net/wireless/util.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26),
AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4
and AC_VI (Video).
However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant
Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3
and AC_BE (Best Effort).
Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com>
---
net/wireless/util.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
index 082c6f9..4e04618 100644
--- a/net/wireless/util.c
+++ b/net/wireless/util.c
@@ -998,7 +998,6 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff *skb,
* Diffserv Service Classes no update is needed:
* - Standard: DF
* - Low Priority Data: CS1
- * - Multimedia Streaming: AF31, AF32, AF33
* - Multimedia Conferencing: AF41, AF42, AF43
* - Network Control Traffic: CS7
* - Real-Time Interactive: CS4
@@ -1026,6 +1025,12 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff *skb,
/* Broadcasting video: CS3 */
ret = 4;
break;
+ case 26:
+ case 28:
+ case 30:
+ /* Multimedia Streaming: AF31, AF32, AF33 */
+ ret = 4;
+ break;
case 40:
/* Signaling: CS5 */
ret = 5;
--
2.42.0.windows.2
+ Guillaume and Ido On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:17:42PM +0800, hhorace wrote: > According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26), > AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4 > and AC_VI (Video). > > However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant > Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3 > and AC_BE (Best Effort). > > Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com> Adding Guillaume and Ido as this relates to DSCP. > --- > net/wireless/util.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c > index 082c6f9..4e04618 100644 > --- a/net/wireless/util.c > +++ b/net/wireless/util.c > @@ -998,7 +998,6 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff *skb, > * Diffserv Service Classes no update is needed: > * - Standard: DF > * - Low Priority Data: CS1 > - * - Multimedia Streaming: AF31, AF32, AF33 > * - Multimedia Conferencing: AF41, AF42, AF43 > * - Network Control Traffic: CS7 > * - Real-Time Interactive: CS4 > @@ -1026,6 +1025,12 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff *skb, > /* Broadcasting video: CS3 */ > ret = 4; > break; > + case 26: > + case 28: > + case 30: > + /* Multimedia Streaming: AF31, AF32, AF33 */ > + ret = 4; > + break; > case 40: > /* Signaling: CS5 */ > ret = 5; > -- > 2.42.0.windows.2 > >
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:08:44AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> + Guillaume and Ido
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:17:42PM +0800, hhorace wrote:
> > According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26),
> > AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4
> > and AC_VI (Video).
> >
> > However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant
> > Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3
> > and AC_BE (Best Effort).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com>
>
> Adding Guillaume and Ido as this relates to DSCP.
Thanks. The patch looks good to me (only missing a Fixes tag).
Just a note to hhorace: the entry for CS5 (case 40) is useless as CS5
is 101000. So the value of the 3 high order bits already is 5 (in case
you want to make a followup patch for net-next).
Fixes: 6fdb8b8781d5 ("wifi: cfg80211: Update the default DSCP-to-UP mapping")
Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > net/wireless/util.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
> > index 082c6f9..4e04618 100644
> > --- a/net/wireless/util.c
> > +++ b/net/wireless/util.c
> > @@ -998,7 +998,6 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > * Diffserv Service Classes no update is needed:
> > * - Standard: DF
> > * - Low Priority Data: CS1
> > - * - Multimedia Streaming: AF31, AF32, AF33
> > * - Multimedia Conferencing: AF41, AF42, AF43
> > * - Network Control Traffic: CS7
> > * - Real-Time Interactive: CS4
> > @@ -1026,6 +1025,12 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > /* Broadcasting video: CS3 */
> > ret = 4;
> > break;
> > + case 26:
> > + case 28:
> > + case 30:
> > + /* Multimedia Streaming: AF31, AF32, AF33 */
> > + ret = 4;
> > + break;
> > case 40:
> > /* Signaling: CS5 */
> > ret = 5;
> > --
> > 2.42.0.windows.2
> >
> >
>
Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:08:44AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: >> + Guillaume and Ido >> >> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:17:42PM +0800, hhorace wrote: >> > According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26), >> > AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4 >> > and AC_VI (Video). >> > >> > However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant >> > Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3 >> > and AC_BE (Best Effort). