Use devm_clk_get_enabled() simplify zynq_gpio_probe() and zynq_gpio_remove().

Signed-off-by: Rong Qianfeng <rongqianfeng@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
index 466e23031afc..1a42336dfc1d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
@@ -940,16 +940,10 @@ static int zynq_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	chip->ngpio = gpio->p_data->ngpio;
 
 	/* Retrieve GPIO clock */
-	gpio->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	gpio->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(gpio->clk))
 		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(gpio->clk), "input clock not found.\n");
 
-	ret = clk_prepare_enable(gpio->clk);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to enable clock.\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
-
 	spin_lock_init(&gpio->dirlock);
 
 	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
@@ -999,7 +993,6 @@ static int zynq_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
 err_pm_dis:
 	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
-	clk_disable_unprepare(gpio->clk);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1019,7 +1012,6 @@ static void zynq_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() Failed\n");
 	gpiochip_remove(&gpio->chip);
-	clk_disable_unprepare(gpio->clk);
 	device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, 0);
 	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
 }
-- 
2.39.0

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>


On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 20:16:51 +0800, Rong Qianfeng wrote:
> Use devm_clk_get_enabled() simplify zynq_gpio_probe() and zynq_gpio_remove().
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[2/2] gpio: zynq: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled()
      commit: 8d2aaf4382b7c2ae4eae17c3eb71474eddbb5c4b

Best regards,
-- 
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 2:17 PM Rong Qianfeng <rongqianfeng@vivo.com> wrote:
>
> Use devm_clk_get_enabled() simplify zynq_gpio_probe() and zynq_gpio_remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rong Qianfeng <rongqianfeng@vivo.com>
> ---

Michal,

This changes the order of operations in remove(), could you test it or
at least give your Ack here?

Bart

Hi Bart,

On 9/2/24 12:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 2:17 PM Rong Qianfeng <rongqianfeng@vivo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Use devm_clk_get_enabled() simplify zynq_gpio_probe() and zynq_gpio_remove().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rong Qianfeng <rongqianfeng@vivo.com>
>> ---
> 
> Michal,
> 
> This changes the order of operations in remove(), could you test it or
> at least give your Ack here?

Changes look good to me.
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>

Thanks,
Michal