drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
sparse reported following warnings:
'''
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:5517:32: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:5526:32: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
'''
This patch chanes integer 0 to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Dipendra Khadka <kdipendra88@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 69a5249e007a..7f012ba3edb2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -5514,7 +5514,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_perform_vport_cvl(struct lpfc_vport *vport)
/* Cannot find existing Fabric ndlp, so allocate a new one */
ndlp = lpfc_nlp_init(vport, Fabric_DID);
if (!ndlp)
- return 0;
+ return NULL;
/* Set the node type */
ndlp->nlp_type |= NLP_FABRIC;
/* Put ndlp onto node list */
@@ -5523,7 +5523,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_perform_vport_cvl(struct lpfc_vport *vport)
/* re-setup ndlp without removing from node list */
ndlp = lpfc_enable_node(vport, ndlp, NLP_STE_UNUSED_NODE);
if (!ndlp)
- return 0;
+ return NULL;
}
if ((phba->pport->port_state < LPFC_FLOGI) &&
(phba->pport->port_state != LPFC_VPORT_FAILED))
--
2.43.0
Hi Dipendra,
Perhaps the branch being referred to is out of date?
This has already been addressed in the following commit.
commit 5860d9fb5622ecd79913ac981403c612f6c8a2d8
Author: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Sep 25 23:41:13 2021 +0100
scsi: lpfc: Return NULL rather than a plain 0 integer
Function lpfc_sli4_perform_vport_cvl() returns a pointer to struct
lpfc_nodelist so returning a plain 0 integer isn't good practice. Fix this
by returning a NULL instead.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210925224113.183040-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com
And, the routine called lpfc_enable_node doesn’t exist anymore.
Regards,
Justin Tee
Hi Justin, On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 22:09, Justin Tee <justintee8345@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Dipendra, > > Perhaps the branch being referred to is out of date? > Sorry, you are right. It is due to the branch mismatching. > This has already been addressed in the following commit. > > commit 5860d9fb5622ecd79913ac981403c612f6c8a2d8 > Author: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> > Date: Sat Sep 25 23:41:13 2021 +0100 > > scsi: lpfc: Return NULL rather than a plain 0 integer > > Function lpfc_sli4_perform_vport_cvl() returns a pointer to struct > lpfc_nodelist so returning a plain 0 integer isn't good practice. Fix this > by returning a NULL instead. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210925224113.183040-1-colin.king@canonical.com > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com > > > And, the routine called lpfc_enable_node doesn’t exist anymore. > > Regards, > Justin Tee Best Regard, Dipendra Khadka
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.