Drop the manual access to the fwnode of the device to iterate over its
child nodes. `device_for_each_child_node` macro provides direct access
to the child nodes, and given that they are only required within the
loop, the scoped variant of the macro can be used.
Use the `device_for_each_child_node_scoped` macro to iterate over the
direct child nodes of the device.
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
index ccef04f27f12..d0ae10bf6128 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
@@ -416,20 +416,16 @@ static int cti_plat_create_impdef_connections(struct device *dev,
struct cti_drvdata *drvdata)
{
int rc = 0;
- struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
- struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev_fwnode(dev)))
return -EINVAL;
- fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child) {
+ device_for_each_child_node_scoped(dev, child) {
if (cti_plat_node_name_eq(child, CTI_DT_CONNS))
- rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata,
- child);
+ rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata, child);
if (rc != 0)
break;
}
- fwnode_handle_put(child);
return rc;
}
--
2.43.0
On 01/08/2024 07:13, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> Drop the manual access to the fwnode of the device to iterate over its
> child nodes. `device_for_each_child_node` macro provides direct access
> to the child nodes, and given that they are only required within the
> loop, the scoped variant of the macro can be used.
>
> Use the `device_for_each_child_node_scoped` macro to iterate over the
> direct child nodes of the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
> index ccef04f27f12..d0ae10bf6128 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
> @@ -416,20 +416,16 @@ static int cti_plat_create_impdef_connections(struct device *dev,
> struct cti_drvdata *drvdata)
> {
> int rc = 0;
> - struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
> - struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
>
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev_fwnode(dev)))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child) {
> + device_for_each_child_node_scoped(dev, child) {
> if (cti_plat_node_name_eq(child, CTI_DT_CONNS))
> - rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata,
> - child);
> + rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata, child);
> if (rc != 0)
> break;
Don't we need to fwnode_handle_put(child) here, since we removed the
outer one ?
Suzuki
On 01/08/2024 11:20, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 01/08/2024 07:13, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> Drop the manual access to the fwnode of the device to iterate over its
>> child nodes. `device_for_each_child_node` macro provides direct access
>> to the child nodes, and given that they are only required within the
>> loop, the scoped variant of the macro can be used.
>>
>> Use the `device_for_each_child_node_scoped` macro to iterate over the
>> direct child nodes of the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c | 10 +++-------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c b/
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
>> index ccef04f27f12..d0ae10bf6128 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
>> @@ -416,20 +416,16 @@ static int
>> cti_plat_create_impdef_connections(struct device *dev,
>> struct cti_drvdata *drvdata)
>> {
>> int rc = 0;
>> - struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
>> - struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
>> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev_fwnode(dev)))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> - fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child) {
>> + device_for_each_child_node_scoped(dev, child) {
>> if (cti_plat_node_name_eq(child, CTI_DT_CONNS))
>> - rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata,
>> - child);
>> + rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata, child);
>> if (rc != 0)
>> break;
>
> Don't we need to fwnode_handle_put(child) here, since we removed the
> outer one ?
>
> Suzuki
>
Hi Suzuki,
No, we don't need fwnode_handle_put(child) anymore because the scoped
variant of the macro is used.
Best regards,
Javier Carrasco
On 01/08/2024 11:37, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 01/08/2024 11:20, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 01/08/2024 07:13, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>>> Drop the manual access to the fwnode of the device to iterate over its
>>> child nodes. `device_for_each_child_node` macro provides direct access
>>> to the child nodes, and given that they are only required within the
>>> loop, the scoped variant of the macro can be used.
>>>
>>> Use the `device_for_each_child_node_scoped` macro to iterate over the
>>> direct child nodes of the device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c | 10 +++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c b/
>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
>>> index ccef04f27f12..d0ae10bf6128 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
>>> @@ -416,20 +416,16 @@ static int
>>> cti_plat_create_impdef_connections(struct device *dev,
>>> struct cti_drvdata *drvdata)
>>> {
>>> int rc = 0;
>>> - struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
>>> - struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
>>> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev_fwnode(dev)))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> - fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child) {
>>> + device_for_each_child_node_scoped(dev, child) {
>>> if (cti_plat_node_name_eq(child, CTI_DT_CONNS))
>>> - rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata,
>>> - child);
>>> + rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata, child);
>>> if (rc != 0)
>>> break;
>>
>> Don't we need to fwnode_handle_put(child) here, since we removed the
>> outer one ?
>>
>> Suzuki
>>
>
> Hi Suzuki,
>
> No, we don't need fwnode_handle_put(child) anymore because the scoped
> variant of the macro is used.
Ah, apologies, was looking at the non-scoped version. I will queue this.
Suzuki
>
> Best regards,
> Javier Carrasco
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.