tools/perf/tests/pmu.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
Commit aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
test APIs") added the 'test_pmus' list, but didn't use it.
(It seems to put them on the other_pmus list?)
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
---
tools/perf/tests/pmu.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
index 40132655ccd1..0b2f04a55d7b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
@@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
-/* Fake PMUs created in temp directory. */
-static LIST_HEAD(test_pmus);
-
/* Cleanup test PMU directory. */
static int test_pmu_put(const char *dir, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
{
--
2.45.2
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 10:59 AM <linux@treblig.org> wrote:
>
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
>
> Commit aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
> test APIs") added the 'test_pmus' list, but didn't use it.
> (It seems to put them on the other_pmus list?)
>
> Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Strange that the compiler doesn't warn about unused stuff like this,
we get unused variables within a function and unused static
functions...
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Possibly:
Fixes: aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
test APIs")
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/pmu.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> index 40132655ccd1..0b2f04a55d7b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
>
> -/* Fake PMUs created in temp directory. */
> -static LIST_HEAD(test_pmus);
> -
> /* Cleanup test PMU directory. */
> static int test_pmu_put(const char *dir, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> {
> --
> 2.45.2
>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 07:52:53AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 10:59 AM <linux@treblig.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
> >
> > Commit aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
> > test APIs") added the 'test_pmus' list, but didn't use it.
> > (It seems to put them on the other_pmus list?)
> >
> > Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
>
> Strange that the compiler doesn't warn about unused stuff like this,
> we get unused variables within a function and unused static
> functions...
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Thanks, applied to tmp.perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
> Possibly:
> Fixes: aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
> test APIs")
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/tests/pmu.c | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > index 40132655ccd1..0b2f04a55d7b 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
> > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> >
> > -/* Fake PMUs created in temp directory. */
> > -static LIST_HEAD(test_pmus);
> > -
> > /* Cleanup test PMU directory. */
> > static int test_pmu_put(const char *dir, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
* Ian Rogers (irogers@google.com) wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 10:59 AM <linux@treblig.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
> >
> > Commit aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
> > test APIs") added the 'test_pmus' list, but didn't use it.
> > (It seems to put them on the other_pmus list?)
> >
> > Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
>
> Strange that the compiler doesn't warn about unused stuff like this,
> we get unused variables within a function and unused static
> functions...
The problem is that LIST_HEAD initialises the list to point to itself;
so it *is* used - but only in it's own initialiser.
I did file:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115027
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Thanks,
> Possibly:
> Fixes: aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
> test APIs")
Given it's got no actual effect other than a few bytes
saved, I'm not sure it's worth the Fixes.
Dave
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/tests/pmu.c | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > index 40132655ccd1..0b2f04a55d7b 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
> > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> >
> > -/* Fake PMUs created in temp directory. */
> > -static LIST_HEAD(test_pmus);
> > -
> > /* Cleanup test PMU directory. */
> > static int test_pmu_put(const char *dir, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 8:07 AM Dr. David Alan Gilbert
<linux@treblig.org> wrote:
>
> * Ian Rogers (irogers@google.com) wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 10:59 AM <linux@treblig.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
> > >
> > > Commit aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
> > > test APIs") added the 'test_pmus' list, but didn't use it.
> > > (It seems to put them on the other_pmus list?)
> > >
> > > Remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
> >
> > Strange that the compiler doesn't warn about unused stuff like this,
> > we get unused variables within a function and unused static
> > functions...
>
> The problem is that LIST_HEAD initialises the list to point to itself;
> so it *is* used - but only in it's own initialiser.
> I did file:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115027
Nice, the bug already has a fix - good work! Hopefully clang can follow suit.
> > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Possibly:
> > Fixes: aa1551f299ba ("perf test pmu: Refactor format test and exposed
> > test APIs")
>
> Given it's got no actual effect other than a few bytes
> saved, I'm not sure it's worth the Fixes.
Ack. I mention it so the maintainers can make a decision about fixing
in 6.11 (still in rc stage) or whether to hold for 6.12. It seems
pretty safe either way, but for 6.11 probably better to have a fixes
tag. If the GCC warning becomes a thing there's a chance the code
won't build without the fix :-)
Thanks,
Ian
> Dave
>
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/tests/pmu.c | 3 ---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > > index 40132655ccd1..0b2f04a55d7b 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu.c
> > > @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
> > > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > > #include <sys/types.h>
> > >
> > > -/* Fake PMUs created in temp directory. */
> > > -static LIST_HEAD(test_pmus);
> > > -
> > > /* Cleanup test PMU directory. */
> > > static int test_pmu_put(const char *dir, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> > > {
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2
> > >
> --
> -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
> / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
> \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
> \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.