ARM: Fix license and copyright texts

[PATCH 09/10] ARM: dts: tqmls1021: change licenses to use the same as ls1021a

Posted by Max Merchel 1 year, 6 months ago

commit 784bdc6f2697c ("ARM: dts: ls1021a: change to use SPDX identifiers")
license of imx7sls1021a.dtsi changed to
"GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT license."
Therefore, the licenses of the tqmls1021 device tree are changed to the
same licenses.

Signed-off-by: Max Merchel <Max.Merchel@ew.tq-group.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls1021a.dts | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a.dtsi          | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls1021a.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls1021a.dts
index 34636fcdfd6a..d441a67fb4ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls1021a.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a-mbls1021a.dts
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR X11)
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
 /*
  * Copyright 2013-2014 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
  * Copyright 2018-2023 TQ-Systems GmbH <linux@ew.tq-group.com>,
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a.dtsi
index 1b13851ad997..2f9387c34ca3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-tqmls1021a.dtsi
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-or-later OR X11)
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
 /*
  * Copyright 2013-2014 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
  * Copyright 2018-2023 TQ-Systems GmbH <linux@ew.tq-group.com>,
-- 
2.33.0

Re: [PATCH 09/10] ARM: dts: tqmls1021: change licenses to use the same as ls1021a

Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 year, 6 months ago

On 13/08/2024 09:16, Max Merchel wrote:
> commit 784bdc6f2697c ("ARM: dts: ls1021a: change to use SPDX identifiers")
> license of imx7sls1021a.dtsi changed to
> "GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT license."

No, that is not true. License did not change. It was exactly the same.
Read carefully the commit.

NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof