[PATCH v2] net/socket: Check cgroup_bpf_enabled() only once in do_sock_getsockopt

Tze-nan Wu posted 1 patch 1 month ago
include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 13 ++++++-------
net/socket.c               |  9 ++++++---
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
[PATCH v2] net/socket: Check cgroup_bpf_enabled() only once in do_sock_getsockopt
Posted by Tze-nan Wu 1 month ago
The return value from `cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)` can change
between the invocations of `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN` and
`BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`.

If `cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)` changes from "false" to
"true" between the invocations of `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN` and
`BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`, `BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT` will
receive an -EFAULT from `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(max_optlen=0)`
due to `get_user()` was not reached in `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN`.

Scenario shown as below:

           `process A`                      `process B`
           -----------                      ------------
  BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN
                                            enable CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT
  BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT (-EFAULT)

To prevent this, invoke `cgroup_bpf_enabled()` only once and cache the
result in a newly added local variable `enabled`.
Both `BPF_CGROUP_*` macros in `do_sock_getsockopt` will then check their
condition using the same `enabled` variable as the condition variable,
instead of using the return values from `cgroup_bpf_enabled` called by
themselves as the condition variable(which could yield different results).
This ensures that either both `BPF_CGROUP_*` macros pass the condition
or neither does.

Co-developed-by: Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>
Co-developed-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
---

Chagnes from v1 to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240819082513.27176-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com/
  Instead of using cgroup_lock in the fastpath, invoke cgroup_bpf_enabled
  only once and cache the value in the variable `enabled`. `BPF_CGROUP_*`
  macros in do_sock_getsockopt can then both check their condition with
  the same variable, ensuring that either they both passing the condition
  or both do not.

Appreciate for reviewing this!
This patch should make cgroup_bpf_enabled() only using once,
but not sure if "BPF_CGROUP_*" is modifiable?(not familiar with code here)

If it's not, then maybe I can come up another patch like below one:
	+++ b/net/socket.c
	  	int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
	 	const struct proto_ops *ops;
	 	int err;
	+	bool enabled;
	
	 	err = security_socket_getsockopt(sock, level, optname);
	 	if (err)
	 		return err;
	
	-	if (!compat)
	+	enabled = cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT);
	+   if (!compat && enabled)
			max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);

But this will cause do_sock_getsockopt calling cgroup_bpf_enabled up to
three times , Wondering which approach will be more acceptable?

---
 include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 13 ++++++-------
 net/socket.c               |  9 ++++++---
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
index fb3c3e7181e6..251632d52fa9 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
@@ -390,20 +390,19 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
 	__ret;								       \
 })
 
-#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen)			       \
+#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled)			       \
 ({									       \
 	int __ret = 0;							       \
-	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))			       \
+	if (enabled)			       \
 		copy_from_sockptr(&__ret, optlen, sizeof(int));		       \
 	__ret;								       \
 })
 
 #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen,   \
-				       max_optlen, retval)		       \
+				       max_optlen, retval, enabled)		       \
 ({									       \
 	int __ret = retval;						       \
-	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) &&			       \
-	    cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))		       \
+	if (enabled && cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))		    \
 		if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt ||		       \
 		    !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
 					tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt,	       \
@@ -518,9 +517,9 @@ static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
 #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SOCK_OPS(sock_ops) ({ 0; })
 #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_DEVICE_CGROUP(atype, major, minor, access) ({ 0; })
 #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SYSCTL(head,table,write,buf,count,pos) ({ 0; })
-#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen) ({ 0; })
+#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled) ({ 0; })
 #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, \
-				       optlen, max_optlen, retval) ({ retval; })
+				       optlen, max_optlen, retval, enabled) ({ retval; })
 #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT_KERN(sock, level, optname, optval, \
 					    optlen, retval) ({ retval; })
 #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index fcbdd5bc47ac..5336a2755bb4 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -2365,13 +2365,16 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
 	int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
 	const struct proto_ops *ops;
 	int err;
+	bool enabled;
 
 	err = security_socket_getsockopt(sock, level, optname);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (!compat)
-		max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
+	if (!compat) {
+		enabled = cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT);
+		max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled);
+	}
 
 	ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
 	if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
@@ -2390,7 +2393,7 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
 	if (!compat)
 		err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock->sk, level, optname,
 						     optval, optlen, max_optlen,
-						     err);
+						     err, enabled);
 
