The buffer size histograms in smc_stats, namely rx/tx_rmbsize, record
the sizes of ringbufs for all connections that have ever appeared in
the net namespace. They are incremental and we cannot know the actual
ringbufs usage from these. So here introduces statistics for current
ringbufs usage of existing smc connections in the net namespace into
smc_stats, it will be incremented when new connection uses a ringbuf
and decremented when the ringbuf is unused.
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/smc.h | 2 ++
net/smc/smc_core.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
net/smc/smc_stats.c | 8 ++++++++
net/smc/smc_stats.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/smc.h b/include/uapi/linux/smc.h
index d27b8dc50f90..304e202c03bb 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/smc.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/smc.h
@@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ enum {
SMC_NLA_STATS_T_TX_BYTES, /* u64 */
SMC_NLA_STATS_T_RX_CNT, /* u64 */
SMC_NLA_STATS_T_TX_CNT, /* u64 */
+ SMC_NLA_STATS_T_RX_RMB_USAGE, /* u64 */
+ SMC_NLA_STATS_T_TX_RMB_USAGE, /* u64 */
__SMC_NLA_STATS_T_MAX,
SMC_NLA_STATS_T_MAX = __SMC_NLA_STATS_T_MAX - 1
};
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index 73c7999fc74f..f0e08ed9b434 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -1209,22 +1209,30 @@ static void smcd_buf_detach(struct smc_connection *conn)
static void smc_buf_unuse(struct smc_connection *conn,
struct smc_link_group *lgr)
{
+ struct smc_sock *smc = container_of(conn, struct smc_sock, conn);
+ bool is_smcd = lgr->is_smcd;
+ int bufsize;
+
if (conn->sndbuf_desc) {
- if (!lgr->is_smcd && conn->sndbuf_desc->is_vm) {
+ bufsize = conn->sndbuf_desc->len;
+ if (!is_smcd && conn->sndbuf_desc->is_vm) {
smcr_buf_unuse(conn->sndbuf_desc, false, lgr);
} else {
- memzero_explicit(conn->sndbuf_desc->cpu_addr, conn->sndbuf_desc->len);
+ memzero_explicit(conn->sndbuf_desc->cpu_addr, bufsize);
WRITE_ONCE(conn->sndbuf_desc->used, 0);
}
+ SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(smc, is_smcd, false, false, bufsize);
}
if (conn->rmb_desc) {
- if (!lgr->is_smcd) {
+ bufsize = conn->rmb_desc->len;
+ if (!is_smcd) {
smcr_buf_unuse(conn->rmb_desc, true, lgr);
} else {
- memzero_explicit(conn->rmb_desc->cpu_addr,
- conn->rmb_desc->len + sizeof(struct smcd_cdc_msg));
+ bufsize += sizeof(struct smcd_cdc_msg);
+ memzero_explicit(conn->rmb_desc->cpu_addr, bufsize);
WRITE_ONCE(conn->rmb_desc->used, 0);
}
+ SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(smc, is_smcd, true, false, bufsize);
}
}
@@ -2433,7 +2441,7 @@ static int __smc_buf_create(struct smc_sock *smc, bool is_smcd, bool is_rmb)
buf_desc = smc_buf_get_slot(bufsize_comp, lock, buf_list);
if (buf_desc) {
buf_desc->is_dma_need_sync = 0;
- SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(smc, is_smcd, is_rmb, bufsize);
+ SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(smc, is_smcd, is_rmb, true, bufsize);
SMC_STAT_BUF_REUSE(smc, is_smcd, is_rmb);
break; /* found reusable slot */
}
@@ -2454,7 +2462,7 @@ static int __smc_buf_create(struct smc_sock *smc, bool is_smcd, bool is_rmb)
}
SMC_STAT_RMB_ALLOC(smc, is_smcd, is_rmb);
- SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(smc, is_smcd, is_rmb, bufsize);
+ SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(smc, is_smcd, is_rmb, true, bufsize);
buf_desc->used = 1;
down_write(lock);
smc_lgr_buf_list_add(lgr, is_rmb, buf_list, buf_desc);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.c b/net/smc/smc_stats.c
index ca14c0f3a07d..3f2ebc6c06ba 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_stats.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_stats.c
@@ -218,6 +218,14 @@ static int smc_nl_fill_stats_tech_data(struct sk_buff *skb,
smc_tech->tx_bytes,
SMC_NLA_STATS_PAD))
goto errattr;
+ if (nla_put_u64_64bit(skb, SMC_NLA_STATS_T_RX_RMB_USAGE,
+ smc_tech->rx_rmbuse,
+ SMC_NLA_STATS_PAD))
+ goto errattr;
+ if (nla_put_u64_64bit(skb, SMC_NLA_STATS_T_TX_RMB_USAGE,
+ smc_tech->tx_rmbuse,
+ SMC_NLA_STATS_PAD))
+ goto errattr;
if (nla_put_u64_64bit(skb, SMC_NLA_STATS_T_RX_CNT,
smc_tech->rx_cnt,
SMC_NLA_STATS_PAD))
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.h b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
index 9d32058db2b5..04110ed359b8 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_stats.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ struct smc_stats_tech {
u64 tx_bytes;
u64 rx_cnt;
u64 tx_cnt;
+ u64 rx_rmbuse;
+ u64 tx_rmbuse;
};
struct smc_stats {
@@ -135,38 +137,45 @@ do { \
} \
while (0)
-#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _len) \
+#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _is_add, _len) \
do { \
+ typeof(_is_add) is_a = (_is_add); \
typeof(_len) _l = (_len); \
typeof(_tech) t = (_tech); \
int _pos; \
int m = SMC_BUF_MAX - 1; \
if (_l <= 0) \
break; \
- _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
- _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
- this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
+ if (is_a) { \
+ _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
+ _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
+ this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
+ this_cpu_add((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbuse, _l); \
+ } else { \
+ this_cpu_sub((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbuse, _l); \
+ } \
} \
while (0)
#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SUB(_smc_stats, type, t, key) \
this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].rmb ## _ ## key.type ## _cnt)
-#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(_smc, _is_smcd, _is_rx, _len) \
+#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(_smc, _is_smcd, _is_rx, _is_add, _len) \
do { \
struct net *_net = sock_net(&(_smc)->sk); \
struct smc_stats __percpu *_smc_stats = _net->smc.smc_stats; \
+ typeof(_is_add) is_add = (_is_add); \
typeof(_is_smcd) is_d = (_is_smcd); \
typeof(_is_rx) is_r = (_is_rx); \
typeof(_len) l = (_len); \
if ((is_d) && (is_r)) \
- SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, rx, l); \
+ SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, rx, is_add, l); \
if ((is_d) && !(is_r)) \
- SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, tx, l); \
+ SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, tx, is_add, l); \
if (!(is_d) && (is_r)) \
- SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, rx, l); \
+ SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, rx, is_add, l); \
if (!(is_d) && !(is_r)) \
- SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, tx, l); \
+ SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, tx, is_add, l); \
} \
while (0)
--
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9fOn Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 05:05:51PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
> The buffer size histograms in smc_stats, namely rx/tx_rmbsize, record
> the sizes of ringbufs for all connections that have ever appeared in
> the net namespace. They are incremental and we cannot know the actual
> ringbufs usage from these. So here introduces statistics for current
> ringbufs usage of existing smc connections in the net namespace into
> smc_stats, it will be incremented when new connection uses a ringbuf
> and decremented when the ringbuf is unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
...
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.h b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
...
> @@ -135,38 +137,45 @@ do { \
> } \
> while (0)
>
> -#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _len) \
> +#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _is_add, _len) \
> do { \
> + typeof(_is_add) is_a = (_is_add); \
> typeof(_len) _l = (_len); \
> typeof(_tech) t = (_tech); \
> int _pos; \
> int m = SMC_BUF_MAX - 1; \
> if (_l <= 0) \
> break; \
> - _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
> - _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
> - this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
> + if (is_a) { \
> + _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
> + _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
> + this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
> + this_cpu_add((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbuse, _l); \
Nit:
I see that due to the construction of the caller, SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(),
it will not occur. But checkpatch warns of possible side effects
from reuse of _smc_stats.
As great care seems to have been taken in these macros to avoid such
problems, even if theoretical, perhaps it is worth doing so here too.
f.e. A macro-local variable could store (*(_smc_stats)).smc[t] which
I think would both resolve the problem mentioned, and make some
lines shorter (and maybe easier to read).
> + } else { \
> + this_cpu_sub((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbuse, _l); \
> + } \
> } \
> while (0)
>
> #define SMC_STAT_RMB_SUB(_smc_stats, type, t, key) \
> this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].rmb ## _ ## key.type ## _cnt)
>
> -#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(_smc, _is_smcd, _is_rx, _len) \
> +#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(_smc, _is_smcd, _is_rx, _is_add, _len) \
> do { \
> struct net *_net = sock_net(&(_smc)->sk); \
> struct smc_stats __percpu *_smc_stats = _net->smc.smc_stats; \
> + typeof(_is_add) is_add = (_is_add); \
> typeof(_is_smcd) is_d = (_is_smcd); \
> typeof(_is_rx) is_r = (_is_rx); \
> typeof(_len) l = (_len); \
> if ((is_d) && (is_r)) \
> - SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, rx, l); \
> + SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, rx, is_add, l); \
> if ((is_d) && !(is_r)) \
> - SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, tx, l); \
> + SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, tx, is_add, l); \
> if (!(is_d) && (is_r)) \
> - SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, rx, l); \
> + SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, rx, is_add, l); \
> if (!(is_d) && !(is_r)) \
> - SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, tx, l); \
> + SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, tx, is_add, l); \
> } \
> while (0)
>
> --
> 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>
>
On 2024/8/6 18:49, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 05:05:51PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
>> The buffer size histograms in smc_stats, namely rx/tx_rmbsize, record
>> the sizes of ringbufs for all connections that have ever appeared in
>> the net namespace. They are incremental and we cannot know the actual
>> ringbufs usage from these. So here introduces statistics for current
>> ringbufs usage of existing smc connections in the net namespace into
>> smc_stats, it will be incremented when new connection uses a ringbuf
>> and decremented when the ringbuf is unused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.h b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -135,38 +137,45 @@ do { \
>> } \
>> while (0)
>>
>> -#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _len) \
>> +#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _is_add, _len) \
>> do { \
>> + typeof(_is_add) is_a = (_is_add); \
>> typeof(_len) _l = (_len); \
>> typeof(_tech) t = (_tech); \
>> int _pos; \
>> int m = SMC_BUF_MAX - 1; \
>> if (_l <= 0) \
>> break; \
>> - _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
>> - _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
>> - this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
>> + if (is_a) { \
>> + _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
>> + _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
>> + this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
>> + this_cpu_add((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbuse, _l); \
>
> Nit:
>
> I see that due to the construction of the caller, SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(),
> it will not occur. But checkpatch warns of possible side effects
> from reuse of _smc_stats.
