rust/Makefile | 4 ++-- rust/compiler_builtins.rs | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Alice reported [1] that an arm64 build failed with:
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __extendsfdf2
>>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
>>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
>>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __truncdfsf2
>>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
>>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
Rust 1.80.0 or later together with `CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y`
is what triggers it.
In addition, x86_64 builds also fail the same way.
Similarly, compiling with Rust 1.82.0 (currently in nightly) makes
another one appear, possibly due to the LLVM 19 upgrade there:
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __eqdf2
>>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
>>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_up) in archive vmlinux.a
>>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
>>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_down) in archive vmlinux.a
Gary adds [1]:
> Usually the fix on rustc side is to mark those functions as `#[inline]`
>
> All of {midpoint,next_up,next_down} are indeed unstable functions not
> marked as inline...
Fix all those by adding those intrinsics to our usual workaround.
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/288089-General/topic/v6.2E11-rc1.20doesn't.20build.20for.20arm64/near/455637364
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
---
rust/Makefile | 4 ++--
rust/compiler_builtins.rs | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/Makefile b/rust/Makefile
index 1f10f92737f2..77836388377d 100644
--- a/rust/Makefile
+++ b/rust/Makefile
@@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ rust-analyzer:
$(if $(KBUILD_EXTMOD),$(extmod_prefix),$(objtree))/rust-project.json
redirect-intrinsics = \
- __addsf3 __eqsf2 __gesf2 __lesf2 __ltsf2 __mulsf3 __nesf2 __unordsf2 \
- __adddf3 __ledf2 __ltdf2 __muldf3 __unorddf2 \
+ __addsf3 __eqsf2 __extendsfdf2 __gesf2 __lesf2 __ltsf2 __mulsf3 __nesf2 __truncdfsf2 __unordsf2 \
+ __adddf3 __eqdf2 __ledf2 __ltdf2 __muldf3 __unorddf2 \
__muloti4 __multi3 \
__udivmodti4 __udivti3 __umodti3
diff --git a/rust/compiler_builtins.rs b/rust/compiler_builtins.rs
index bba2922c6ef7..f14b8d7caf89 100644
--- a/rust/compiler_builtins.rs
+++ b/rust/compiler_builtins.rs
@@ -40,16 +40,19 @@ pub extern "C" fn $ident() {
define_panicking_intrinsics!("`f32` should not be used", {
__addsf3,
__eqsf2,
+ __extendsfdf2,
__gesf2,
__lesf2,
__ltsf2,
__mulsf3,
__nesf2,
+ __truncdfsf2,
__unordsf2,
});
define_panicking_intrinsics!("`f64` should not be used", {
__adddf3,
+ __eqdf2,
__ledf2,
__ltdf2,
__muldf3,
base-commit: de9c2c66ad8e787abec7c9d7eff4f8c3cdd28aed
--
2.46.0
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:06 PM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Alice reported [1] that an arm64 build failed with:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __extendsfdf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __truncdfsf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Rust 1.80.0 or later together with `CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y`
> is what triggers it.
>
> In addition, x86_64 builds also fail the same way.
>
> Similarly, compiling with Rust 1.82.0 (currently in nightly) makes
> another one appear, possibly due to the LLVM 19 upgrade there:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __eqdf2
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_up) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_down) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Gary adds [1]:
>
> > Usually the fix on rustc side is to mark those functions as `#[inline]`
> >
> > All of {midpoint,next_up,next_down} are indeed unstable functions not
> > marked as inline...
>
> Fix all those by adding those intrinsics to our usual workaround.
>
> Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/288089-General/topic/v6.2E11-rc1.20doesn't.20build.20for.20arm64/near/455637364
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Applied to `rust-fixes` -- thanks everyone!
[ Trevor quickly submitted a fix to upstream Rust [2] that has already
been merged, to be released in Rust 1.82.0 (2024-10-17). - Miguel ]
[ Shortened Zulip link. - Miguel ]
Cheers,
Miguel
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:06:19 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> wrote:
> Alice reported [1] that an arm64 build failed with:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __extendsfdf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __truncdfsf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Rust 1.80.0 or later together with `CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y`
> is what triggers it.
>
> In addition, x86_64 builds also fail the same way.
>
> Similarly, compiling with Rust 1.82.0 (currently in nightly) makes
> another one appear, possibly due to the LLVM 19 upgrade there:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __eqdf2
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_up) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_down) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Gary adds [1]:
>
> > Usually the fix on rustc side is to mark those functions as `#[inline]`
> >
> > All of {midpoint,next_up,next_down} are indeed unstable functions not
> > marked as inline...
>
> Fix all those by adding those intrinsics to our usual workaround.
>
> Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/288089-General/topic/v6.2E11-rc1.20doesn't.20build.20for.20arm64/near/455637364
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> ---
> rust/Makefile | 4 ++--
> rust/compiler_builtins.rs | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:06 AM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Alice reported [1] that an arm64 build failed with:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __extendsfdf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __truncdfsf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Rust 1.80.0 or later together with `CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y`
> is what triggers it.
>
> In addition, x86_64 builds also fail the same way.
