The SAM9X60 SoC family has a similar OTPC to the SAMA7G5 family.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml        | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml
index cc25f2927682..d98b6711bdfd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ allOf:
 properties:
   compatible:
     items:
+      - const: microchip,sam9x60-otpc
       - const: microchip,sama7g5-otpc
       - const: syscon
 
-- 
2.39.2

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 12:59:34PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> The SAM9X60 SoC family has a similar OTPC to the SAMA7G5 family.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml        | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml
> index cc25f2927682..d98b6711bdfd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ allOf:
>  properties:
>    compatible:
>      items:
> +      - const: microchip,sam9x60-otpc
>        - const: microchip,sama7g5-otpc
>        - const: syscon

As Rob's bot pointed out, this breaks the existing devicetrees. If you
want a fallback to the sama7g5, then you will need to add a new items
list here, alongside the existing one.

Cheers,
Conor.

>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:59:34 +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> The SAM9X60 SoC family has a similar OTPC to the SAMA7G5 family.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml        | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.example.dtb: efuse@e8c00000: compatible:0: 'microchip,sam9x60-otpc' was expected
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml#
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.example.dtb: efuse@e8c00000: compatible:1: 'microchip,sama7g5-otpc' was expected
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml#
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.example.dtb: efuse@e8c00000: compatible: ['microchip,sama7g5-otpc', 'syscon'] is too short
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml#
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.example.dtb: efuse@e8c00000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible' was unexpected)
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml#

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240821105943.230281-4-ada@thorsis.com

The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.