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH v2] net/socket: Check cgroup_bpf_enabled() only once in do_sock_getsockopt
Posted by Kuniyuki Iwashima 1 month ago
From: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:56:27 +0800
> The return value from `cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)` can change
> between the invocations of `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN` and
> `BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`.
> 
> If `cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)` changes from "false" to
> "true" between the invocations of `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN` and
> `BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`, `BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT` will
> receive an -EFAULT from `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(max_optlen=0)`
> due to `get_user()` was not reached in `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN`.
> 
> Scenario shown as below:
> 
>            `process A`                      `process B`
>            -----------                      ------------
>   BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN
>                                             enable CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT
>   BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT (-EFAULT)
> 
> To prevent this, invoke `cgroup_bpf_enabled()` only once and cache the
> result in a newly added local variable `enabled`.
> Both `BPF_CGROUP_*` macros in `do_sock_getsockopt` will then check their
> condition using the same `enabled` variable as the condition variable,
> instead of using the return values from `cgroup_bpf_enabled` called by
> themselves as the condition variable(which could yield different results).
> This ensures that either both `BPF_CGROUP_*` macros pass the condition
> or neither does.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>
> Co-developed-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> 
> Chagnes from v1 to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240819082513.27176-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com/
>   Instead of using cgroup_lock in the fastpath, invoke cgroup_bpf_enabled
>   only once and cache the value in the variable `enabled`. `BPF_CGROUP_*`
>   macros in do_sock_getsockopt can then both check their condition with
>   the same variable, ensuring that either they both passing the condition
>   or both do not.
> 
> Appreciate for reviewing this!
> This patch should make cgroup_bpf_enabled() only using once,
> but not sure if "BPF_CGROUP_*" is modifiable?(not familiar with code here)
> 
> If it's not, then maybe I can come up another patch like below one:
> 	+++ b/net/socket.c
> 	  	int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
> 	 	const struct proto_ops *ops;
> 	 	int err;
> 	+	bool enabled;
> 	
> 	 	err = security_socket_getsockopt(sock, level, optname);
> 	 	if (err)
> 	 		return err;
> 	
> 	-	if (!compat)
> 	+	enabled = cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT);
> 	+   if (!compat && enabled)
> 			max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
> 
> But this will cause do_sock_getsockopt calling cgroup_bpf_enabled up to
> three times , Wondering which approach will be more acceptable?
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 13 ++++++-------
>  net/socket.c               |  9 ++++++---
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> index fb3c3e7181e6..251632d52fa9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> @@ -390,20 +390,19 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
>  	__ret;								       \
>  })
>  
> -#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen)			       \
> +#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled)			       \

Please keep \ aligned.  Same for other places.


>  ({									       \
>  	int __ret = 0;							       \
> -	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))			       \

Can you assign 'enabled' here to hide its usage in the macro ?


> +	if (enabled)			       \
>  		copy_from_sockptr(&__ret, optlen, sizeof(int));		       \
>  	__ret;								       \
>  })
>  
>  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen,   \
> -				       max_optlen, retval)		       \
> +				       max_optlen, retval, enabled)		       \
>  ({									       \
>  	int __ret = retval;						       \
> -	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) &&			       \
> -	    cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))		       \
> +	if (enabled && cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))		    \
>  		if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt ||		       \
>  		    !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
>  					tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt,	       \
> @@ -518,9 +517,9 @@ static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
>  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SOCK_OPS(sock_ops) ({ 0; })
>  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_DEVICE_CGROUP(atype, major, minor, access) ({ 0; })
>  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SYSCTL(head,table,write,buf,count,pos) ({ 0; })
> -#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen) ({ 0; })
> +#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled) ({ 0; })
>  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, \
> -				       optlen, max_optlen, retval) ({ retval; })
> +				       optlen, max_optlen, retval, enabled) ({ retval; })
>  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT_KERN(sock, level, optname, optval, \
>  					    optlen, retval) ({ retval; })
>  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index fcbdd5bc47ac..5336a2755bb4 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -2365,13 +2365,16 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
>  	int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
>  	const struct proto_ops *ops;
>  	int err;
> +	bool enabled;

Please keep reverse xmas tree order.
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#local-variable-ordering-reverse-xmas-tree-rcs