>
> Similarly, compiling with Rust 1.82.0 (currently in nightly) makes
> another one appear, possibly due to the LLVM 19 upgrade there:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __eqdf2
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_up) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_down) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Gary adds [1]:
>
> > Usually the fix on rustc side is to mark those functions as `#[inline]`
> >
> > All of {midpoint,next_up,next_down} are indeed unstable functions not
> > marked as inline...
>
> Fix all those by adding those intrinsics to our usual workaround.
>
> Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/288089-General/topic/v6.2E11-rc1.20doesn't.20build.20for.20arm64/near/455637364
Should this link have the `[1]`?
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> ---
> rust/Makefile | 4 ++--
> rust/compiler_builtins.rs | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Also submitted a fix upstream https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128749.
- Trevor
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 8:30 PM Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> wrote: > > Should this link have the `[1]`? Yeah, good eyes :) > Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> > > Also submitted a fix upstream https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128749. Thanks a lot! Linked in the `core` sublist in issue #2. Cheers, Miguel
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:06:19PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Alice reported [1] that an arm64 build failed with:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __extendsfdf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __truncdfsf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Rust 1.80.0 or later together with `CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y`
> is what triggers it.
>
> In addition, x86_64 builds also fail the same way.
>
> Similarly, compiling with Rust 1.82.0 (currently in nightly) makes
> another one appear, possibly due to the LLVM 19 upgrade there:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __eqdf2
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_up) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_down) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Gary adds [1]:
>
> > Usually the fix on rustc side is to mark those functions as `#[inline]`
> >
> > All of {midpoint,next_up,next_down} are indeed unstable functions not
> > marked as inline...
>
> Fix all those by adding those intrinsics to our usual workaround.
>
> Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/288089-General/topic/v6.2E11-rc1.20doesn't.20build.20for.20arm64/near/455637364
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Put this one into rust-dev and confirm this could fix the issue with
Rust 1.80. I also add a test with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y in my
rust-dev script, so we can catch the similar issues earlier.
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Regards,
Boqun
> ---
> rust/Makefile | 4 ++--
> rust/compiler_builtins.rs | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/Makefile b/rust/Makefile
> index 1f10f92737f2..77836388377d 100644
> --- a/rust/Makefile
> +++ b/rust/Makefile
> @@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ rust-analyzer:
> $(if $(KBUILD_EXTMOD),$(extmod_prefix),$(objtree))/rust-project.json
>
> redirect-intrinsics = \
> - __addsf3 __eqsf2 __gesf2 __lesf2 __ltsf2 __mulsf3 __nesf2 __unordsf2 \
> - __adddf3 __ledf2 __ltdf2 __muldf3 __unorddf2 \
> + __addsf3 __eqsf2 __extendsfdf2 __gesf2 __lesf2 __ltsf2 __mulsf3 __nesf2 __truncdfsf2 __unordsf2 \
> + __adddf3 __eqdf2 __ledf2 __ltdf2 __muldf3 __unorddf2 \
> __muloti4 __multi3 \
> __udivmodti4 __udivti3 __umodti3
>
> diff --git a/rust/compiler_builtins.rs b/rust/compiler_builtins.rs
> index bba2922c6ef7..f14b8d7caf89 100644
> --- a/rust/compiler_builtins.rs
> +++ b/rust/compiler_builtins.rs
> @@ -40,16 +40,19 @@ pub extern "C" fn $ident() {
> define_panicking_intrinsics!("`f32` should not be used", {
> __addsf3,
> __eqsf2,
> + __extendsfdf2,
> __gesf2,
> __lesf2,
> __ltsf2,
> __mulsf3,
> __nesf2,
> + __truncdfsf2,
> __unordsf2,
> });
>
> define_panicking_intrinsics!("`f64` should not be used", {
> __adddf3,
> + __eqdf2,
> __ledf2,
> __ltdf2,
> __muldf3,
>
> base-commit: de9c2c66ad8e787abec7c9d7eff4f8c3cdd28aed
> --
> 2.46.0
>
>
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 7:28 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> wrote: > > Put this one into rust-dev and confirm this could fix the issue with > Rust 1.80. I also add a test with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y in my > rust-dev script, so we can catch the similar issues earlier. +1, same on my side. Cheers, Miguel
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:06 PM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Alice reported [1] that an arm64 build failed with:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __extendsfdf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __truncdfsf2
> >>> referenced by core.a6f5fc5794e7b7b3-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f32>::midpoint) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Rust 1.80.0 or later together with `CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y`
> is what triggers it.
>
> In addition, x86_64 builds also fail the same way.
>
> Similarly, compiling with Rust 1.82.0 (currently in nightly) makes
> another one appear, possibly due to the LLVM 19 upgrade there:
>
> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __eqdf2
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_up) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by core.20495ea57a9f069d-cgu.0
> >>> rust/core.o:(<f64>::next_down) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Gary adds [1]:
>
> > Usually the fix on rustc side is to mark those functions as `#[inline]`
> >
> > All of {midpoint,next_up,next_down} are indeed unstable functions not
> > marked as inline...
>
> Fix all those by adding those intrinsics to our usual workaround.
>
> Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/288089-General/topic/v6.2E11-rc1.20doesn't.20build.20for.20arm64/near/455637364
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
This fixes the issue I ran into.
Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.