Use of_property_present() to test for property presence rather than
of_find_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove callers
of of_find_property() and similar functions. of_find_property() leaks
the DT struct property and data pointers which is a problem for
dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
index 623df65a5d6f..855d6d99a253 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
@@ -823,16 +823,16 @@ static struct samsung_pmx_func *samsung_pinctrl_create_functions(
 		struct device_node *func_np;
 
 		if (!of_get_child_count(cfg_np)) {
-			if (!of_find_property(cfg_np,
-			    "samsung,pin-function", NULL))
+			if (!of_property_present(cfg_np,
+			    "samsung,pin-function"))
 				continue;
 			++func_cnt;
 			continue;
 		}
 
 		for_each_child_of_node(cfg_np, func_np) {
-			if (!of_find_property(func_np,
-			    "samsung,pin-function", NULL))
+			if (!of_property_present(func_np,
+			    "samsung,pin-function"))
 				continue;
 			++func_cnt;
 		}
-- 
2.43.0

On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:12:54 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Use of_property_present() to test for property presence rather than
> of_find_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove callers
> of of_find_property() and similar functions. of_find_property() leaks
> the DT struct property and data pointers which is a problem for
> dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] pinctrl: samsung: Use of_property_present()
      https://git.kernel.org/pinctrl/samsung/c/aa85d45338692e8b29b0c023826c404c3e7113a6

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>