arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE.
To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize
all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE.
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#include <asm/numa.h>
-static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
+static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
{
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
index 0231482d6946..ff95aeebee3e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#include <asm/numa.h>
-static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
+static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
{
--
2.34.1
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:59:55 +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE.
> To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize
> all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
>
Applied arm64 hunk to arm64 (for-next/acpi), thanks!
[1/1] ACPI: NUMA: initialize all values of acpi_early_node_map to NUMA_NO_NODE
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/8bb0376fe082
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 11:59:55AM GMT, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE.
> To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize
> all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Thanks, but I think Reported-by, or both Reported-by and Suggested-by,
is more appropriate. Also, I agree with Sunil that we probably need to
split this patch for arm64 and riscv in order to add appropriate Fixes
tags.
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
>
> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
>
> int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 0231482d6946..ff95aeebee3e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
>
> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
>
> int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
With the tags additions,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Thanks,
drew
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE.
> To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize
> all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
>
> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
>
> int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 0231482d6946..ff95aeebee3e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
>
> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
>
The change looks good to me. However, I was wondering whether it needs
"Fixes" tag in which case I think you will have to split this patch into
two.
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Thanks!
Sunil
> int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
On 7/29/24 09:29, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Currently, only acpi_early_node_map[0] was initialized to NUMA_NO_NODE.
> To ensure all the values were properly initialized, switch to initialize
> all of them to NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (arm64 platform)
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 0c036a9a3c33..2465f291c7e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
>
> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
>
> int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 0231482d6946..ff95aeebee3e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
>
> -static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { NUMA_NO_NODE };
> +static int acpi_early_node_map[NR_CPUS] __initdata = { [0 ... NR_CPUS - 1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
>
> int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu)
> {
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.