[PATCH -next] pwm: lp3943: Fix an incorrect type in lp3943_pwm_parse_dt()

Jiapeng Chong posted 1 patch 1 year, 6 months ago
drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH -next] pwm: lp3943: Fix an incorrect type in lp3943_pwm_parse_dt()
Posted by Jiapeng Chong 1 year, 6 months ago
The return value from the call to of_property_count_u32_elems() is int.
However, the return value is being assigned to an u32 variable
'num_outputs', so making 'num_outputs' an int.

./drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c:238:6-17: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: num_outputs <= 0.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9710
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c
index f0e94c9e5956..90b0733c00c1 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c
@@ -218,8 +218,7 @@ static int lp3943_pwm_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
 	struct lp3943_platform_data *pdata;
 	struct lp3943_pwm_map *pwm_map;
 	enum lp3943_pwm_output *output;
-	int i, err, count = 0;
-	u32 num_outputs;
+	int i, err, num_outputs, count = 0;
 
 	if (!node)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
Re: [PATCH -next] pwm: lp3943: Fix an incorrect type in lp3943_pwm_parse_dt()
Posted by Uwe Kleine-König 1 year, 6 months ago
Hello Jiapeng,

On 8/9/24 10:05, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> The return value from the call to of_property_count_u32_elems() is int.
> However, the return value is being assigned to an u32 variable
> 'num_outputs', so making 'num_outputs' an int.
> 
> ./drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c:238:6-17: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: num_outputs <= 0.

Which tool does emit this warning? My test build (with C=1 and W=1) 
doesn't emit it.

> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9710
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>

This problem was introduced in a commit in next:

Fixes: d6a56f3bb650 ("pwm: lp3943: Use of_property_count_u32_elems() to 
get property length")

Rob: I guess this wasn't the only conversion of this type. Maybe these 
others suffer from the same problem?!

> ---
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c
> index f0e94c9e5956..90b0733c00c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c
> @@ -218,8 +218,7 @@ static int lp3943_pwm_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
>   	struct lp3943_platform_data *pdata;
>   	struct lp3943_pwm_map *pwm_map;
>   	enum lp3943_pwm_output *output;
> -	int i, err, count = 0;
> -	u32 num_outputs;
> +	int i, err, num_outputs, count = 0;
>   
>   	if (!node)
>   		return -EINVAL;

Nitpick (maybe even a subjective one):
While touching num_outputs, its scope could be reduced to the for loop.

Best regards
Uwe
Re: [PATCH -next] pwm: lp3943: Fix an incorrect type in lp3943_pwm_parse_dt()
Posted by Uwe Kleine-König 1 year, 6 months ago
Hello,

On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 10:50:49AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On 8/9/24 10:05, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> > The return value from the call to of_property_count_u32_elems() is int.
> > However, the return value is being assigned to an u32 variable
> > 'num_outputs', so making 'num_outputs' an int.
> > 
> > ./drivers/pwm/pwm-lp3943.c:238:6-17: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: num_outputs <= 0.
> 
> Which tool does emit this warning? My test build (with C=1 and W=1) doesn't
> emit it.
> 
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9710
> > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> This problem was introduced in a commit in next:
> 
> Fixes: d6a56f3bb650 ("pwm: lp3943: Use of_property_count_u32_elems() to get
> property length")
> 
> Rob: I guess this wasn't the only conversion of this type. Maybe these
> others suffer from the same problem?!

I hoped for some more feedback, but anyhow: Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next

with the Fixes line.

Best regards
Uwe