> > + clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> > pci_name(pdev));
> > + if (IS_ERR(clock->reg_base)) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(clock->reg_base);
> > goto error_free;
> > -
> > - clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[PCI_PTP_BAR_NO];
> > + }
>
> Perhaps
>
> clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> pci_name(pdev));
> err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(clock->reg_base);
> if (err)
> goto error_free;
>
> This will make your patch smaller and neater.
>
> P.S. Do you use --histogram diff algo when preparing patches?
So far not.
Should one do that?
P.
>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:51 PM Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-08-22 at 17:44 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:47:37PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
...
> > > - err = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > - if (err)
> > > + clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > + if (IS_ERR(clock->reg_base)) {
> > > + err = PTR_ERR(clock->reg_base);
> > > goto error_free;
> > > -
> > > - clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[PCI_PTP_BAR_NO];
> > > + }
> >
> > Perhaps
> >
> > clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> > pci_name(pdev));
> > err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(clock->reg_base);
> > if (err)
> > goto error_free;
> >
> > This will make your patch smaller and neater.
> >
> > P.S. Do you use --histogram diff algo when preparing patches?
>
> So far not.
> Should one do that?
Id doesn't alter your code, it's in addition to what I suggested, but
as Linus shared that there is no reason to avoid using --histogram not
only in Linux kernel, but in general as it produces more
human-readable diff:s.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 18:41 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 5:51 PM Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-08-22 at 17:44 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:47:37PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > - err = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> > > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > > - if (err)
> > > > + clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> > > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(clock->reg_base)) {
> > > > + err = PTR_ERR(clock->reg_base);
> > > > goto error_free;
> > > > -
> > > > - clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[PCI_PTP_BAR_NO];
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Perhaps
> > >
> > > clock->reg_base = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, PCI_PTP_BAR_NO,
> > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(clock->reg_base);
> > > if (err)
> > > goto error_free;
> > >
> > > This will make your patch smaller and neater.
> > >
> > > P.S. Do you use --histogram diff algo when preparing patches?
> >
> > So far not.
> > Should one do that?
>
> Id doesn't alter your code, it's in addition to what I suggested, but
> as Linus shared that there is no reason to avoid using --histogram
> not
> only in Linux kernel, but in general as it produces more
> human-readable diff:s.
If the Boss says so, one can surely do that \o/
Though if it has 0 disadvantages I'd propose proposing to the git-devs
to make it the default.
P.
>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 6:52 PM Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 18:41 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > Though if it has 0 disadvantages I'd propose proposing to the git-devs > to make it the default. It's slower. so the people from https://occ.deadnet.se/about/ won't be happy. And more power consuming, so maybe not so environment friendly after all :-P -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.