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com> >> >> Adding Guillaume and Ido as this relates to DSCP. > > Thanks. The patch looks good to me (only missing a Fixes tag). > > Just a note to hhorace: the entry for CS5 (case 40) is useless as CS5 > is 101000. So the value of the 3 high order bits already is 5 (in case > you want to make a followup patch for net-next). Minor clarification: cfg80211 patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 10:24:13AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:08:44AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > >> + Guillaume and Ido > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:17:42PM +0800, hhorace wrote: > >> > According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26), > >> > AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4 > >> > and AC_VI (Video). > >> > > >> > However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant > >> > Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3 > >> > and AC_BE (Best Effort). > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com> > >> > >> Adding Guillaume and Ido as this relates to DSCP. > > > > Thanks. The patch looks good to me (only missing a Fixes tag). > > > > Just a note to hhorace: the entry for CS5 (case 40) is useless as CS5 > > is 101000. So the value of the 3 high order bits already is 5 (in case > > you want to make a followup patch for net-next). > > Minor clarification: cfg80211 patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. Yes, sorry for the confusion :-/. > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches >
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> writes: > > Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:08:44AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > >> + Guillaume and Ido > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:17:42PM +0800, hhorace wrote: > >> > According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26), > >> > AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4 > >> > and AC_VI (Video). > >> > > >> > However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant > >> > Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3 > >> > and AC_BE (Best Effort). > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com> > >> > >> Adding Guillaume and Ido as this relates to DSCP. > > > > Thanks. The patch looks good to me (only missing a Fixes tag). > > > > Just a note to hhorace: the entry for CS5 (case 40) is useless as CS5 > > is 101000. So the value of the 3 high order bits already is 5 (in case > > you want to make a followup patch for net-next). Sure. I will add it in next version. > > Minor clarification: cfg80211 patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. Thanks for your clarification. > > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26),
AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4
and AC_VI (Video).
However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant
Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3
and AC_BE (Best Effort).
Fixes: 6fdb8b8781d5 ("wifi: cfg80211: Update the default DSCP-to-UP mapping")
Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Remove the useless entry for CS5 (case 40) since the value of the 3
high order bits is already 5.
net/wireless/util.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
index 082c6f9..c6d0397 100644
--- a/net/wireless/util.c
+++ b/net/wireless/util.c
@@ -998,10 +998,10 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff *skb,
* Diffserv Service Classes no update is needed:
* - Standard: DF
* - Low Priority Data: CS1
- * - Multimedia Streaming: AF31, AF32, AF33
* - Multimedia Conferencing: AF41, AF42, AF43
* - Network Control Traffic: CS7
* - Real-Time Interactive: CS4
+ * - Signaling: CS5
*/
switch (dscp >> 2) {
case 10:
@@ -1026,9 +1026,11 @@ unsigned int cfg80211_classify8021d(struct sk_buff *skb,
/* Broadcasting video: CS3 */
ret = 4;
break;
- case 40:
- /* Signaling: CS5 */
- ret = 5;
+ case 26:
+ case 28:
+ case 30:
+ /* Multimedia Streaming: AF31, AF32, AF33 */
+ ret = 4;
break;
case 44:
/* Voice Admit: VA */
--
2.42.0.windows.2
On Wed, 2024-08-07 at 16:22 +0800, hhorace wrote:
> According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26),
> AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4
> and AC_VI (Video).
>
> However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant
> Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3
> and AC_BE (Best Effort).
>
> Fixes: 6fdb8b8781d5 ("wifi: cfg80211: Update the default DSCP-to-UP mapping")
> Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com>
^^^ looks more like a username, is that really your name/"known
identity"?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin
johannes
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:22:05PM +0800, hhorace wrote:
> According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26),
> AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4
> and AC_VI (Video).
>
> However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant
> Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3
> and AC_BE (Best Effort).
>
> Fixes: 6fdb8b8781d5 ("wifi: cfg80211: Update the default DSCP-to-UP mapping")
> Signed-off-by: hhorace <hhoracehsu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:22:05PM +0800, hhorace wrote: > According to RFC8325 4.3, Multimedia Streaming: AF31(011010, 26), > AF32(011100, 28), AF33(011110, 30) maps to User Priority = 4 > and AC_VI (Video). > > However, the original code remain the default three Most Significant > Bits (MSBs) of the DSCP, which makes AF3x map to User Priority = 3 > and AC_BE (Best Effort). > Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.