>  
>  	err = security_socket_getsockopt(sock, level, optname);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	if (!compat)
> -		max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
> +	if (!compat) {
> +		enabled = cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT);
> +		max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled);
> +	}
>  
>  	ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
>  	if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
> @@ -2390,7 +2393,7 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
>  	if (!compat)
>  		err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock->sk, level, optname,
>  						     optval, optlen, max_optlen,
> -						     err);
> +						     err, enabled);
>  
>  	return err;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.45.2
Re: [PATCH v2] net/socket: Check cgroup_bpf_enabled() only once in do_sock_getsockopt
Posted by Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南) 4 weeks, 1 day ago
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 11:18 -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  From: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:56:27 +0800
> > The return value from `cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)` can
> change
> > between the invocations of `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN` and
> > `BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`.
> > 
> > If `cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)` changes from "false" to
> > "true" between the invocations of
> `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN` and
> > `BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`, `BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT`
> will
> > receive an -EFAULT from
> `__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(max_optlen=0)`
> > due to `get_user()` was not reached in
> `BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN`.
> > 
> > Scenario shown as below:
> > 
> >            `process A`                      `process B`
> >            -----------                      ------------
> >   BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN
> >                                             enable
> CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT
> >   BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT (-EFAULT)
> > 
> > To prevent this, invoke `cgroup_bpf_enabled()` only once and cache
> the
> > result in a newly added local variable `enabled`.
> > Both `BPF_CGROUP_*` macros in `do_sock_getsockopt` will then check
> their
> > condition using the same `enabled` variable as the condition
> variable,
> > instead of using the return values from `cgroup_bpf_enabled` called
> by
> > themselves as the condition variable(which could yield different
> results).
> > This ensures that either both `BPF_CGROUP_*` macros pass the
> condition
> > or neither does.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yanghui Li <yanghui.li@mediatek.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Chagnes from v1 to v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240819082513.27176-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com/
> >   Instead of using cgroup_lock in the fastpath, invoke
> cgroup_bpf_enabled
> >   only once and cache the value in the variable `enabled`.
> `BPF_CGROUP_*`
> >   macros in do_sock_getsockopt can then both check their condition
> with
> >   the same variable, ensuring that either they both passing the
> condition
> >   or both do not.
> > 
> > Appreciate for reviewing this!
> > This patch should make cgroup_bpf_enabled() only using once,
> > but not sure if "BPF_CGROUP_*" is modifiable?(not familiar with
> code here)
> > 
> > If it's not, then maybe I can come up another patch like below one:
> > 	+++ b/net/socket.c
> > 	  	int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
> > 	 	const struct proto_ops *ops;
> > 	 	int err;
> > 	+	bool enabled;
> > 	
> > 	 	err = security_socket_getsockopt(sock, level, optname);
> > 	 	if (err)
> > 	 		return err;
> > 	
> > 	-	if (!compat)
> > 	+	enabled = cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT);
> > 	+   if (!compat && enabled)
> > 			max_optlen =
> BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
> > 
> > But this will cause do_sock_getsockopt calling cgroup_bpf_enabled
> up to
> > three times , Wondering which approach will be more acceptable?
> > 
> > ---
> >  include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 13 ++++++-------
> >  net/socket.c               |  9 ++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-
> cgroup.h
> > index fb3c3e7181e6..251632d52fa9 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > @@ -390,20 +390,19 @@ static inline bool
> cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
> >  	__ret;								
>        \
> >  })
> >  
> > -#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen)			
>        \
> > +#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled)		
> 	       \
> 
> Please keep \ aligned.  Same for other places.
> 
> 
> >  ({									
>        \
> >  	int __ret = 0;							
>        \
> > -	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))			
>        \
> 
> Can you assign 'enabled' here to hide its usage in the macro ?

 Hi Kuniyuki,

 No Problem, and thanks for your recommendation.
 Version 3 has hide the cgroup_bpf_enabled in macro,
 and fix the coding sytle issue.

 --Tze-nan
>  
> 
> > +	if (enabled)			       \
> >  		copy_from_sockptr(&__ret, optlen, sizeof(int));		
>        \
> >  	__ret;								
>        \
> >  })
> >  
> >  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname,
> optval, optlen,   \
> > -				       max_optlen, retval)		
>        \
> > +				       max_optlen, retval, enabled)	
> 	       \
> >  ({									
>        \
> >  	int __ret = retval;						
>        \
> > -	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) &&			
>        \
> > -	    cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))		
>        \
> > +	if (enabled && cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock,
> CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT))		    \
> >  		if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt ||		
>        \
> >  		    !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot-
> >bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> >  					tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt,	
>        \
> > @@ -518,9 +517,9 @@ static inline int
> bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
> >  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SOCK_OPS(sock_ops) ({ 0; })
> >  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_DEVICE_CGROUP(atype, major, minor,
> access) ({ 0; })
> >  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SYSCTL(head,table,write,buf,count,pos)
> ({ 0; })
> > -#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen) ({ 0; })
> > +#define BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen, enabled) ({ 0; })
> >  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname,
> optval, \
> > -				       optlen, max_optlen, retval) ({
> retval; })
> > +				       optlen, max_optlen, retval,
> enabled) ({ retval; })
> >  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT_KERN(sock, level, optname,
> optval, \
> >  					    optlen, retval) ({ retval;
> })
> >  #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_SETSOCKOPT(sock, level, optname,
> optval, optlen, \
> > diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> > index fcbdd5bc47ac..5336a2755bb4 100644
> > --- a/net/socket.c
> > +++ b/net/socket.c
> > @@ -2365,13 +2365,16 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> bool compat, int level,
> >  	int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
> >  	const struct proto_ops *ops;
> >  	int err;
> > +	bool enabled;
> 
> Please keep reverse xmas tree order.
> 
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#local-variable-ordering-reverse-xmas-tree-rcs
> 
> 
> >  
> >  	err = security_socket_getsockopt(sock, level, optname);
> >  	if (err)
> >  		return err;
> >  
> > -	if (!compat)
> > -		max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
> > +	if (!compat) {
> > +		enabled = cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT);
> > +		max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen,
> enabled);
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
> >  	if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
> > @@ -2390,7 +2393,7 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> bool compat, int level,
> >  	if (!compat)
> >  		err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock->sk, level,
> optname,
> >  						     optval, optlen,
> max_optlen,
> > -						     err);
> > +						     err, enabled);
> >  
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 2.45.2
>