Fix sparse warning:
drivers/regulator/max77857-regulator.c:430:28: warning: symbol 'max77857_id' was not declared. Should it be static?

max77857_id is not used outside the source file. Make it static.

Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/max77857-regulator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max77857-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/max77857-regulator.c
index bc28dc8503a8..1216cc3a6f72 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/max77857-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/max77857-regulator.c
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static int max77857_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-const struct i2c_device_id max77857_id[] = {
+static const struct i2c_device_id max77857_id[] = {
 	{ "max77831", ID_MAX77831 },
 	{ "max77857", ID_MAX77857 },
 	{ "max77859", ID_MAX77859 },
-- 
2.34.1

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:45:36 +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
> Fix sparse warning:
> drivers/regulator/max77857-regulator.c:430:28: warning: symbol 'max77857_id' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> max77857_id is not used outside the source file. Make it static.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: max77857: Make max77857_id static
      commit: cd7d47c5762997a2b1de57a47cd48a1cdad38d96

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark