drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Using FIELD_GET() fails in configurations that don't already include
the header file indirectly:
drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c: In function 'tps23881_i2c_probe':
drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c:755:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
755 | if (FIELD_GET(TPS23881_REG_DEVID_MASK, ret) != TPS23881_DEVICE_ID) {
| ^~~~~~~~~
Fixes: 89108cb5c285 ("net: pse-pd: tps23881: Fix the device ID check")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
index f90db758554b..2ea75686a319 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
* Copyright (c) 2023 Bootlin, Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
*/
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
--
2.39.2
Hi Arnd,
Thank you for your patch.
I acked already other one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240807071538.569784-1-guanjun@linux.alibaba.com/
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Using FIELD_GET() fails in configurations that don't already include
> the header file indirectly:
>
> drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c: In function 'tps23881_i2c_probe':
> drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c:755:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 755 | if (FIELD_GET(TPS23881_REG_DEVID_MASK, ret) != TPS23881_DEVICE_ID) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~
>
> Fixes: 89108cb5c285 ("net: pse-pd: tps23881: Fix the device ID check")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:13:48 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > I acked already other one: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240807071538.569784-1-guanjun@linux.alibaba.com/ Thanks for the note, I totally missed the other patch scanning for just fixes before the downstream PR. I prefer Arnd's fix TBH, apart from not having the wrong tree in the subject - the fixes tag is correctly formatted and includes are kept alphabetical. I'll "move" your ack here, hope that's fine.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.