---
 drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h b/drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fc9bbb989144
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * NXP Wireless LAN device driver: WMM
+ *
+ * Copyright 2011-2024 NXP
+ */
+
+#ifndef _NXPWIFI_WMM_H_
+#define _NXPWIFI_WMM_H_
+
+enum ieee_types_wmm_aciaifsn_bitmasks {
+	NXPWIFI_AIFSN = (BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(3)),
+	NXPWIFI_ACM = BIT(4),
+	NXPWIFI_ACI = (BIT(5) | BIT(6)),
+};
+
+enum ieee_types_wmm_ecw_bitmasks {
+	NXPWIFI_ECW_MIN = (BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(3)),
+	NXPWIFI_ECW_MAX = (BIT(4) | BIT(5) | BIT(6) | BIT(7)),
+};
+
+extern const u16 nxpwifi_1d_to_wmm_queue[];
+extern const u8 tos_to_tid_inv[];
+
+/* This function retrieves the TID of the given RA list.
+ */
+static inline int
+nxpwifi_get_tid(struct nxpwifi_ra_list_tbl *ptr)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	if (skb_queue_empty(&ptr->skb_head))
+		return 0;
+
+	skb = skb_peek(&ptr->skb_head);
+
+	return skb->priority;
+}
+
+void nxpwifi_wmm_add_buf_txqueue(struct nxpwifi_private *priv,
+				 struct sk_buff *skb);
+void nxpwifi_wmm_add_buf_bypass_txqueue(struct nxpwifi_private *priv,
+					struct sk_buff *skb);
+void nxpwifi_ralist_add(struct nxpwifi_private *priv, const u8 *ra);
+void nxpwifi_rotate_priolists(struct nxpwifi_private *priv,
+			      struct nxpwifi_ra_list_tbl *ra, int tid);
+
+bool nxpwifi_wmm_lists_empty(struct nxpwifi_adapter *adapter);
+bool nxpwifi_bypass_txlist_empty(struct nxpwifi_adapter *adapter);
+void nxpwifi_wmm_process_tx(struct nxpwifi_adapter *adapter);
+void nxpwifi_process_bypass_tx(struct nxpwifi_adapter *adapter);
+bool nxpwifi_is_ralist_valid(struct nxpwifi_private *priv,
+			     struct nxpwifi_ra_list_tbl *ra_list, int tid);
+
+u8 nxpwifi_wmm_compute_drv_pkt_delay(struct nxpwifi_private *priv,
+				     const struct sk_buff *skb);
+void nxpwifi_wmm_init(struct nxpwifi_adapter *adapter);
+
+u32 nxpwifi_wmm_process_association_req(struct nxpwifi_private *priv,
+					u8 **assoc_buf,
+					struct ieee80211_wmm_param_ie *wmmie,
+					struct ieee80211_ht_cap *htcap);
+
+void nxpwifi_wmm_setup_queue_priorities(struct nxpwifi_private *priv,
+					struct ieee80211_wmm_param_ie *wmm_ie);
+void nxpwifi_wmm_setup_ac_downgrade(struct nxpwifi_private *priv);
+int nxpwifi_ret_wmm_get_status(struct nxpwifi_private *priv,
+			       const struct host_cmd_ds_command *resp);
+struct nxpwifi_ra_list_tbl *
+nxpwifi_wmm_get_queue_raptr(struct nxpwifi_private *priv, u8 tid,
+			    const u8 *ra_addr);
+u8 nxpwifi_wmm_downgrade_tid(struct nxpwifi_private *priv, u32 tid);
+void nxpwifi_update_ralist_tx_pause(struct nxpwifi_private *priv, u8 *mac,
+				    u8 tx_pause);
+
+struct nxpwifi_ra_list_tbl *nxpwifi_wmm_get_ralist_node(struct nxpwifi_private
+					*priv, u8 tid, const u8 *ra_addr);
+#endif /* !_NXPWIFI_WMM_H_ */
-- 
2.34.1

On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 05:45:30PM +0800, David Lin wrote:
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/nxp/nxpwifi/wmm.h


Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend
  it after adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of
  the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
  email signature.

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in
  order to properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper
  Subject: line should look like.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot