drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On some newer laptops it appears that an AMD driver can register a
platform_profile handler. If this happens then the asus_wmi driver would
error with -EEXIST when trying to register its own handler leaving the
user with a possibly unusable system - this is especially true for
laptops with an MCU that emit a stream of HID packets, some of which can
be misinterpreted as shutdown signals.
We can safely continue loading the driver instead of bombing out.
Signed-off-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@ljones.dev>
---
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
index cc5dc296fb2d..2fdfa84f7efb 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
@@ -3897,8 +3897,13 @@ static int platform_profile_setup(struct asus_wmi *asus)
asus->platform_profile_handler.choices);
err = platform_profile_register(&asus->platform_profile_handler);
- if (err)
+ if (err == -EEXIST) {
+ pr_warn("A platform_profile handler is already registered, this may be a driver conflict.\n");
+ return 0;
+ } else if (err) {
+ pr_err("Failed to register platform_profile: %d\n", err);
return err;
+ }
asus->platform_profile_support = true;
return 0;
@@ -4773,7 +4778,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_add(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto fail_fan_boost_mode;
err = platform_profile_setup(asus);
- if (err)
+ if (err && err != -EEXIST)
goto fail_platform_profile_setup;
err = asus_wmi_sysfs_init(asus->platform_device);
--
2.45.2
Hi Luke, On 8/6/24 1:58 AM, Luke D. Jones wrote: > On some newer laptops it appears that an AMD driver can register a > platform_profile handler. If this happens then the asus_wmi driver would > error with -EEXIST when trying to register its own handler leaving the > user with a possibly unusable system - this is especially true for > laptops with an MCU that emit a stream of HID packets, some of which can > be misinterpreted as shutdown signals. > > We can safely continue loading the driver instead of bombing out. > > Signed-off-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@ljones.dev> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c > index cc5dc296fb2d..2fdfa84f7efb 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c > @@ -3897,8 +3897,13 @@ static int platform_profile_setup(struct asus_wmi *asus) > asus->platform_profile_handler.choices); > > err = platform_profile_register(&asus->platform_profile_handler); > - if (err) > + if (err == -EEXIST) { > + pr_warn("A platform_profile handler is already registered, this may be a driver conflict.\n"); > + return 0; > + } else if (err) { > + pr_err("Failed to register platform_profile: %d\n", err); > return err; > + } > > asus->platform_profile_support = true; > return 0; > @@ -4773,7 +4778,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_add(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto fail_fan_boost_mode; > > err = platform_profile_setup(asus); > - if (err) > + if (err && err != -EEXIST) > goto fail_platform_profile_setup; Since you already do "return 0" on EEXIST in platform_profile_setup() there is no need for this part of the patch. Regards, Hans > > err = asus_wmi_sysfs_init(asus->platform_device);
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.