>
> As great care seems to have been taken in these macros to avoid such
> problems, even if theoretical, perhaps it is worth doing so here too.
>
> f.e. A macro-local variable could store (*(_smc_stats)).smc[t] which
> I think would both resolve the problem mentioned, and make some
> lines shorter (and maybe easier to read).
>
It makes sense. I will use a macro-local variable of smc_stats. Thank you!
>> + } else { \
>> + this_cpu_sub((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbuse, _l); \
>> + } \
>> } \
>> while (0)
>>
>> #define SMC_STAT_RMB_SUB(_smc_stats, type, t, key) \
>> this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].rmb ## _ ## key.type ## _cnt)
>>
>> -#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(_smc, _is_smcd, _is_rx, _len) \
>> +#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(_smc, _is_smcd, _is_rx, _is_add, _len) \
>> do { \
>> struct net *_net = sock_net(&(_smc)->sk); \
>> struct smc_stats __percpu *_smc_stats = _net->smc.smc_stats; \
>> + typeof(_is_add) is_add = (_is_add); \
>> typeof(_is_smcd) is_d = (_is_smcd); \
>> typeof(_is_rx) is_r = (_is_rx); \
>> typeof(_len) l = (_len); \
>> if ((is_d) && (is_r)) \
>> - SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, rx, l); \
>> + SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, rx, is_add, l); \
>> if ((is_d) && !(is_r)) \
>> - SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, tx, l); \
>> + SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_D, tx, is_add, l); \
>> if (!(is_d) && (is_r)) \
>> - SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, rx, l); \
>> + SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, rx, is_add, l); \
>> if (!(is_d) && !(is_r)) \
>> - SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, tx, l); \
>> + SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, SMC_TYPE_R, tx, is_add, l); \
>> } \
>> while (0)
>>
>> --
>> 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>>
>>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 09:07:40PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/8/6 18:49, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 05:05:51PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
> > > The buffer size histograms in smc_stats, namely rx/tx_rmbsize, record
> > > the sizes of ringbufs for all connections that have ever appeared in
> > > the net namespace. They are incremental and we cannot know the actual
> > > ringbufs usage from these. So here introduces statistics for current
> > > ringbufs usage of existing smc connections in the net namespace into
> > > smc_stats, it will be incremented when new connection uses a ringbuf
> > > and decremented when the ringbuf is unused.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.h b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > @@ -135,38 +137,45 @@ do { \
> > > } \
> > > while (0)
> > > -#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _len) \
> > > +#define SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _is_add, _len) \
> > > do { \
> > > + typeof(_is_add) is_a = (_is_add); \
> > > typeof(_len) _l = (_len); \
> > > typeof(_tech) t = (_tech); \
> > > int _pos; \
> > > int m = SMC_BUF_MAX - 1; \
> > > if (_l <= 0) \
> > > break; \
> > > - _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
> > > - _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
> > > - this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
> > > + if (is_a) { \
> > > + _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
> > > + _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
> > > + this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
> > > + this_cpu_add((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbuse, _l); \
> >
> > Nit:
> >
> > I see that due to the construction of the caller, SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE(),
> > it will not occur. But checkpatch warns of possible side effects
> > from reuse of _smc_stats.
> >
> > As great care seems to have been taken in these macros to avoid such
> > problems, even if theoretical, perhaps it is worth doing so here too.
> >
> > f.e. A macro-local variable could store (*(_smc_stats)).smc[t] which
> > I think would both resolve the problem mentioned, and make some
> > lines shorter (and maybe easier to read).
> >
>
> It makes sense. I will use a macro-local variable of smc_stats. Thank you!
Great, thanks.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.