kernel/kthread.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
It was reported that during cpu hotplug test, the following
error was triggered:
do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at kthread_worker_fn (kernel/kthread.c:?)
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 674 at kernel/sched/core.c:8469 __might_sleep
handle_bug
exc_invalid_op
asm_exc_invalid_op
__might_sleep
__might_sleep
kthread_worker_fn
kthread_worker_fn
kthread
__cfi_kthread_worker_fn
ret_from_fork
__cfi_kthread
ret_from_fork_asm
Peter pointed out that there is a race condition when the kworker is being
frozen and falls into try_to_freeze() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, which
triggeres the warning.
Fix this by explicitly set the TASK_RUNNING before entering try_to_freeze().
Fixes: b56c0d8937e6 ("kthread: implement kthread_worker")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202408161619.9ed8b83e-lkp@intel.com
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
kernel/kthread.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index f7be976ff88a..06ab3ada9cf1 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -848,6 +848,12 @@ int kthread_worker_fn(void *worker_ptr)
} else if (!freezing(current))
schedule();
+ /*
+ * Explicitly set the running state in case we are being
+ * frozen and skip the schedule() above. try_to_freeze()
+ * expects the current task to be in the running state.
+ */
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
try_to_freeze();
cond_resched();
goto repeat;
--
2.25.1
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:15:51 +0800 Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> It was reported that during cpu hotplug test, the following
> error was triggered:
>
> do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at kthread_worker_fn (kernel/kthread.c:?)
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 674 at kernel/sched/core.c:8469 __might_sleep
>
> handle_bug
> exc_invalid_op
> asm_exc_invalid_op
> __might_sleep
> __might_sleep
> kthread_worker_fn
> kthread_worker_fn
> kthread
> __cfi_kthread_worker_fn
> ret_from_fork
> __cfi_kthread
> ret_from_fork_asm
>
> Peter pointed out that there is a race condition when the kworker is being
> frozen and falls into try_to_freeze() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, which
> triggeres the warning.
OK. A full description of this race would be better than simply
asserting that it exists, please.
> Fix this by explicitly set the TASK_RUNNING before entering try_to_freeze().
OK.
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -848,6 +848,12 @@ int kthread_worker_fn(void *worker_ptr)
> } else if (!freezing(current))
> schedule();
>
> + /*
> + * Explicitly set the running state in case we are being
> + * frozen and skip the schedule() above. try_to_freeze()
> + * expects the current task to be in the running state.
> + */
> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> try_to_freeze();
> cond_resched();
> goto repeat;
Comment is helpful, but why express in a comment that which can be
expressed in code?
--- a/kernel/kthread.c~kthread-fix-task-state-in-kthread-worker-if-being-frozen
+++ a/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -847,6 +847,12 @@ repeat:
trace_sched_kthread_work_execute_end(work, func);
} else if (!freezing(current))
schedule();
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Handle the case where X happens
+ */
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ }
try_to_freeze();
cond_resched();
_
Hi Andrew,
On 2024-08-19 at 18:58:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:15:51 +0800 Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > It was reported that during cpu hotplug test, the following
> > error was triggered:
> >
> > do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at kthread_worker_fn (kernel/kthread.c:?)
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 674 at kernel/sched/core.c:8469 __might_sleep
> >
> > handle_bug
> > exc_invalid_op
> > asm_exc_invalid_op
> > __might_sleep
> > __might_sleep
> > kthread_worker_fn
> > kthread_worker_fn
> > kthread
> > __cfi_kthread_worker_fn
> > ret_from_fork
> > __cfi_kthread
> > ret_from_fork_asm
> >
> > Peter pointed out that there is a race condition when the kworker is being
> > frozen and falls into try_to_freeze() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, which
> > triggeres the warning.
>
> OK. A full description of this race would be better than simply
> asserting that it exists, please.
>
OK, will write a description for this.
> > Fix this by explicitly set the TASK_RUNNING before entering try_to_freeze().
>
> OK.
>
> > --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> > @@ -848,6 +848,12 @@ int kthread_worker_fn(void *worker_ptr)
> > } else if (!freezing(current))
> > schedule();
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Explicitly set the running state in case we are being
> > + * frozen and skip the schedule() above. try_to_freeze()
> > + * expects the current task to be in the running state.
> > + */
> > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > try_to_freeze();
> > cond_resched();
> > goto repeat;
>
> Comment is helpful, but why express in a comment that which can be
> expressed in code?
>
OK, will do in next version.
thanks,
Chenyu
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c~kthread-fix-task-state-in-kthread-worker-if-being-frozen
> +++ a/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -847,6 +847,12 @@ repeat:
> trace_sched_kthread_work_execute_end(work, func);
> } else if (!freezing(current))
> schedule();
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Handle the case where X happens
> + */
> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> + }
>
> try_to_freeze();
> cond_resched();
> _
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.