[PATCH 05/12] selftests/nolibc: report failure if no testcase passed

Thomas Weißschuh posted 12 patches 1 year, 4 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 05/12] selftests/nolibc: report failure if no testcase passed
Posted by Thomas Weißschuh 1 year, 4 months ago
When nolibc-test is so broken, it doesn't even start,
don't report success.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
index 3fbabab46958..46dfbb50fae5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ LDFLAGS :=
 
 REPORT  ?= awk '/\[OK\][\r]*$$/{p++} /\[FAIL\][\r]*$$/{if (!f) printf("\n"); f++; print;} /\[SKIPPED\][\r]*$$/{s++} \
 		END{ printf("\n%3d test(s): %3d passed, %3d skipped, %3d failed => status: ", p+s+f, p, s, f); \
-		if (f) printf("failure\n"); else if (s) printf("warning\n"); else printf("success\n");; \
+		if (f || !p) printf("failure\n"); else if (s) printf("warning\n"); else printf("success\n");; \
 		printf("\nSee all results in %s\n", ARGV[1]); }'
 
 help:

-- 
2.45.2